Back to @SebGorka's profile

Sebastian Gorka DrG engagement report

@SebGorka - 1.9M followers on X

Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.062%
of 1.9M followers
Per impression
2.44%
47K views on a typical post
Reach
2.54%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.053%
25 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
12.63/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.062%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 2.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 12.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5M interactions, about 2420x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gonavy, #norad, #ussgw.

Measured over 61 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026. Recurring tags: #gonavy, #norad, #ussgw.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sebastian Gorka DrG's engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.062%, Sebastian Gorka DrG sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99159.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,852 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,564 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 20232420x their median

    https://t.co/MlIKklPSJT https://t.co/Mcbf2xozsY

    1.8M360K309K104K337M viewsView on X
  • Apr 11, 2026296x their median

    Masoumeh Ebtekar - also known as "Screaming Mary" - was the spokeswoman for the Islamic terrorists who stormed the U.S. Embassy in Tehran in 1979 and held 52 Americans hostage for 444 days - subjecting them to beatings, starvation, and mock executions. In 2014, the Obama Administration granted visas to her son and his family to enter the United States. In June 2016, the Obama Administration gave them lawful permanent resident status via the Diversity Immigrant Visa Program. This week, I terminated their lawful permanent resident status and today, Seyed Eissa Hashemi, Maryam Tahmasebi, and their son are now in the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement pending their removal from our country. Her family should never have been allowed to benefit from the extraordinary privilege of living in our country. America can never become home for anti-American terrorists or their families - and under the Trump Administration, it never will.

    236K64K22K5.8K7.4M viewsView on X
  • Dec 5, 2025102x their median

    You’ve probably heard the news by now: Minnesota fraudsters stole over $1 billion from Medicaid. And you deserve an explanation. Our staff at CMS told me they’ve never seen anything like this in Medicaid — and everyone from Gov. Tim Walz on down needs to be investigated, because they’ve been asleep at the wheel. Based on what we know now, this is a clear dereliction of duty. First, the facts: In recent years, Minnesota Medicaid launched several new programs, including Housing Stabilization Services, which helped disabled homeless individuals, and Early Intensive Developmental and Behavioral Intervention, which reimbursed therapy costs for families with autistic children. Some bad actors in Minnesota’s Somali community decided to game the system. And when they got away with it, they decided to go bigger. The housing program was supposed to cost $2.6 million dollars annually. Last year, it paid out over $100 million. The autism program ballooned from $3 million in 2018 to nearly $400 million in 2023. These scammers used stolen taxpayer money to buy flashy cars, purchase overseas real estate, and offer kickbacks to parents who enrolled their kids at fake autism treatment centers. Some of it may have even made its way to the Somalian terrorist group Al-Shebab. So why didn’t Walz stop them? That’s simple: because he went all-in on identity politics. Somalis are a huge voting bloc, and the state’s leaders were afraid that “forcefully tackling this issue might cause political backlash.” That’s not me saying that. It’s a Somali-American fraud investigator who talked to The New York Times. Somali scammers get rich off the programs Gov. Walz was supposed to be managing. Minnesota politicians get elected with Somali votes and keep the money flowing. This isn’t just fraud: it’s political patronage at public expense. When Minnesota told CMS about the problem last year, they assured us they’d handle it. By summer, it was obvious they couldn’t — or wouldn’t. So, we stepped in and shut down the worst program: housing. We also froze provider enrollment in a few of the most abused programs. So where do we go from here? To restore the integrity of the Medicaid program, Minnesota must: 1. Provide CMS with weekly updates on how the state is stopping fraud. 2. Freeze enrollment of all high-risk providers for 6 months. 3. Confirm all providers in place are legitimate or remove them. 4. Send CMS a corrective action plan of how these will prevent this from happening again. If we’re unsatisfied with the state’s plans or cooperation, we’ll stop paying the federal share of these programs. The message to Walz is clear: either fix this in 60 days or start looking under your couch for spare change, because we’re done footing the bill for your incompetence. With CMS on the case, these scammers and their bureaucratic enablers have nowhere left to hide. The vulnerable Americans who depend on these programs — and the taxpayers who fund them — deserve the truth.

    83K23K5.5K1.6K16M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202629x their median

    This clip perfectly embodies the uselessness of so many of our politicians. Senator Blumenthal (from my home state of Connecticut), holds a press conference on train safety. Blumenthal breaks the rules, walks too close to the edge, and almost gets hit by a train. 🤣 https://t.co/w34I9fcFYs

    26K4.6K2.4K6652.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202627x their median

    A new era for the White House 🚁 President Trump shows off the beautiful new White House helipad to the press, etching his name into history and giving massive credit to the construction crew who helped make the helipad a reality. https://t.co/vv36DMxW0b

    24K4.1K2.4K235602K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202626x their median

    An anonymous source insists that what they heard from two other anonymous sources is 100% factually true—because one anonymous sources in the West Wing was told the exact same thing by two more anonymous sources at Cafe Milano, who also heard it. So yes, we are writing this bullshit story full of lies, and we’re sticking to it. We’re going with the piece that rests on a grand total of six anonymous sources, while ignoring the eight Cabinet members who gave us statements on the record. I can’t imagine why the American people keep calling us Fake News🤷🏻‍♂️!

    23K5.1K734237622K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202617x their median

    “I WON THE ELECTION!” Indeed. https://t.co/6vbQ3lUfYP

    16K3.2K86368164K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202616x their median

    NEW FAUCI EMAIL: SYSTEM BLINKING RED @SenRonJohnson @SenRandPaul Just months after the COVID-19 vaccine emergency authorization, the Acting FDA Commissioner flagged "adverse events...(from all three of the current vaccines.) The main complaint is that “no one takes them seriously, no one knows how to treat them, and there is no effort to study this” "I think it would be worthwhile to do a study and evaluate a cohort of these individuals." “I doubt the industry would support, for obvious reasons. But my experience is, that if you let a problem fester, then it will come back to bite you later and you are not prepared.”

    13K4.8K281188375K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202613x their median

    The sci-future I dreamed about as a kid is right here at our doorstep Did you know you can request the raw photos from the Artemis II mission? There is a lot of information hidden in the RAWs that isn't visible in the jpgs. Check the next post in this thread for the raw https://t.co/zuthGiuKfS

    13K1.1K1631171.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202610x their median

    A Democrat crossdresser gets humiliated after Marco Rubio stops him cold in his tracks with just one line https://t.co/VVipDKvJ4q

    9.6K8321.3K51415K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#gonavy#norad#ussgw#cvn73#fbiwfo

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 1.9M followers, an engagement rate of 0.062%. Measured over 61 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 3,809 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 47K times each, and 2.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 12.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 61 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 26% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5M interactions, about 2420x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gonavy, #norad, #ussgw.

What is Sebastian Gorka DrG's engagement rate on X?
Sebastian Gorka DrG (@SebGorka) has an engagement rate of 0.062%, based on the median interactions across 61 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,850,379 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.062%, Sebastian Gorka DrG sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,852 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SebGorka have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,809 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SebGorka post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 12.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going