ScreaM #1TAP engagement report
@ScreaM_ - 567K followers on X
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 17K interactions against 567K followers, an engagement rate of 3.08%. Posts are seen about 567K times each, and 3.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 99.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 3.08%, ScreaM #1TAP sits above the 90th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.55% to 82.4%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 460 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 28, 2026
J’ai pas les mots… et peut-être que c’est justement ça qui me fait le plus mal. Maintenant que c’est trop tard, je me dis que j’aurais dû faire plus. Malek était l’une des rares personnes vraiment vraies et bienveillantes que j’ai connues, mais tellement incomprise par beaucoup. J’ai prié avec lui, Dieu en est témoin. Repose en paix mon frère. Les mots me manquent… Toutes mes condoléances à sa famille et à ses enfants. Qu’Allah vous donne la force. 🤲🏼🕊️
- Jun 4, 2026
Bro got an AK-47 spray pattern tattoo💀 https://t.co/6L3fRZR7V7
- Apr 21, 2026
ZywOo is back to AWPing (40% this year) Enemies moving like CS:GO it's over.https://t.co/4pBPBUaGdZ
- Apr 21, 2026
omg it feels like csgo actually, people don't move as much when they shoot. 1 taps might be back
- Jun 15, 2026
Congrats 9z for making it to playoffs, well deserved looking forward to see more! #IEM
- Jun 19, 2026
Best Major I have watched, level is so close between all teams; adding Cologne crowd on top of that. 💯
- May 15, 2026
That was absolute cinema
- Jul 2, 2026
they talk about my 32 taps 🙄
- Apr 13, 2026
Been a while since I tweeted about playing official on CS. Our journey starts tonight, lots to improve still on my side but confident and happy to be here🫡
- May 27, 2026
Eid Mubarak, peace and love 💚🌙
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 17K interactions against 567K followers, an engagement rate of 3.08%. Posts are seen about 567K times each, and 3.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 99.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is ScreaM #1TAP's engagement rate on X?
- ScreaM #1TAP (@ScreaM_) has an engagement rate of 3.08%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 567,478 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 3.08%, ScreaM #1TAP sits above the 90th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ScreaM_ have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @ScreaM_ post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.