Back to @ScreaM_'s profile

ScreaM #1TAP engagement report

@ScreaM_ - 571K followers on X

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.017%
of 571K followers
Per impression
0.462%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
3.64%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
96
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.27/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Sunday

Early reading. We have captured 5 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 571K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.462% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 71x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #1tap, #collaborationcommerciale, #legionatewc. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 5 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #1tap, #collaborationcommerciale, #legionatewc.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, ScreaM #1TAP sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,759 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,964 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-3%95K
14:00 UTC-4%98K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-4%99K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%232K
Monday0%290K
Tuesday-2%281K
Wednesday-1%252K
Thursday-2%245K
Friday-3%254K
Saturday+3%228K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 4, 202671x their median

    Bro got an AK-47 spray pattern tattooπŸ’€ https://t.co/6L3fRZR7V7

    6.6K14440515.0M viewsView on X
  • Apr 21, 202659x their median

    ZywOo is back to AWPing (40% this year) Enemies moving like CS:GO it's over.https://t.co/4pBPBUaGdZ

    5.6K604810803K viewsView on X
  • Apr 21, 202654x their median

    omg it feels like csgo actually, people don't move as much when they shoot. 1 taps might be back

    5.1K57299381K viewsView on X
  • Jun 15, 202621x their median

    Congrats 9z for making it to playoffs, well deserved looking forward to see more! #IEM

    1.9K7316232K viewsView on X
  • Jun 19, 202620x their median

    Best Major I have watched, level is so close between all teams; adding Cologne crowd on top of that. πŸ’―

    1.9K264045K viewsView on X
  • May 15, 202611x their median

    That was absolute cinema

    1.0K94055K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 202610x their median

    they talk about my 32 taps πŸ™„

    9602618087K viewsView on X
  • Apr 13, 202610x their median

    Been a while since I tweeted about playing official on CS. Our journey starts tonight, lots to improve still on my side but confident and happy to be here🫑

    949926053K viewsView on X
  • May 27, 20269.9x their median

    Eid Mubarak, peace and love πŸ’šπŸŒ™

    908327032K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20269.4x their median

    Qualified to ENC with πŸ‡²πŸ‡¦ Hamdullilah

    8602316072K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#1tap#collaborationcommerciale#legionatewc#s9faceit

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 96 interactions against 571K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.462% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.27 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 5 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 71x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #1tap, #collaborationcommerciale, #legionatewc. Only 5 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is ScreaM #1TAP's engagement rate on X?
ScreaM #1TAP (@ScreaM_) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 5 original posts from the last 30 days against 570,787 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, ScreaM #1TAP sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,759 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ScreaM_ have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @ScreaM_ post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going