Back to @ScottWilliams's profile

Scott Williams engagement report

@ScottWilliams - 88K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 88K followers
Per impression
0.345%
869 views on a typical post
Reach
0.99%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 88K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 869 times each, and 0.345% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.988% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16 interactions, about 5.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Scott Williams's engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, Scott Williams sits below the 10th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.54%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 202,076 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,928 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 143 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 2, 20265.3x their median

    It’s never a question of whether God is working. The question is whether we’re willing to align ourselves with what He’s doing.

    133002.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.3x their median

    I stopped worrying about what people think when I realized how few people actually think, and many of those who do aren’t very good at it.

    8101921 viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 20263.0x their median

    You don’t deserve success… but if you develop the right mindset, the right skill set, and a relentless work ethic, you earn the right to expect it.

    7200994 viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20263.0x their median

    Multitasking is not a skill to master. It’s a habit to unlearn. The elite don’t accomplish more because they do more. They accomplish more because they do what matters most, with complete focus, at the right time.

    6120722 viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.3x their median

    Some of the most consequential decisions in your life are the ones you keep refusing to make… Make them now. ~Dr. Scott

    5200986 viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.3x their median

    Question for Christ followers: If someone follows you long enough, will they end up closer to Jesus? ~Dr. Scott

    4030861 viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.3x their median

    Nobody’s coming to rescue you, validate you, choose you, or do it for you. Once you accept that, you’re left with the only question that matters: Now what are you going to do about it?

    70001.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20262.0x their median

    Sometimes the biggest red flag isnt the lie, its how badly you want the lie to be true.

    6000973 viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.0x their median

    People often ask, “What’s the best parenting advice you can give?” Mine is simple: “Make sure your children get the best of you, not what’s left of you. Don’t consistently give your job, friends, or social media a better version of you than you give your children.” Your children deserve your most intentional time, talk, and tone. Give the world your excellence, but give your children your best.

    5100830 viewsView on X
  • Jun 28, 20262.0x their median

    The greatest danger isn’t looking ahead… it’s losing perspective. Yesterday’s prayer is today’s reality. Today’s reality is someone else’s prayer. Be grateful for how far God has brought you, and trust Him for where He’s taking you next.

    5100358 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 88K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 9% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 869 times each, and 0.345% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.988% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16 interactions, about 5.3x its own typical post.

What is Scott Williams's engagement rate on X?
Scott Williams (@ScottWilliams) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 87,991 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, Scott Williams sits below the 10th percentile of the 202,076 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ScottWilliams have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 9% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ScottWilliams post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going