Back to @ScottPresler's profile

ThePersistence engagement report

@ScottPresler - 2.5M followers on X

Measured over 129 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.707%
of 2.5M followers
Per impression
13.0%
136K views on a typical post
Reach
5.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
18K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
68 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.47/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 18K interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.707%. Measured over 129 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 136K times each, and 13.0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 129 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 230K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

Measured over 129 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ThePersistence's engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 100% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.707%, ThePersistence sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99155.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,856 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 97,248 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile155.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-3%101K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%102K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%238K
Monday0%302K
Tuesday-3%302K
Wednesday-1%257K
Thursday-2%250K
Friday-3%259K
Saturday+3%233K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 3, 202613x their median

    I’M IN TEARS I’M SCREAMING The Pennsylvania Department of State just conducted one of its biggest purges ever. Democrats lost TENS of thousands of voters. It’s happening — it’s actually happening. Our work to clean the voter rolls is actually working. Sunlight is the best disinfectant. This is a massive, earth-shattering earthquake of epic proportions. Wait until you see how close we are to flipping Pennsylvania 🟦🔜🟥! My heart sings a tune loudly for all to hear.

    187K33K7.7K1.4K11M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20265.9x their median

    It’s happening. The Census Bureau is cross-referencing the voter records against their citizenship records. They’re finding non-citizens voted illegally. Please do Pennsylvania. https://t.co/yvLoT2LA2Q

    83K19K1.4K308446K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20265.3x their median

    OH MY GOSH! Paula Copenhaver won! After a recount in an Indiana State Senate race, Trump-endorsed Republican Paula Copenhaver DEFEATED a lawmaker that REFUSED to redraw congressional maps. 7/8 Indiana State Senators lost! Paula won by 3 votes. EVERY VOTE COUNTS! @PaulaCopenhaver

    77K16K1.1K367474K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20265.3x their median

    Just inspected the non-juror list for Allegheny County, PA. @erinkoper & I discovered 4,356 non-citizens, 1,300 persons with a language barrier, & 20,658 non-residents. Now, we are painstakingly going through the list to write them down. Only Americans should be voting in our elections.

    70K20K2.3K533604K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.1x their median

    🚨MURKOWSKI PROVED WRONG🚨 @JamesOKeefeIII has done it again! He went to the remote Aleutian Islands in Alaska, where Senator Murkowski said these voters would have to travel to Anchorage just to register to vote. James visited the Unalaska Public Library & the clerk stated that voters CAN register to vote there as well as prove citizenship. This video proves that there is no reason for Senator Murkowski to be against the SAVE America Act. It makes you wonder why Murkowski is against this country-saving legislation when her voters want it.

    67K22K1.4K807612K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20264.8x their median

    If we were to put Flock cameras outside of every polling location & drop box in Milwaukee, Philadelphia, & Pittsburgh, democrats would unite against them.

    72K12K1.8K440718K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20264.7x their median

    🚨HOLY COW🚨 THE MOST IMPORTANT VIDEO OF 2026 @JamesOKeefeIII did an undercover operation to expose Minnesota’s corrupt vouching system. According to law, 1 registered MN voter can vouch for up to 8 persons — those 8 people do NOT need ID. 👉“You are the ID,” an Election Day Worker told O’Keefe👈 Dressed in a niqab, @camhigby showed that a transgender Muslim woman can easily be vouched for as a faceless voter without ID. There is no record for persons being vouched for. There is no system in place to stop 1 registered MN voter from vouching for 8 persons at multiple precincts. There is nothing to stop the vouching system from being abused. This is a constitutional crisis. Pass the SAVE America Act! ‼️SEND THIS VIDEO TO EVERY LEGISLATOR YOU KNOW IN AMERICA‼️

    61K20K1.3K8642.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20264.4x their median

    I FOUND IT! This is an Election Judge training video for Carver County, Minnesota, from 2024. “Do not ask to see an identification card.” “If a voter presents identification, thank the voter & inform them that an identification card is not required if they are registered.” “Have the voter confirm their name & address; point to the oath & have them review the oath. Instruct the voter to sign their name.” Election fraud in Minnesota is as simple as knowing someone’s name, address, & signing a signature. No ID is required. Our elections are broken. Pass the SAVE America Act! *Note: ID isn’t required if you’re registering to vote via vouching — “You are the ID.”

    53K22K1.4K819725K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.3x their median

    We must deport as many illegal aliens as possible before 2029. The 2030 Census is coming.

    66K9.1K822146429K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20264.0x their median

    HOLY COW I cannot believe this is real. Everything we told you about vouching in Minnesota is correct. “A registered voter in that precinct who can personally vouch for the identity & residence of up to 8 new voters.” “A healthcare facility worker can vouch for an 👉UNLIMITED👈 number of residents of facilities that they work for regardless of where that facility worker lives.” This is from an Election Judge training video for Carver County, Minnesota.

    50K19K1.6K768866K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 18K interactions against 2.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.707%. Measured over 129 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 3,899 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 136K times each, and 13.0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 129 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 7% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 230K interactions, about 13x its own typical post.

What is ThePersistence's engagement rate on X?
ThePersistence (@ScottPresler) has an engagement rate of 0.707%, based on the median interactions across 129 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,500,760 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.707%, ThePersistence sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,856 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ScottPresler have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,899 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ScottPresler post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

ThePersistence (@ScottPresler) Engagement Rate - 0.707% | PlayerSells