Back to @ScottJenningsKY's profile

Scott Jennings engagement report

@ScottJenningsKY - 966K followers on X

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.351%
of 966K followers
Per impression
3.53%
96K views on a typical post
Reach
9.95%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.051%
49 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.13/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 3.4K interactions against 966K followers, an engagement rate of 0.351%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 96K times each, and 3.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 132K interactions, about 39x its own typical post.

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Scott Jennings's engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.351%, Scott Jennings sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,037 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.08% to 0.435%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.435%
p902.10%
p99158.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,037 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.435%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%54K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%73K
11:00 UTC-3%79K
12:00 UTC-2%87K
13:00 UTC-2%96K
14:00 UTC-4%99K
15:00 UTC-2%102K
16:00 UTC-3%99K
17:00 UTC-2%92K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-2%80K
20:00 UTC-1%75K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-2%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%233K
Monday0%292K
Tuesday-3%284K
Wednesday-1%253K
Thursday-2%246K
Friday-3%255K
Saturday+3%229K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 4, 202639x their median

    Grand finale at Mt Rushmore. Pretty epic fireworks display! https://t.co/9zZEUEIJXG

    115K15K1.3K4441.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20269.3x their median

    These “big tent democrats” trying to make nice with socialists who want to destroy western civilization…yikes https://t.co/8P6dHkrAuK

    26K4.4K1.3K191509K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20269.2x their median

    Nothing funnier than watching Piker spend years calling Dems useless, only to beg like a dog the second he needs a shield. 🤡 https://t.co/00zZX4iJGe

    27K4.0K457741.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20268.3x their median

    Walks like a socialist. Talks like a socialist. Hangs out with Bernie Sanders and Ilhan Omar. It’s a socialist folks 🦆 https://t.co/FkhvE6piuV

    24K3.4K78176457K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.2x their median

    Donald Trump has done more to elevate women in politics than any other President. Jon Ossoff is a despicable coward who thinks he can get ahead by smearing a cancer survivor and loyal public servant, Natalie Harp. https://t.co/8vdDhAC92D

    19K3.7K4.6K312462K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20267.6x their median

    Democrats can’t even be happy about Trump bringing down prescription drug prices. Constant negativity, even on an issue all politicians promise but only Trump has delivered! Fair vector for the GOP to pursue in the midterms. https://t.co/swdawktdTa

    21K3.4K1.5K101261K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20267.1x their median

    Abdul El-Sayed’s best pal and campaign partner says the USA should resume lynchings against black people. Listen for yourself and understand what the socialists have in store for the black community https://t.co/N3ntbIHefw

    16K6.0K2.1K5162.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20267.0x their median

    Socialists are using a new tactic: laughing and lying about the crazy things they've backed over the years. https://t.co/AclyJ27FHr

    20K3.6K46455186K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20266.3x their median

    OVERLOOKED story this week: yes, Eric Swalwell had sexual relations with a Chinese spy, and yes Democrats lied about it for years to protect him. Credit to @SpeakerMcCarthy who saw him for exactly what he is: a national security threat. https://t.co/cwk7BJafZN

    17K3.3K64648212K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20266.1x their median

    A "Christian pastor" running for Senate calling Bible stories "immoral propaganda" tells you everything you need to know about today's Democratic party. https://t.co/oUfiX1x8fY

    17K3.2K61096162K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.4K interactions against 966K followers, an engagement rate of 0.351%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 90% of 3,829 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 96K times each, and 3.53% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.95% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 132K interactions, about 39x its own typical post.

What is Scott Jennings's engagement rate on X?
Scott Jennings (@ScottJenningsKY) has an engagement rate of 0.351%, based on the median interactions across 66 original posts from the last 30 days against 966,489 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.351%, Scott Jennings sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,037 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ScottJenningsKY have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 90% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,829 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ScottJenningsKY post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going