Anthony Scaramucci engagement report
@Scaramucci - 1.1M followers on X
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 148 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 0.338% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 39% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 220x its own typical post.
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Anthony Scaramucci's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.014%, Anthony Scaramucci sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.438% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 159.8% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 49K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 53K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 71K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 89K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 97K |
| 14:00 UTC | -3% | 100K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 104K |
| 16:00 UTC | -4% | 101K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 94K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 87K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 82K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 68K |
| 22:00 UTC | -1% | 59K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 236K |
| Monday | 0% | 298K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 295K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 255K |
| Thursday | -1% | 249K |
| Friday | -3% | 257K |
| Saturday | +3% | 231K |
Best tweets
- Aug 27, 2026220x their median
Look. If you don't find it fucking hilarious watching a dying 80-year-old pedophile rapist wearing 4 pounds of bronzer drawing "Lake America" over Lake Ontario like it's some kind of genius geopolitical flex, while barely able to speak, I can't help you.🇨🇦 😂😂😂 https://t.co/P3UN1UALrh
- Aug 22, 2026119x their median
Carney now leads the West
- Aug 29, 202646x their median
🚨 Under Gavin Newsom, California's economy is now growing 4 times faster than Texas's. https://t.co/iNpMMOvX7s
- Aug 22, 202628x their median
Canadian views of America have collapsed. Pew: only 33% now have a favorable opinion of the U.S. (54% in 2024). Just 35% still call us a reliable partner — down from 83% in 2022. They now rate China higher than the United States. 81% of Canadians describe the relationship as negative. That’s not a mood swing. That’s a structural break.
- Aug 29, 202624x their median
My uncle, the man I'm named after, left Port Washington in March of 1943. He was supposed to graduate in June, but they shipped him to the UK to train for Normandy. He stormed the beach on June 6th at 19 years old. He survived. He got wounded in France, received the Purple Heart, but stayed with his battalion amd fought in the Battle of the Bulge. That was a generation that had an unconditional love affair with this country. Ready to make a personal sacrifice at 19 to reject authoritarianism and fight for something bigger than themselves. Are you ready for the fight? I am. If we don't speak up and we don't team up, we're in for a very difficult couple of years. So speak up.
- Aug 23, 202619x their median
The US Congress has completely recused itself from their responsibilities to the country. Not only should this have us all worried. We should hold all of the accountable. https://t.co/gFB6W7WkyO
- Aug 25, 202617x their median
Citizens United changed the US forever. It allowed unlimited money to politicians. Campaign donations are up eight times. 36% of it coming from the top 0.1%. They're buying protection, corporate tax cuts, and no antitrust enforcement. Teddy Roosevelt busted the monopolies because concentrated power in the hands of a few is a threat to everyone else. We don't do that anymore, because the monopolies got better at buying the people who would have stopped them. This is not left or right. We must Reform Citizens United.
- Aug 28, 202611x their median
America has no hereditary memory of fascism. In Britain they take field trips to the Churchill war cabinets. In France they go to Normandy. In Germany they visit Auschwitz. The specter of fascism is in the veins of those people 80 years later. We have nothing like that. Franklin Roosevelt put down the first America First movement in the late 1930s: Lindbergh, Huey Long, Father Coughlin. He manhandled them and he had the skills to do it. His own Secretary of the Treasury Morgenthau said it plainly, Roosevelt has the charisma and the skills of a dictator. The good news is he's on our side. We don't have that institutional memory anymore.
- Aug 24, 20269.9x their median
A society works when the middle and lower middle class have rising incomes and feel aspirational about their lives. Right now they feel desperational and Trump has provided zero policy solutions. He's an avatar for their anger, but the answer they're reaching for is to wreck the entire system. The system that produced the greatest economic miracle in the history of the world. And you know who else wants that? Vladimir Putin. Our adversaries have one goal, make the British and American people believe their elections don't matter, their institutions aren't legitimate, the system is rigged against them. Make them cynical. Make them feel left out. Make them burn it down. Trump feeds that narrative every single day. Because his entire political existence depends on people believing the system is broken beyond repair. And our adversaries are watching it work.
- Aug 26, 20267.1x their median
The guy who fired me at Goldman said that I was an experiment. He said I don't dress the part, act the part, talk the part. He was right. I could give you the polished version of my life. I was a blue collar kid, Harvard, Goldman, Entrepreneur of the Year. But I've read enough billionaire memoirs to know what that sounds like. Self-congratulatory and honestly bullsh*t. That version sucks for your children. If you don't expose your vulnerabilities to your kids, your success becomes an impossible standard instead of an inspiration. And for anyone out there wondering if it's doable from the middle class, it is. There will be stupidity and failure and wild self-consciousness. You'll find your way. I'm proof.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 148 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 44K times each, and 0.338% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.02% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 39% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 33K interactions, about 220x its own typical post.
- What is Anthony Scaramucci's engagement rate on X?
- Anthony Scaramucci (@Scaramucci) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,092,973 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.014%, Anthony Scaramucci sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,459 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Scaramucci have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Scaramucci post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.4 posts per day across the measured window.