ScalpX Intel engagement report
@ScalpXIntel - 181K followers on X
Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 181K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 373 times each, and 1.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.206% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 545x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, ScalpX Intel sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 453 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 28, 2025545x their median
The x402 Solana Hackathon is live 🔥 It’s time to build at the frontier of payments: internet native, designed for AI $50,000 in prizes across 5 tracks 👇 https://t.co/wEaS4AuY4P
- Nov 14, 202512x their median
CTFs are live on Solana. If you can’t crack the 1st challenge… bro, Just go back to frontends. https://t.co/6UuPFTnoaq
- Oct 20, 202559x their median
1/ SIMD-0266: Efficient Token Program, authored by @0x_febo, propose replacing the current SPL token program with a new compute optimized version called p-token. The upgrade will reduce Token program CU usage by up to 98%. Here’s how it works 🧵 https://t.co/5ASETDEYqu
- May 20, 202652x their median
2025: chaotic prompt engineering and hoping the model stops hallucinating. 2026: autonomous refactoring and strict zk verification of logic. the era of simple ai wrappers and "on-the-fly prompts" is officially over. the real tectonic shift is happening in coordination layers, where swarms of autonomous agents communicate with each other through strictly typed data structures and intent manifests. but scale demands absolute trust. barrier‑free repository automation is great — but only when the agents' operational logic is rock‑solidly proven. this is precisely where the combination of zero‑noise architecture and bitcoin l1 as the final verification layer turns chaos into a predictable ecosystem. we no longer write rules and if‑else crutches. we declare the desired state of the system, and the agents scale the vision into reality. 🐼⚡️
- Mar 11, 202651x their median
In 2024 we coded rules. In 2026 we code intent. We now describe desired outcomes to AI agents. Blockchain becomes the immutable trust layer where agents transact without manipulation. It's not a database - it's a verifiable world state. How fast will this replace contracts? 🤯 https://t.co/NVHuqGm8Ms
- Feb 28, 202647x their median
GM to everyone except those who didn’t sleep. ☕️✨ May your coffee be strong and your productivity be high today. Let’s make some magic happen. 🪄 https://t.co/eQhFdc1ENO
- Dec 2, 202545x their median
XRP has reached the forecasted $2.00. A further decline toward the $1.80 level is now probable before a confirmed reversal. This projected move defines a strategic buy zone: consider placing limit orders between $1.80 and $2.00 to position for the next potential bullish phase
- Jan 2, 202644x their median
Happy New Year! 2025 was stagnant. 2026's direction depends on the market cycle shift. Wishing you health and success. See you next year! 🔥 https://t.co/7Bh5dgaFT7
- Mar 25, 202642x their median
The shift from writing if-else to composing an 'Intent Manifest' is a fundamental shift. AI agents handle the execution, while we focus on the vision. 🐼💡 https://t.co/IH4PZi4ClT
- Mar 5, 202640x their median
In 2024, we were amazed by AI writing code. In 2026, we’re just watching autonomous agents deploy entire micro-services and negotiate with other AIs while we drink our morning coffee. The line between "tool" and "colleague" is officially gone. ☕️ https://t.co/Jrj3l3reIF
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 181K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Posts are seen about 373 times each, and 1.61% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.206% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 545x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is ScalpX Intel's engagement rate on X?
- ScalpX Intel (@ScalpXIntel) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 180,758 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, ScalpX Intel sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @ScalpXIntel have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @ScalpXIntel post?
- Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.