Back to @Sassafrass_84's profile

Sassafrass84 engagement report

@Sassafrass_84 - 644K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.129%
of 644K followers
Per impression
5.79%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
2.23%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
829
interactions (median)
Saved
0.049%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.57/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 829 interactions against 644K followers, an engagement rate of 0.129%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 5.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sassafrass84's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.129%, Sassafrass84 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video71% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 355 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 12, 202646x their median

    Never forget the men that died in Benghazi on 09/11/2012 as their pleas for help were ignored by Hillary Clinton. At what point does any of this matter? It does matter. Say their name. •Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens ~U.S. Ambassador to Libya. • Sean Smith ~State Department information management officer. • Glen Doherty ~former Navy SEAL, security contractor. • Tyrone S. Woods ~former Navy SEAL, security contractor. Their lives mattered.

    27K9.9K681241124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202630x their median

    Strangulation takes up to 5 to 10 minutes until death! Lindsay Clancy did this 3 times to each child, even chasing her little son! She's guilty and criminally responsible for premeditated murder! End of story! https://t.co/WroeTmMN7E

    20K4.0K9752551.8M viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202627x their median

    The case will continue. The judge refuses to clear Lindsay Clancy in the deaths of her 3 children. As it should be. Re-Trial. Mental illness is no excuse to m*rder your children. I can’t stand looking at this woman. https://t.co/ZaYXSIrFoi

    18K2.8K991111133K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20269.3x their median

    Nothing can prepare you for this article. From Feb 2021, Israel was seeing terrible harm from the shots. The warning was sent out in March. This article reports the data, newly released: "Already on March 25, just over three weeks after Israel first sounded the international alarm, the record contained 157 hospitalization reports and 46 death reports. Sixty-five of the hospitalization reports involved myocarditis or pericarditis. By the final version of the dataset, myocarditis or pericarditis appeared in 250 of 531 hospitalization reports, nearly half. Among patients under 30, it appeared in 151 of 211 reports, more than 70%." Authorities in the US knew. They hushed it up and then MANDATED the shot. Again, noting can prepare you for this article. Inside the Safety Record Behind Israel’s Early Myocarditis Warning to Global Health Authorities https://t.co/Tsyom91znf

    5.1K2.3K187170169K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20269.2x their median

    Jelly Roll should have taken some tips from Dolly Parton and stayed out of the political arena. Doesn’t he know that everything woke turns to 💩? It’s your career bro.

    6.5K55347533288K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20266.7x their median

    Sorry, ladies, this is going to be unpopular with some of you, but it needs to be said. The “same Lindsay” types are exactly why women should not be handed positions of real power. One emotional meltdown and it’s bombs away. Especially with liberal American women. Their judgment is consistently broken. Wrong on almost every major issue. No moral compass. Can you imagine if Kamala had actually won? Where would this country be right now? If you can’t regulate your own emotions (whether as a mother or just as an adult) you have no business holding authority over anyone. None. I used to want to see a woman become president. I don’t anymore.

    4.4K7314244946K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20266.5x their median

    Gayle King found out the only juror who wouldn’t let a mom walk for killing her 3 kids… was a Black man. She needed a moment. The diversity hire went off-script and she short circuited. 🤭 https://t.co/5ScI2QIZjs

    4.2K8773003629K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20265.9x their median

    I read this on fb and it really hit hard. A murderer survives a botched execution and gets lifesaving care. A baby survives an abortion and gets left on a tray. How do we have so much compassion for criminals and their suffering while innocent babies get k*lled in the womb? I just don’t get it.

    3.6K1.1K1612220K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.5x their median

    President Trump decided the fly the flags at half mast for 1 week in honor of Dolly Parton. Instead of appreciating the beautiful gesture that our president is doing for our beloved Dolly, the radical left is still being ugly about it. Things said like it should have been you. Wrong 80 year old. There is nothing this man can do that will ever change their minds or at least have compassion and human decency towards him or anything he does. People are truly deranged. Sick. And we have to share a country with these miserable people. What are they going to do when President Trump leaves office? 🤦‍♀️

    3.8K4593492063K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.1x their median

    Just another psa: I also refuse to follow people who sympathize with Lindsay Clancy. She murdered her children. And then the internet dehumanized her babies. There is no excuse in the world that you can give me that would justify what she did to those children. Somebody has to defend the innocent children. And push back against all these disgusting women who support Lindsay. I stand for justice with Cora, Dawson, and Callan.

    3.5K5701851720K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 829 interactions against 644K followers, an engagement rate of 0.129%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 5.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 46x its own typical post.

What is Sassafrass84's engagement rate on X?
Sassafrass84 (@Sassafrass_84) has an engagement rate of 0.129%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 644,095 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.129%, Sassafrass84 sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Sassafrass_84 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Sassafrass_84 post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going