Back to @SarahPerezSanta's profile

Sarah Santaolalla. ♀ engagement report

@SarahPerezSanta - 106K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
4.38%
of 106K followers
Per impression
1.89%
234K views on a typical post
Reach
231.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.019%
45 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.6/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 4.4K interactions against 106K followers, an engagement rate of 4.38%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 234K times each, and 1.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 221.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #audiencias, #exclusiva, #malaslenguasn.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026. Recurring tags: #audiencias, #exclusiva, #malaslenguasn.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sarah Santaolalla. ♀'s engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 4.38%, Sarah Santaolalla. ♀ sits above the 90th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.53% to 82.4%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,225 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video40% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link20% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 40% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 20% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 204 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 20263.8x their median

    ¿En qué momento, entre el «Cara al Sol» y el saludo fascista, han dicho algo por el bien de Ceuta? https://t.co/j6KxSlnwXL

    12K3.5K1.3K2051.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20262.7x their median

    Esto no es periodismo; es basura pagada con dinero público. ¿Alguna vez han seguido a la madre de Ayuso? ¿Alguna vez han perseguido a los hijos de Abascal? ¿Alguna vez han acosado a los padres de Feijóo? La familia no se toca. https://t.co/s9XQPceKah

    7.7K2.2K1.9K97338K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.7x their median

    Qué basura de televisión. Qué basura de personajes que difunden el acoso en la vida privada de las personas. Daís auténtico asco. https://t.co/NN2rsk0Xrv

    8.4K2.3K1.0K93319K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.4x their median

    Sale gratis mentir. Sale gratis difamar. Sale gratis acosar. Sale gratis perseguir. Sale gratis publicar información falsa. Este es el problema. Les sale gratis todo el odio, daño y violencia que ejercen contra las buenas personas.

    4.6K1.2K4.4K225418K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20262.2x their median

    Y así, chicos, es como se humilla a un flipado con micro que intenta violentarte. Pretenden humillarte, pero luego miran tu foto por las noches. https://t.co/q6xmpSdFdo

    6.3K8102.6K232683K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.2x their median

    En el año 2026 un tío de 22 años ha matado a otro de 27 porque pretendió ligar con él... El retroceso que está sufriendo este país es insoportable.

    8.3K1.3K14540152K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20261.8x their median

    Periodismo valiente, independiente y audaz. https://t.co/YtoWve1nuc

    5.4K1.2K1.2K6989K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.7x their median

    🔴 ÚLTIMA HORA / Se confirma la exclusiva adelantada por @El_Plural el pasado 5 de agosto. Ayuso vive en un inmueble ubicado en una excelente urbanización de Madrid. En esta ocasión no es un ático, pero el alquiler superaría los 24.000 euros anuales https://t.co/Op1H9vWsH8

    2.4K1.1K3.5K4591.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.7x their median

    ¿Hay interés periodístico en publicar dónde reside la presidenta Díaz Ayuso (salvo que se hubiera alquilado una sauna de prostitución del padre de Begoña)? La presidenta nunca ha vivido en un ático. Es la primera vez que veo que se persigue dónde vive un político... Increíble

    2.6K6383.7K4672.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.6x their median

    El ático de Chamberí, el palacete de Rascafría, el dúplex del novio o la suite de Sarasola. El modelo de vivienda de Ayuso es el del pelotazo y el chanchullo. Le viene de lejos y todo el mundo lo sabe. Por eso se ofende tanto cuando le recuerdan la deuda de Avalmadrid. https://t.co/ZaIo1CAphn

    4.4K2.2K3784691K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#audiencias#exclusiva#malaslenguasn#nefonline#quevivalatele

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.4K interactions against 106K followers, an engagement rate of 4.38%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 234K times each, and 1.89% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 221.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 20% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 3.8x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #audiencias, #exclusiva, #malaslenguasn.

What is Sarah Santaolalla. ♀'s engagement rate on X?
Sarah Santaolalla. ♀ (@SarahPerezSanta) has an engagement rate of 4.38%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 105,663 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 4.38%, Sarah Santaolalla. ♀ sits above the 90th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SarahPerezSanta have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SarahPerezSanta post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going