Back to @SarahKSilverman's profile

Sarah Silverman engagement report

@SarahKSilverman - 10M followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.007%
of 10M followers
Per impression
0.515%
147K views on a typical post
Reach
1.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
755
interactions (median)
Saved
0.05%
73 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.43/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 755 interactions against 10M followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 147K times each, and 0.515% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 188K interactions, about 250x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #netflix, #postmortem.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #netflix, #postmortem.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sarah Silverman's engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, Sarah Silverman sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,424 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,424 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,888 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 32 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 8, 2025250x their median

    Still one of the best all time videos https://t.co/UqocGocbz4

    163K22K1.5K1.8K9.8M viewsView on X
  • Dec 24, 2024201x their median

    82% of Obamacare applications for 2025 are from states that voted for Trump https://t.co/q0gpmBXzLF

    119K14K1.4K9613.9M viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 2025

    This short video will make you RETHINK your entire life ‼️‼️ https://t.co/wkjJH7SQBN

    98K23K4377741.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 2025

    BILL BURR: “There’s nothing wrong with being a billionaire, but if someone’s working 40 hours/week and can’t make rent you’re not paying them enough… maybe you should just be worth $900 Million. How do you take an 8 figure bonus and none of your employees have dental insurance?” https://t.co/BMVnkAL3rH

    47K9.5K7773322.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2025

    One of the sickest things the US military recruitment does is prey upon kids who grew up very poor. https://t.co/nTKP0vtXtI

    45K10K1.1K586809K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2025

    Our country has fallen‼️ #Fascism https://t.co/iFgCYDsjCV

    41K13K942697572K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2025

    Perfectly said sir. Thank you! https://t.co/FREOQh07Ev

    33K9.9K624492413K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2025

    Jimmy Kimmel's full monologue tonight https://t.co/sZI6uouUAd

    34K7.4K8459364.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 2025

    I think right now I’m leaning Newsom. Where are y’all at? https://t.co/RzlSfTnjsK

    22K4.0K2.3K307834K viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 2025

    If you're a Marine or other service member being mobilized to Los Angeles and you'd like to apply for conscientious objector status, call the GI Rights Hotline to get some guidance on your options: 1-877-447-4487

    18K6.6K1.6K152711K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#netflix#postmortem

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 755 interactions against 10M followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 30% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 147K times each, and 0.515% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 188K interactions, about 250x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #netflix, #postmortem.

What is Sarah Silverman's engagement rate on X?
Sarah Silverman (@SarahKSilverman) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 10,169,779 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, Sarah Silverman sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,424 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SarahKSilverman have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 30% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SarahKSilverman post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going