Back to @SaninPazC's profile

Carolina Sanín engagement report

@SaninPazC - 210K followers on X

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.093%
of 210K followers
Per impression
1.66%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
5.59%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
194
interactions (median)
Saved
0.06%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.97/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 210K followers, an engagement rate of 0.093%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Carolina Sanín's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.093%, Carolina Sanín sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video23% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link11% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 23% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 11% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 222 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 202615x their median

    “We live in the age of search engines that offer us thousands of instantaneous answers. Yet, no matter how powerful they may be, they merely return what already exists and tend to give us what we already want. In the age of technology and consumerism, the great danger is not only censorship but also homogenization, and not merely imposed silence but the noise that makes it impossible to listen. “Art is a different kind of ‘search engine.’ It does not proceed by indexing but by inquiry. Indeed, its inquiry is a focused attention that is not satisfied with the mere sum of facts, for it never ceases to dig deeper, seeking the thread that unites them. Your art, when it resists homogenization, when it draws our gaze, when it compels us to pause before that which cannot be consumed, is a form of cultural and spiritual regeneration.” — Pope Leo XIV

    2.2K555205081K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202612x their median

    Un turista alemán en el café me pregunta qué es lo que estoy tomando. Digo "capuchino". Se lo dice a su compañera, que se ríe. Ambos ríen. Supongo que esperaban que fuera chicha con destilado de tabaco y hormiga. Dios, como odio a los turistas del primer mundo en el tercero.

    2.2K914661K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20269.3x their median

    Si ustedes no leen libros, sino que ven la serie, si no escriben, sino que le piden a Chatgpt que escriba, ¿qué más les da que el gobierno de iletrados cierre el Caro y Cuervo y la Biblioteca Nacional? ¿No ven que es un mismo camino, hipócritas?

    1.5K2661419K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20266.8x their median

    Esas ganas de darles todo a los gringos es propio de alguien que está enamorado del matón que lo somete. Y es un deseo reprimido de que lo penetren. Hablamos de Muñequín.

    1.1K17941124K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20264.7x their median

    Me dan ganas de saber si los profesores de escritura del Caro y Cuervo, tan comprometidos y vociferantes, van a renunciar ante el axabrupto del nuevo director, o si están demasiado comprometidos con sus emolumentos.

    816932320K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20264.7x their median

    Publican una edición conmemorativa de la estupenda novela de Andrés Caicedo "Que viva la música" con un error de ortografía en el título, que cambia el sentido: "Qué viva". Es el odio a la lectura. La soberbia que impide la curiosidad y el cuidado. Ya pongan "Qué linda música". https://t.co/LQFb7DlMx8

    80981101364K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20264.3x their median

    "Timing" se dice, en español, "sentido de la oportunidad". Y es mucho más complejo y preciso y abridor de preguntas que "timing". Tengan un poquito de curiosidad por su lengua, que es magnífica, en vez de querer ser hablantes de inglés de tercera categoría.

    737850818K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20264.2x their median

    Lo de pedirle a la IA que haga imágenes de ustedes como si estuvieran en los años 80 (por cierto, en español se dice "los ochenta", no "los ochentas"), como lo de pedirle cualquier cosa, es de tarados de remate.

    755562216K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263.7x their median

    El arte no es del autor, sino del lector. Por eso es estúpido dejar de leer a alguien porque "me cae mal" o porque es un criminal: es robarse a uno mismo. Despojarse de un regalo.

    615942414K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263.6x their median

    La IA va a terminar siendo para países subdesarrollados solamente. Ya verán. Por eso también es importante no usarla nunca.

    620662315K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 194 interactions against 210K followers, an engagement rate of 0.093%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 1.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.59% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.8K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is Carolina Sanín's engagement rate on X?
Carolina Sanín (@SaninPazC) has an engagement rate of 0.093%, based on the median interactions across 57 original posts from the last 30 days against 209,502 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.093%, Carolina Sanín sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SaninPazC have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SaninPazC post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going