Back to @Sandeman52's profile

SandemanStocks engagement report

@Sandeman52 - 96K followers on X

Measured over 64 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.205%
of 96K followers
Per impression
0.677%
28K views on a typical post
Reach
30.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
192
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.33/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 192 interactions against 96K followers, an engagement rate of 0.205%. Measured over 64 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.677% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 64 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 224x its own typical post.

Measured over 64 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

SandemanStocks's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.205%, SandemanStocks sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video44% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 270 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 21, 2026224x their median

    The Confidence level is insane..💀🔥 https://t.co/gc5x5AF4JP

    39K3.1K7513374.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202638x their median

    She enjoyed the game...until it was her turn🤯 https://t.co/pOz2rJZd7b

    6.8K288130291.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202626x their median

    How Zuck sold AI to the masses Vs. How Dario sold AI to the masses https://t.co/EVjjep01f0

    4.7K22910042295K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202622x their median

    This is not a bubble! https://t.co/RXoKWsw9mH

    3.5K33827377657K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202622x their median

    JUST IN: Gen Z increasingly uses AI for everything from dating advice to workouts & friendship dilemmas. — WSJ

    3.6K208206116219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202619x their median

    This was Nvidia’s first office. Today, Nvidia’s worth $5.4 trillion. https://t.co/3XtwbIJtHJ

    3.5K1304425156K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 202618x their median

    Imagine waking up every Monday, commuting for an hour, then sitting here for 40 years. There are actually people who do this. https://t.co/O0DjpDh3rV

    2.7K18946065283K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202616x their median

    Proposal for American high schools: Replace geometry and trigonometry with economics and statistics.

    2.0K857183121.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202613x their median

    My buddy asked me to explain selling puts to him like he's 5… I used his truck as an example. "You've been eyeing a $30K truck. You'd happily buy it at $25K. Now imagine the dealer paid YOU $500 today, just for promising to buy the truck for $25K if the price ever dropped there. Truck never drops? You keep the $500. Nothing owed. Truck drops to $25K? You buy the truck you wanted anyway, at your price, and you keep the $500." He said: "That sounds too easy. Where's the catch?" There isn't one. That's selling puts. Everyone else gambles on which way the market moves. I just get paid to make promises I was happy to keep anyway.

    2.1K7427320682K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20268.9x their median

    President Trump says he is creating an “AI Force” and will appoint an AI czar, while making clear the U.S. will not slow or stifle AI development. He also says AI could eventually account for as much as 25% of U.S. GDP. https://t.co/eRCAQH0Tkw

    1.4K1549528163K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 192 interactions against 96K followers, an engagement rate of 0.205%. Measured over 64 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.677% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 64 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 43K interactions, about 224x its own typical post.

What is SandemanStocks's engagement rate on X?
SandemanStocks (@Sandeman52) has an engagement rate of 0.205%, based on the median interactions across 64 original posts from the last 30 days against 95,947 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.205%, SandemanStocks sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Sandeman52 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Sandeman52 post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going