Back to @SaleemFarrukh's profile

farrukh saleem engagement report

@SaleemFarrukh - 266K followers on X

Measured over 83 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.035%
of 266K followers
Per impression
1.71%
5.5K views on a typical post
Reach
2.07%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
94
interactions (median)
Saved
0.055%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.4/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 266K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 83 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 1.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 83 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

Measured over 83 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tag: #stayhealthy.

Compared with accounts its own size

farrukh saleem's engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.035%, farrukh saleem sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video48% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link34% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 48% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 34% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 503 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 22, 202612x their median

    UNGA 2026: Bangladesh PM → Turkish Airlines Nepal PM → Qatar Airways Pakistan PM → Special aircraft Same destination Same region Comparable economies https://t.co/THJhzBpXoU

    679356811976K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20268.2x their median

    Since February 28, diesel prices have risen: 🇵🇰 Pakistan: 53.3% 🇮🇳 India: 10.0% 🇧🇩 Bangladesh: 9.6% So what explains Pakistan? https://t.co/cz2NlkWJIb

    449268312615K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20267.7x their median

    1. Pakistan has raised $3 billion from international markets 2. This is Pakistan’s largest-ever international capital-market transaction 3. I think the real story is not $3 billion 4. I think the real story is 10 years 5. A few years ago, the question was: Will they lend to Pakistan? 6. Today, the question is: At what price? 7. What is also important is that Pakistan is replacing “rollover debt” with fixed-maturity debt 8. Pakistan depended on the IMF, Saudi deposits, Chinese rollover, UAE support and multilateral loans. No more.

    5509474754K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20267.1x their median

    1. Pakistan: Rs409/litre 2. Nepal: Rs361 3. Afghanistan: Rs340 4. Sri Lanka: Rs322 5. India: Rs275 6. Bangladesh: Rs259 7. Same region 8. Same global oil market 9. Pakistan now has the most expensive diesel among these six countries 10. Why? 11. The answer matters because diesel is not just fuel 12. Diesel It is the cost of moving the economy

    386224471524K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20265.4x their median

    Gulfstream G500. Lahore–London–Lahore. Guardian Jet variable cost: $5,929/hour • Fuel: $2,857 • Maintenance: $1,648 • Engine programme: $1,424 For 15–16 flying hours: • Aircraft operating cost: Rs2.47–2.64 crore • London parking: Rs0.34–0.35 crore • Airport/navigation/handling: Rs0.15–0.30 crore • Crew: Rs0.05–0.10 crore Direct incremental cost: Rs3.01–3.39 crore Add fair allocation of fixed government-aircraft costs: Rs1.46–1.56 crore Full estimated cost of private use: Rs4.47–4.95 crore Provisional reimbursement benchmark: Rs4.7 crore Commercial charter-equivalent: Rs8–14 crore

    299172212076K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.4x their median

    I am not an expert in this but this is what I see happening: 1. 28th Amendment 2. Removal of Article 239(4) 3. Change the rules of constitutional restructuring 4. Use the new rules to create new provinces/administrative architecture 5. Numbers required: NA–228; Senate–64 6. MNAs and Senators are all ready (as I see it)

    33134371647K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.8x their median

    The $200 billion Karachi: Karachi already produces around $100 billion worth of goods and services every year. Karachi has capital. Karachi has labour. Karachi has location. Karachi has ports. Karachi has industry. Karachi has entrepreneurial energy. Question: Why is Karachi not a $200 billion economy? Answer: Karachi does not have metropolitan economic governance.The Bangkok Metropolitan Administration Act was passed in 1985. Vietnam’s National Assembly granted Ho Chi Minh City a special economic status in 2017. Law 29/2007 formalised Jakarta’s special-capital status. Shenzhen was made a Special Economic Zone in 1980. The Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality was created in 1984. Medellin was given metropolitan authority in 1980. Johannesburg was consolidated into one metropolitan with an executive mayor in 2000 For Karachi, three natural experiments stand out: Shenzhen in 1988, Istanbul in 1984 and Johannesburg in https://t.co/L2rlJJntPW the decade after Shenzhen was granted far greater economic-management powers, its GDP rose from 8.7 billion yuan to 128.9 billion yuan -- an almost 15-fold increase in nominal terms. Istanbul’s economy grew from roughly $17 billion to $36 billion over the decade following the creation of its metropolitan municipality. Johannesburg, after consolidation into a single metropolitan government in 2000, grew from about $25 billion to $51 billion in eight years. For Karachi, the comparison is compelling: moving from $100 billion to $200 billion over a decade requires a doubling -- not a Shenzhen-style miracle, but growth already seen in other metropolitan economies. Bottom line: when economic authority begins to match economic geography, cities acquire the institutional capacity to compound growth.Look closer: Karachi’s problem is fragmentation. A factory in Korangi depends on water from one authority, roads from another, land regulation from another, policing from another and taxation from yet another. Red alert: The economic unit is Karachi -- the governing unit is fragmented.Karachi needs one metropolitan government with economic responsibility for the whole city-region. Land-use planning. Transport. Water. Sewerage. Building regulation. Property taxation. Industrial infrastructure. Investment facilitation. Port-city connectivity. One economy. One authority. One balance sheet. Karachi needs better transport -- better transport widens the labour market. Karachi needs better land use -- better land use raises productivity per acre. Karachi needs reliable water–reliable water lowers industrial costs. Karachi needs faster approvals–faster approvals raise investment. Property taxation and land-value capture finance infrastructure. Port connectivity cuts logistics costs. Here’s the arithmetic: Each reform raises productivity; together they compound growth. A $100 billion economy does not need extraordinary growth to become a $200 billion economy. It needs roughly 7.2 percent annual growth for ten years.The numbers say this: The $200 billion Karachi does not require a miracle. It requires compounding.Please move economic authority to where economic activity takes place. For Karachi, that means: one metropolitan economy, one metropolitan government.The reality: Karachi already has the ingredients of a $200 billion economy. What it lacks is a government designed to unlock them. https://t.co/RS3etnMfCv

    24873261217K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20263.7x their median

    Four questions: 1. Under which specific law was a Punjab government jet used for a private foreign visit? 2. Who authorised the Lahore–London–Lahore flight, and on what written grounds? 3. Were you charged fuel cost, full government cost, or market charter value? 4. If this was legal, can every future Chief Minister use a government jet privately on the same terms?

    21610220106.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.4x their median

    Jan 2022–Aug 2026: 1. Public hospitals in Pakistan: 1,284 2. Army CMH/MH hospitals: 45 (latest official figure I could verify) 3. Civilian hospital fires reported: 13 4. Deaths: 31 5. Military hospital fires reported: 1 6. Deaths: 0 7. This is not a civilian-versus-military argument. 8. It is a governance question. 9. What does one system do differently in maintenance, discipline, command responsibility and fire safety?

    19754591024K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.2x their median

    Does this make sense? https://t.co/483NjZMm7o

    17265521452K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#stayhealthy

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 266K followers, an engagement rate of 0.035%. Measured over 83 original posts, its engagement rate beats 41% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.5K times each, and 1.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 83 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 34% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.1K interactions, about 12x its own typical post.

What is farrukh saleem's engagement rate on X?
farrukh saleem (@SaleemFarrukh) has an engagement rate of 0.035%, based on the median interactions across 83 original posts from the last 30 days against 265,513 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.035%, farrukh saleem sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SaleemFarrukh have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 41% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SaleemFarrukh post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going