Saka engagement report
@Sakjiggy - 340K followers on X
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 14, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 168 interactions against 340K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.839% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 448x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mufc, #ucl, #areyouabaleba.
Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 14, 2026. Recurring tags: #mufc, #ucl, #areyouabaleba.
Compared with accounts its own size
Saka's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.05%, Saka sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 30% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 5% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 30% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 111 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 8, 2026448x their median
🚨 𝗕𝗥𝗘𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗡𝗚: RUBEN AMORIM IS FREAKING OUT! HE HAS NOT WON A SINGLE PRE-SEASON GAME SO FAR, AND NOW HE IS LOSING 3-0 TO CHELSEA! https://t.co/VJhFF0TNpD
- Sep 9, 2026340x their median
🔴🔵🇬🇪 Khvicha Kvaratskhelia with UCL Player of the Season Award from season 2025/26. https://t.co/nBsxf2d7Ld
- Sep 3, 2026235x their median
Good morning, Reds 🫡 https://t.co/UFyhhn7RJ8
- Sep 14, 2026124x their median
Final thing on the offside goal I’m not buying PGMOL’s claim that Matt Donahue VAR simply failed to recognise that Enzo attempted to play the ball He spent a good minute rocking back and forth to see if Enzo got his head to the ball, he physically couldn’t have missed that Enzo attempted to play the ball The reality in my opinion, is that he completely forgot the laws of the game relating to interfering from an offside position. He looked only at whether Enzo touched the ball, because he thought that was the only rule he needed to look at. And THAT, raises enormous questions over the standards of Premier League officials
- Jul 6, 2024116x their median
🏴 1-1 🇨🇭 🇳🇱 2-1 🇹🇷 Booking code -50F8134
- Aug 19, 202667x their median
🚨 🗣️João Pedro on choosing No.9: “The No.9 curse doesn’t scare me it motivates me I asked for it because I want the responsibility of being Chelsea’s main striker. The number doesn’t bring bad luck the player does. I’m here to break the curse and make the No.9 special again."
- Sep 10, 202628x their median
Kobbie https://t.co/VUqklaqP6L
- Sep 9, 202624x their median
At Manchester United open training ahead of Sabah game, everyone in the session apart from Luke Shaw + Matthijs de Ligt. Bruno Fernandes chatting to Jim Thwaites on way out. Harry Amass taking part. #MUFC https://t.co/sCCuDM8Twl
- Aug 13, 202622x their median
One of my current little wins in life is that my job is just 13 minutes away by car, or 45 minutes if I choose to cycle. I can’t stress enough how much this short commute has elevated my quality of life ×2.
- Sep 14, 202616x their median
🚨 Richarlison on Instagram https://t.co/7AhjHnqeiT
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 168 interactions against 340K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.839% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 30% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 5% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 448x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mufc, #ucl, #areyouabaleba.
- What is Saka's engagement rate on X?
- Saka (@Sakjiggy) has an engagement rate of 0.05%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 339,988 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.05%, Saka sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Sakjiggy have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Sakjiggy post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.1 posts per day across the measured window.