Back to @SaiKate108's profile

Kat A 🌸 engagement report

@SaiKate108 - 88K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.83%
of 88K followers
Per impression
7.50%
9.7K views on a typical post
Reach
11.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
727
interactions (median)
Saved
0.155%
15 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.8/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 727 interactions against 88K followers, an engagement rate of 0.83%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 7.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 87K interactions, about 120x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ainonsense, #breaking, #mi26.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026. Recurring tags: #ainonsense, #breaking, #mi26.

Compared with accounts its own size

Kat A 🌸's engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.83%, Kat A 🌸 sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 558 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 2026120x their median

    Men from Ireland, Italy, and Poland have started patrolling their cities to protect women and children from foreign invaders. Do you support these men? https://t.co/pIb5NXh5yO

    70K13K3.5K772692K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 202621x their median

    I am from Norway – Russia is not my enemy. The enemy is the UN, NATO, EU, WEF, and the WHO – as well as our governments and the media – not Russia! https://t.co/oZnBPM78aD

    11K2.8K918168165K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20268.1x their median

    It’s turning out to be the trip from hell for Albanese. The Trump administration just issued a shot across the bow, warning that his Digital Duty of Care bill will be treated as facilitating censorship . Demanding Australia exclude US social media companies like X and YouTube from the bill entirely. We’ve reached the point where Trump has to strong arm Albo in order to protect our free speech public square. Crazy times.

    4.8K8691964074K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20266.7x their median

    Pat Cash is a champion both on and off the court. Awake to the COVID narrative from the start, he tried to warn the tennis world that the mRNA shot was a gene therapy but they refused to listen. Instead he lost sponsorships, contracts and was called a dangerous nutter by MSM. When his mother was vaccine injured, 2 strokes and a heart attack after the jab he knew he had to keep speaking out. Now 5 years on he has signed Dr Aseem Malhotra’s letter to Andy Burnham. Good on him for never backing down.

    3.7K1.0K843666K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20265.8x their median

    Bravo to seasoned Aussie journalist Latika Bourke who just torched Albanese on the global stage 💥💥 Working out of London she is fearless in asking the questions nobody else will. In 2025 she put him on the spot over his lack of direct access to Trump . Remember his ‘don’t verbal me’ response . Now she’s done it again calling him out as the fraud he is. A fraud, a liar and an embarrassment to us all.

    3.5K4971982741K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20263.4x their median

    Media Release: Grants funnelled to Labor seats in new rort. https://t.co/nEEAmZRqVb

    1.9K4269727124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.1x their median

    Today I asked the Pastor at my grandmother’s church a question about William and Christian forgiveness, and he sent me this response. 'It is incorrect and theologically incomplete to tell Prince William that “the Christian thing to do” is simply to forgive Prince Harry without any expectation of repentance or accountability. Many people talk about Christianity without having properly read the Bible or fully understanding the faith. Welcome to my TED Talk. Christian teaching on forgiveness is not a demand for unilateral, consequence-free absolution that ignores justice, truth, or the offender’s responsibility. Scripture repeatedly links forgiveness to repentance. Jesus himself instructs, “If your brother sins, rebuke him, and if he repents, forgive him” (Luke 17:3). The pattern in the New Testament is not passive erasure of wrongs; it is confrontation of the offense followed by genuine turning away from it. To strip repentance out of the equation reduces Christian forgiveness to sentimental permissiveness rather than the costly, transformative act it is meant to be. Demanding that The Prince of Wales extend blanket forgiveness while The Duke of Sussex continues to air grievances, publish damaging material, daily briefing the media, undermining and show no public acknowledgment of harm done to the family/his brother or the institution is not Christian charity—it is enabling. Accountability is not the opposite of forgiveness; it is often its necessary precondition for reconciliation to be real rather than 'performative'. In the parable of the unforgiving servant and in the broader biblical ethic, God forgives the repentant, not those who persist in justifying or monetising the offense. Expecting William to pretend the breaches of trust, public attacks, & ongoing undermining never occurred—or to absorb them indefinitely without any reciprocal movement from Harry—places an asymmetric burden on William that Scripture does not require. True Christian forgiveness does not mean the offended person must immediately restore full relationship, trust, or institutional privileges as if nothing happened. It means releasing any personal internal hurt feelings while still upholding truth and consequences. William can choose not to be upset & still insist that meaningful repair requires Harry to demonstrate repentance—through acknowledgment of specific harms, cessation of further attacks or smeas, and concrete steps toward accountability. That insistence is not un-Christian; it is consistent with the call to speak the truth in love and to protect the family from repeated injury. Pretending otherwise confuses grace with naïveté. Adding further depth: many modern appeals to “just forgive because Jesus said so” selectively quote isolated verses while ignoring the larger biblical narrative of covenant, justice, & restoration. The same tradition that commands forgiveness also contains strong language about confronting hypocrisy & protecting the vunerable. In a family and institutional context as public and consequential as the monarchy, treating Harry’s actions as something William is morally obligated to absorb without any reciprocal change effectively prioritises one man’s narrative over the integrity of the whole. Christian ethics does not demand that Prince William continually lower the bar for the sake of appearances. Forgiveness offered in the absence of repentance may free the forgiver’s heart, but it does not create genuine long term reconciliation, and it is not the full counsel of the Christian faith on the matter. William stand firm in requiring true repentance and accountability before any path to reconciliation is opened, for that is the only way forward that honours both justice and genuine Christian grace. Do not let external voices pressure you into a hollow forgiveness that abandons truth; your strength in upholding these principles protects the integrity of your family and the institution you serve' 1/2

    1.8K2911575073K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20262.4x their median

    The smiling assassin has sold out Australia to the globalist EU, signing the worst trade deal ever. Farmers are devastated as they got a dud quota and Senator Matt Canavan has been opposing it for months. It’s the first time a trade deal has bound Australia, entrenching us even further into the Paris Agreement. It gives the unelected EU power to suspend trade preferences for any violation of Paris! Nobody voted for this !

    1.2K430753019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.2x their median

    I’ve been waiting for Del Bigtree to fire up over the insanity of the bird flu vaccination campaign. And boy he didn’t disappoint. Yet again people have forgotten about the timeless concept of natural immunity. Somehow forgetting that birds have survived for thousands of years, catching bird flu forever and building natural immunity. It would be laughable if there wasn’t a danger in it. Del Bigtree points out we are messing with nature. A leaky vaccine could create more dangerous pathogens that the birds can no longer block. Since we’ve interfered with the immunity they had. Those pathogens could then jump to humans!

    1.1K448451710K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.5x their median

    The childhood vaccination schedule is hanging on by a thread with falling rates worldwide. And the hits keep coming. Steve kirsch has done a new survey of parents re - sudden onset of autism. Reporting 30% of cases in the day after a vaccine. 40% within 2 days. Just like we saw with the McDowell triplets. All three suffered sudden onset of autism within hours of vaccination. Kirsch also notes onset peaks at 18 months coinciding with the last visit in the CDC early schedule and drops off dramatically - by a factor of 30 - at month 19. What they’ve done to hide the link between link between vaccines and autism could well be the greatest and most damaging gaslighting campaign in history.

    68035742259.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ainonsense#breaking#mi26

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 727 interactions against 88K followers, an engagement rate of 0.83%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 86% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 7.50% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.0% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 87K interactions, about 120x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ainonsense, #breaking, #mi26.

What is Kat A 🌸's engagement rate on X?
Kat A 🌸 (@SaiKate108) has an engagement rate of 0.83%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 87,749 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.83%, Kat A 🌸 sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SaiKate108 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 86% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SaiKate108 post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going