Back to @Saboo_Shubham_'s profile

Shubham Saboo engagement report

@Saboo_Shubham_ - 123K followers on X

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.202%
of 123K followers
Per impression
1.44%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
14.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
245
interactions (median)
Saved
1.07%
182 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.83/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 245 interactions against 123K followers, an engagement rate of 0.202%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video, 59% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 42x its own typical post.

Measured over 29 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Shubham Saboo's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.202%, Shubham Saboo sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 277 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 29, 202642x their median

    You can now use your ChatGPT subscription directly in over 16 partners products. No little rules, you can just use all your included usage right there. This includes things such as Devin, OpenCode, Notion, and many more. Sign in with ChatGPT and go.

    9.3K278532174859K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202632x their median

    Introducing Anchor 3.0 by @zerodrift_ai, the first enforcement model built to secure AI agents and keep everything they say compliant at runtime. It caught more compliance violations than every frontier model we tested, up to 34x faster and up to 12x cheaper. Live today, first 1,000 calls free: https://t.co/oyagIt4dn1

    7.2K166588280K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.5x their median

    No biggie. Just Gemini 3.7 flash casually beating Fable 5, Opus 5 and GPT-5.6 on @ArtificialAnlys Analyst Agent benchmark. https://t.co/581O28zQfO

    947429616162K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.9x their median

    Agentic video understanding with Gemini 3.7 Flash is HUGE. Just reduced cost, less tokens, and higher accuracy. No biggie. https://t.co/zEF9B6c4HT

    903407780K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.3x their median

    This is INSANE...We got an Ultrafast browser agent before GTA 6. 100% Opensource.

    7256616550K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.2x their median

    MIT just dropped a new course on "How to AI Almost Anything (Multimodal) AI". 100% free. https://t.co/fWJhDsBvqq

    6759712130K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20263.1x their median

    Stanford dropped a full course on self-improving AI agents. 100% free. https://t.co/oSwRdL8sl2

    6589212435K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.0x their median

    Crazyy...this single CLAUDE md file is now a top-25 GitHub repo of all time. 205,000+ stars. Let that sink in. https://t.co/L6kGsKkoTF

    68132233104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.9x their median

    WILD...the model grades its own answers and beats itself. Stanford's LLM-as-a-Verifier sampled 5 swe-agent trajectories, ranked them with the same model, kept the winner. deepseek-v4-flash went from 78.7% to 88% on terminal-bench without fine-tuning. 100% Opensource. https://t.co/gYsoMKuy5l

    5789030831K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.6x their median

    Crazyy that this even works. Agent Reach gives your Hermes and OpenClaw agents access to X, LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram and more. And it's 100% free and Opensource. https://t.co/sLJZEngzwW

    5645625243K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 245 interactions against 123K followers, an engagement rate of 0.202%. Measured over 29 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.44% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 29 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video, 59% are part of a thread and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 42x its own typical post.

What is Shubham Saboo's engagement rate on X?
Shubham Saboo (@Saboo_Shubham_) has an engagement rate of 0.202%, based on the median interactions across 29 original posts from the last 30 days against 122,924 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.202%, Shubham Saboo sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Saboo_Shubham_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Saboo_Shubham_ post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going