Back to @S_men2024's profile

zero engagement report

@S_men2024 - 387K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
2.27%
of 387K followers
Per impression
3.66%
226K views on a typical post
Reach
62.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
1.04%
2.3K bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 8.3K interactions against 387K followers, an engagement rate of 2.27%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 226K times each, and 3.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 58.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

zero's engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.27%, zero sits above the 90th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.09% to 119.7%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link36% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 36% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 121 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 28, 20262.7x their median

    ๋ฌผ์ด์ฐจ๋ฉด ์ฃผ๊ธฐ์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋นผ์ค˜์•ผ์ง€ ์—ฌ์ž๋„ ๋‚จ์ž๋„ https://t.co/wBl5DbLYWu

    20K2.3K328545K viewsView on X
  • Jun 9, 20262.6x their median

    ๋Œ€๋ฌผ๊ณผ ์„น์Šคํ•˜๊ธฐ์ „ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ๋†ˆ์˜ ์ข†๋ฌผ์„ ํ’ˆ์€์ฑ„๋กœ ๊ธฐ๋‹ค๋ฆฌ๋‹ค @krseung950117 ๐Ÿ† Waiting while holding another guy's cum before having sex with a big dick https://t.co/LCBP8TAhQj

    19K2.6K267650K viewsView on X
  • May 12, 20262.1x their median

    ๋ฐ•ํžˆ๋Š” ๋‚ด๋‚ด ํ’€๋ฐœ์ž์ง€ ์œ ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š” ๋†ˆ ํฌ๋ฆผํŒŒ์ด ๋งŒ๋“ค๊ธฐ ๋ณด์ง€๊ตฌ๋…• ๋ฒŒ๋  Making a cream pie for a man with a gaping hole who stays erect throughout insertion. His pussy is all spread open. https://t.co/g17utRwODD

    16K1.8K277584K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.9x their median

    Getting fucked while pushing all the pussy flesh out Water is gushing out of the urethra and pussy hole Ah, this feels fucking good @Taiton_t ๐Ÿ† 4k full video https://t.co/sEdHM4MPzJ Squirting Version https://t.co/pIu3kPQKvM https://t.co/siULhUaucN

    14K1.9K147199K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20261.8x their median

    ๋ชจ๋‹๋น ๊ตฌ๋ฆฌ ์ด‰์ด‰ํ•˜์ด ์ข‹๋„ค https://t.co/5icbT4Rkqp

    13K1.5K2910351K viewsView on X
  • Jun 20, 20261.6x their median

    ์ –ํƒฑ์ด ํ”๋“ค๋ฆฌ๊ฒŒ ๋ฐ•๊ณ  ๋ฐ•ํžˆ๊ธฐ @g_mguy Caught eye contact while tanning on the beach, had a wild round of sex Fucking and getting fucked until breasts jiggle, cumming https://t.co/qFvvtOaZwC

    12K1.6K191416K viewsView on X
  • Mar 27, 20261.6x their median

    ๋ณด์ง€๊ฐœ๋ฐฉ pussy opening https://t.co/X88KyXQ9wg

    12K98973171.6M viewsView on X
  • May 22, 20261.6x their median

    ๋ณด์ง€๊ตฌ๋…• ํ›„๋น„๋‹ค๊ฐ€ ๊ทผ์œก๋‚จ ์Œฉ์ž์ง€ ๋ง›๋ณด๊ธฐ @Taiton_27 ๐Ÿ† Tasting a muscular guy's bare cock while poking around in the pussy https://t.co/GscykifjnU

    12K1.5K114512K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 2026

    ๋ฅ๋‹ค ๋ถ€๋ž„๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๊ท€๋‘๊นŒ์ง€ ๋นจ์•„์ค„์‚ฌ๋žŒ๐Ÿ˜ https://t.co/daJysMYZ3r

    11K942722299K viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 2026

    ์™•๋ถ€๋ž„ ๊ทผ์œก์ข†๊ฑธ๋ ˆ๋…„ ๋ณด์ง€ ํ„ธ์–ด์ฃผ๊ณ  ๋ฉด์ƒ์— ์ข†๋ฌผ ๋ฟŒ๋ฆฌ๊ธฐ @boycrazybird Big-balled fucking whore, spread your pussy and I'll blast my cum all over your face. https://t.co/3OUrghbXid

    9.8K1.3K122426K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8.3K interactions against 387K followers, an engagement rate of 2.27%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 226K times each, and 3.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 58.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 36% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 22K interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post.

What is zero's engagement rate on X?
zero (@S_men2024) has an engagement rate of 2.27%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 387,031 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.27%, zero sits above the 90th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @S_men2024 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @S_men2024 post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going