Back to @SUPRA_Labs's profile

Supra engagement report

@SUPRA_Labs - 308K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.114%
of 308K followers
Per impression
1.82%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
6.27%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
353
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.13/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 353 interactions against 308K followers, an engagement rate of 0.114%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 1.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video, 29% are part of a thread and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Supra's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.114%, Supra sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video59% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link47% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 59% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 47% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 219 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 22, 20263.9x their median

    Wallet availability update: $SUPRA (ERC-20) support is coming to @MetaMask in the next few days, making it easier for users to access and use $SUPRA through the wallet. More ecosystem availability updates will follow soon. https://t.co/yrSOAyiMmh

    99621513733106K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.7x their median

    Here we go! supra:native is live & verified on Ethereum. supra:native on ETH opens the door to deeper DeFi, more composability, & cross-chain flow for the whole ecosystem. 1 asset, now available on 2 chains. With incentivized DeFi Pools coming soon. Find supra:native on Etherscan: https://t.co/aiYC7wxxvC

    668158923047K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.5x their median

    MAJOR RELEASE: https://t.co/y5h9sJiPPm now moves assets both ways between Ethereum and Supra, using consensus proofs instead of a third-party validator committee. Ethereum → Supra → Ethereum. More Secure. More Powerful. Connecting global liquidity into @SUPRA_Labs . The loop is closed. 🧵 👇

    589183893062K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.1x their median

    Good progress update from the team👀 The final dependency we needed from L1 Mainnet for reverse bridge is now complete. ✅ This week we shipped two node binary releases focused on optimisations + security hardening. Validators are upgraded and inclusion proofs (the key feature required for reverse bridge) are live. We’ll give things a few of days to settle, then aim to launch next week. 🎯 This would mark the first time $SUPRA moves beyond the SUPRA chain, opening up $SUPRA on Ethereum and a whole new set of DeFi possibilities. 🚀 We'll keep you updated! 📰

    523124672378K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20261.9x their median

    Starkey Wallet update: Reverse Bridge is here. 🔁 Both mobile (v5.19.0) and the Chrome extension (v4.11.0) now support Reverse Bridge via SupraNova. Yep, you can now bridge supported assets back through SupraNova directly from your wallet, no extra steps. The loop is closed, and now it lives in your wallet.

    484118631429K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20261.8x their median

    Final checks and balances... 😉

    457571121061K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20261.5x their median

    A little birdie told me that next week is going to be fun for the Supra L1... https://t.co/8c54BZV4De

    3948155930K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 2026

    We've published a general incident report on the July 11 Hedera pull-oracle incident: what happened, what was and wasn't affected, how the attack worked in plain terms, and the fixes now live on mainnet. https://t.co/GUsXjpaFT3

    3946750544K viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 2026

    Starkey Wallet Mobile v5.16.3 is here! 🔐 Here's what's new: • Paste support across Send, Swap, Bridge, Stake & Buy for faster txs • Improved private key security with new "Tap to Reveal" functionality • Load up to 20 wallets with the enhanced "Fetch More Accounts" feature • Smoother navigation with intelligent auto-scrolling & faster loading screens • Performance improvements, bug fixes, and a more polished overall experience 📲 Update to the latest version (iOS and Android) and enjoy a faster, smoother Starkey Wallet experience.🚀

    3717360126K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    We're delighted to welcome @Sandergortjes as Chief Strategy Officer at Supra! 🚨 In today's SUP, @JamesBondsama will ask about his plans & opportunities with SUPRA, his vast experience in Web3, and what comes next. ⏰ 3pm UTC today 📍 Here on X and on YT See ya then! https://t.co/jfn1EGKxD9

    3357032921K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 353 interactions against 308K followers, an engagement rate of 0.114%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 1.82% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.29% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video, 29% are part of a thread and 47% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.4K interactions, about 3.9x its own typical post.

What is Supra's engagement rate on X?
Supra (@SUPRA_Labs) has an engagement rate of 0.114%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 308,437 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.114%, Supra sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SUPRA_Labs have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SUPRA_Labs post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going