Back to @STU_T9's profile

طالب engagement report

@STU_T9 - 62K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.017%
of 62K followers
Per impression
0.48%
2.2K views on a typical post
Reach
3.52%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
10
interactions (median)
Saved
0.137%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 62K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 0.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.6K interactions, about 859x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

طالب's engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.017%, طالب sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 163 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 5, 2026859x their median

    After the final whistle in Al-Ittihad vs Al-Nassr, Al-Ittihad secured the victory. But beyond the result, what touched us the most was seeing Ronaldo notice the players performing Sujood to thank Allah. He also prostrated in gratitude. ❤️☪️ May Allah guide Cristiano Ronaldo to Islam before the end of his playing career!

    7.2K66962268977K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 2026772x their median

    على طاري التسويق مستحيل انسى https://t.co/Z8IH6kOwsn

    7.4K107123431.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 2026656x their median

    المسؤولية ثقيلة .. لكن الأهم أولاً! 🎬 #SupportIttihad https://t.co/vwkny4gQkK

    5.1K95944780686K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202642x their median

    ويبقى السؤال كيف قاعد يكسب بهالاسعار😅 https://t.co/Gc6MkZOZSh

    293381402.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202613x their median

    نصيحه اليوم ماتننظر رد الجميل من شخص تعاملت معاه باصلك وبصفاء نيتك وفطرتك انت سويت الخير لوجه الله مب لاجل يردها وصدقني الشيء الي سويته عمره مايروح يجيك شخص غريب ماتعرفه ولا يعرفك يساعدك باهم وقت بحياتك .. عيش وكمل رحلتك

    11892218K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202612x their median

    طلبات جمهور الاتحاد بسيطة وليست إعجازية كل ما يحتاجه الجمهور هو فريق مُكتمل وقادر على المنافسة.. كيف تريدون من المشجع أن يحضر الملعب ويشجع بشغف وهو يشعر أن فريقه مهمش؟ لغة الأرقام تثبت أنه الفريق الأقل صرفاً بين منافسيه.. وهذا الجمهور العظيم لا يستحق أن يُخذل. #SupportIttihad https://t.co/LdOIF7eZrr

    1134602.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202612x their median

    الحياة لو كان مافيه اسرائيل و ايران و الحوثي https://t.co/py3zwUqrUd

    1102302.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202611x their median

    هذي حتى الغرب ماوصلوها https://t.co/e73hC4czDQ

    1082319.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 202611x their median

    الكتب الحقيقية لا تُقرأ فقط، بل تُعيد بناءنا من الداخل. أنا هاوي بعالم الكتب وما قرأت الكثير للأمانه، لكن أقدر أقول بكل ثقة هذا الكتاب يستحق القراءة كتاب غيرني تمامًا، رتب فوضى أفكاري، وعلمني كيف أكون أقوى من نفسي وأعرف كيف أهذبها وأقودها. الكتاب : صيد الخاطر للإمام الحافظ ابن جوزي رحمة الله

    1051301.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 202610x their median

    كيف تُصبح مُسلمًا غنيًا ؟ https://t.co/KK1lFOpQP9

    972102.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 62K followers, an engagement rate of 0.017%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 20% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.2K times each, and 0.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.54% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.6K interactions, about 859x its own typical post.

What is طالب's engagement rate on X?
طالب (@STU_T9) has an engagement rate of 0.017%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 61,715 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.017%, طالب sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @STU_T9 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 20% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @STU_T9 post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going