Sean Strickland engagement report
@SStricklandMMA - 1.5M followers on X
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 9.0K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.623%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 402K times each, and 2.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 138K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #freealberta, #freeamericafromisrael, #freepalesti̇ne.
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #freealberta, #freeamericafromisrael, #freepalesti̇ne.
Compared with accounts its own size
Sean Strickland's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.623%, Sean Strickland sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 28% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 152 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 7, 202615x their median
I gotta be honest unless things change with the UFC Im kinda over it. McGregor makes 30 million to fight for 30 second and they dont want to pay us a fraction of it. Contemplating just going to 205 knocking out my contract and scrapping with @jakepaul That sounds fun.
- Sep 4, 20267.6x their median
If you're thinking about settling down with a girl and you gotta ask her what she thinks about Lindsay Clancy If it isnt "hang her" Run the fuck away, dont even put your penis in her. Its not worth it
- Jul 25, 20267.1x their median
Voting for Trump will be a life long regret of mine... We were all lied to. https://t.co/Z8ubkCsKLc
- Aug 24, 20266.8x their median
Lindsay Clancy support makes me realize maybe the Salem Witch trials weren't such a bad thing.. The fact this fat ugly bitches in pink shirts are allowed to vote is insanity Repeal the 19th amendment
- Sep 20, 20265.8x their median
MY MAN!!!!! BRO LETS FUCKING GO!!!! Sean Sharaf legend
- Oct 4, 20265.1x their median
Free Palestine should be the official slogan of weak celebrities. Free Palestine from what exactly??? The fact celebrities never say who is doing it shows you how controlled America is. #FreeAmericafromIsrael
- Oct 14, 20264.5x their median
Been in Seattle for 5 minutes and I've become significantly more bigoted....
- Sep 1, 20264.4x their median
Well it looks like women shouldn't be able to vote or be on a jury..... I can only picture 3 men trying to convince 9 women that a woman who admitted to brutally killing her 3 kids is guilty "But what about her feelings" Insane.......
- Oct 12, 20264.2x their median
I cant fucking stand Ariel. I am telling you the moment I stopped supporting israel hes been my number 1 hater... Man went from thanking me for supporting them to my biggest hater lmao Youre the most biased weak man on the internet.
- Aug 18, 20264.1x their median
If you haven't watched Boondocks please do. It really helped me understand poor black culture and how similar it is to poor white culture Change rap to country, weed to beer an opioids and were living the same way
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 9.0K interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.623%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 402K times each, and 2.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 47 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video and 11% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 138K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #freealberta, #freeamericafromisrael, #freepalesti̇ne.
- What is Sean Strickland's engagement rate on X?
- Sean Strickland (@SStricklandMMA) has an engagement rate of 0.623%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,451,748 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.623%, Sean Strickland sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @SStricklandMMA have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @SStricklandMMA post?
- Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.