Back to @SHRM's profile

SHRM engagement report

@SHRM - 185K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 185K followers
Per impression
0.622%
964 views on a typical post
Reach
0.52%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.5/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 185K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 964 times each, and 0.622% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.521% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 87% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 115 interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aiatwork, #hr, #futureofwork.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026. Recurring tags: #aiatwork, #hr, #futureofwork.

Compared with accounts its own size

SHRM's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, SHRM sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video93% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link87% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 87% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 279 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 6, 202519x their median

    If it’s a WORK thing, it’s a SHRM thing. Work is more than tasks—it’s an art where people and policies shape something meaningful. #SHRM helps you master this craft with tools to build better workplaces and a better world. Turn to SHRM: https://t.co/WNTkPK4wNL https://t.co/L44Gz7NQCS

    631929419K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.8x their median

    SHRM predicted 7 workplace trends for 2026. Midyear check: AI sharpens reviews rather than replacing them, upskilling urgency rises while execution stays uneven, and AI-flooded hiring makes internal talent an edge. Assumptions won't hold. Recalibrate: https://t.co/Ty5l38nZCs https://t.co/DwrEAS7S2G

    124012.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20262.7x their median

    Happy #NationalInternDay! Our 2026 SHRM cohort arrived from different schools and starting points, but showed up with the same drive to learn and grow. Different paths, same impact. How's your org building its talent pipeline? Get guidance here: https://t.co/xpvIkcR90j https://t.co/wIyua7TbbS

    81613.1K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20262.7x their median

    We asked #SHRM26 attendees: what's one thing you do to emphasize the human in HR? Their answers: → Real 1:1 conversations → Asking about people's lives, not just their to-do lists → Picking up the phone instead of another email How do you put people first? https://t.co/15FtYFpqh3

    113111.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.5x their median

    As we approach the last few days of National Civility Month, consider this. Workplace incivility reached an all-time high this summer, in society and at work. Explore all SHRM’s latest trend insights here: https://t.co/JRF67pRash https://t.co/mt5Sjc3g11

    83311.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20262.3x their median

    We're keeping a pulse on the latest workplace trends — and this one might surprise you. 66% of workers across 26 countries report low concern about AI leading to job loss in the next year. That's what's on our radar. What's on yours? #AIatWork #FutureOfWork #HR #WorkplaceTrends https://t.co/r6HBnfMpHq

    61701.1K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20262.3x their median

    Freedom shows up in the dignity of work: showing up, working hard, building something that lasts. Our CEO @JohnnyCTaylorJr reminds us freedom isn't just celebrated, it's practiced every day through the effort people give. We're proud to support #Freedom250 https://t.co/KZLjiCvI37 https://t.co/61l95lDQNi

    93111.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20262.2x their median

    Twenty-five years later, we remember September 11, 2001 — a day that changed our nation and continues to shape generations and communities. Today, we honor the lives lost and reflect on the resilience that has carried us forward. #September11 #NeverForget https://t.co/mBJZa70ADZ

    93101.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.2x their median

    Respect is a retention strategy. Is your team treating it like one? Explore SHRM's Civility Insights and Resources: https://t.co/43xRC2IcVF https://t.co/yxtigzcV2L

    65201.2K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 20261.5x their median

    Civility isn't a soft skill, it's a strategic imperative. The 2026 Q2 Civility Index: 76% of workers faced incivility last month. Incivility costs orgs $2.6B/day. Where's your biggest opportunity to strengthen culture? Explore the full Q2 findings: https://t.co/iXoEjExGbc https://t.co/rsL3PmEx4V

    71401.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#aiatwork#hr#futureofwork#hrleadership#aiinhr

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 185K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 964 times each, and 0.622% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.521% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.5 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 87% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 115 interactions, about 19x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aiatwork, #hr, #futureofwork.

What is SHRM's engagement rate on X?
SHRM (@SHRM) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 184,929 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, SHRM sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SHRM have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SHRM post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going