Back to @SChimamoto's profile

shelby chimamoto🇺🇸🦅 engagement report

@SChimamoto - 122K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.003%
of 122K followers
Per impression
0.67%
448 views on a typical post
Reach
0.37%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.3/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 122K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 448 times each, and 0.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.366% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 471K interactions, about 156924x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

shelby chimamoto🇺🇸🦅's engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.003%, shelby chimamoto🇺🇸🦅 sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,596 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,062 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 94 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 21, 2025156924x their median

    You can’t take our country — and you can’t take our game.

    365K43K48K15K55M viewsView on X
  • Apr 14, 202612443x their median

    It's fascinating to see what social media reveals about a person before they become the Pope. Before he became Pope Leo XIV, Cardinal Robert Prevost was on Twitter trashing Trump, criticizing Vance, calling for open borders, promoting COVID vaccines, endorsing stricter gun control, and tweeting after George Floyd: "We need to hear more from leaders in the Church, to reject racism and seek justice." The account was deleted the day he was elected.

    24K11K8947711.2M viewsView on X
  • Nov 15, 20222187x their median

    #TRUMP2024ToSaveAmerica #ULTRAMAGA https://t.co/uJ0Y1QCpiN

    4.3K1.4K727105View on X
  • Jun 5, 202613x their median

    POISONED BY DESIGN: The 80-Year Plan to Control America Through Its Food... https://t.co/HiQfvxZRYo via @YouTube

    334213.3K viewsView on X
  • May 15, 202612x their median

    Tough to be America's 1st gay president. https://t.co/TnqNSilsxZ

    275301.3K viewsView on X
  • May 20, 202610x their median

    Does Fasting Really Extend Your Life? — A Top Aging Scientist Weighs In https://t.co/Q4uS6i63Gw via @YouTube

    244202.8K viewsView on X
  • Apr 27, 20267.7x their median

    "Help, I can't shit!" https://t.co/SHaOyzWAtB

    20120970 viewsView on X
  • Apr 17, 20267.7x their median

    The Hidden Windows Folder: Access Every Setting in One Click https://t.co/vozXyx5cuU via @YouTube

    193101.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20267.0x their median

    Why Cutting ALL Fat Is Starving YOUR Brain https://t.co/nVK4WVqp6e via @YouTube

    153301.4K viewsView on X
  • Mar 5, 20267.0x their median

    Trump & Bibi Just Torpedoed Iran's Secret War Plan https://t.co/CpTwqIfgxg via @YouTube

    191102.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 122K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 448 times each, and 0.67% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.366% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 471K interactions, about 156924x its own typical post.

What is shelby chimamoto🇺🇸🦅's engagement rate on X?
shelby chimamoto🇺🇸🦅 (@SChimamoto) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 122,381 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.003%, shelby chimamoto🇺🇸🦅 sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,596 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SChimamoto have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SChimamoto post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going