nini engagement report
@SCUDERIAFEMBOY - 95K followers on X
Measured over 93 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.5K interactions against 95K followers, an engagement rate of 2.68%. Measured over 93 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 8.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 93 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 17% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aura, #careerdefining, #gulp.
Measured over 93 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 18, 2026. Recurring tags: #aura, #careerdefining, #gulp.
Compared with accounts its own size
nini's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 2.68%, nini sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.55% to 82.4%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 75% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 1% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 90 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 16, 202611x their median
this fucking start dude 😭😭 https://t.co/mj4n55TeNE
- Sep 16, 20264.8x their median
there’s people wondering if the machinery was truly equal…… i can’t believe i have to ask this but have you considered its random people who maybe drove a go kart at a birthday party once vs a guy who spent years competitively doing so?????? 😭😭😭😭😭
- Aug 23, 20264.7x their median
not even joking its RIGHT in front of me LMFAOOO https://t.co/IXiE1eabBi
- Sep 16, 20264.5x their median
“so we‘ll prep for max vs 200 then?” max: “200, exactly!” https://t.co/f3ChDPbCfs
- Sep 16, 20264.4x their median
alsop: “i’m a little bit busy now max, can you call back later?” max: “yeah sure mate i’m available whenever” 😭😭 https://t.co/NFfJfIBWKQ
- Aug 23, 20264.2x their median
i feel like you guys should know that once max got out of the car we all started singing dudududu max verstappen and he waved to us 😖
- Sep 14, 20263.7x their median
you’re joking.. somebody made a max hello kitty https://t.co/gXuqcO1Sa0
- Aug 23, 20263.6x their median
secured his 100% finish to podium rate at zandvoort by DNFing #AURA https://t.co/63WnNApkrq
- Aug 24, 20263.4x their median
that fucking tyre rolling in the background is still killing meeeee https://t.co/9LdhDQirmc
- Aug 25, 20263.3x their median
he yearned for that vacation 😭😭😭😭 https://t.co/ZSruzLHyTH
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.5K interactions against 95K followers, an engagement rate of 2.68%. Measured over 93 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 31K times each, and 8.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 32.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 93 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 17% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 11x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #aura, #careerdefining, #gulp.
- What is nini's engagement rate on X?
- nini (@SCUDERIAFEMBOY) has an engagement rate of 2.68%, based on the median interactions across 93 original posts from the last 30 days against 95,102 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 2.68%, nini sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @SCUDERIAFEMBOY have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @SCUDERIAFEMBOY post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.03 posts per day across the measured window.