Back to @SCOTUSblog's profile

SCOTUSblog engagement report

@SCOTUSblog - 577K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.015%
of 577K followers
Per impression
0.429%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
3.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
85
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.97/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 85 interactions against 577K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.429% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 590 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

SCOTUSblog's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.015%, SCOTUSblog sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,465 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.67%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,465 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,898 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.67%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video4% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link96% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 4% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 96% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 209 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 24, 20266.9x their median

    The Supreme Court on Monday afternoon cleared the way for the Trump administration to begin implementing an executive order, signed by President Donald Trump earlier this year, that imposes restrictions on mail-in voting. https://t.co/sS1MnyKFu8

    42286681440K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20266.2x their median

    By a vote of 5-4, the Supreme Court paused a ruling by a federal judge in Washington, D.C., that would have halted above-ground construction of the new White House ballroom. https://t.co/QlXAjDFQ6f

    40364541042K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20264.1x their median

    The Supreme Court on Monday declined to allow the U.S. Postal Service to carry out parts of a new rule on mail-in voting. https://t.co/E8nJIhefzK

    22656551333K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20263.7x their median

    The Supreme Court on Monday announced that Justice Samuel Alito will not continue to participate in Suncor Energy Inc. v. County Commissioners of Boulder County, a significant dispute that will be argued in just one week. https://t.co/maoxG67Gqb

    2614015254K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20263.7x their median

    Johnny Brown, Justice Jackson’s father, passes away at 80 https://t.co/FDzN0TFCr2

    2394922839K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.3x their median

    Although the briefs Sauer has filed and the arguments he has made before the justices have at times seemed unorthodox – appearing to echo language used by Trump himself – he has largely appeared to pull off a tricky balancing act. https://t.co/Pu0mO6fdTR

    2194413570K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20263.1x their median

    Court declines to hear cases on “Let’s Go Brandon” sweatshirts, felons’ Second Amendment rights, COVID-19 vaccine mandates, and other notable issues https://t.co/hOkbOHA9Yt

    1955110740K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.0x their median

    The court on Monday turned down President Donald Trump’s request to reconsider the justices’ denial of review in a civil suit brought by journalist E. Jean Carroll, which yielded a $5 million verdict against the president. https://t.co/GyaONDPso6

    1615532829K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20263.0x their median

    Justice Kavanaugh turns down request from Missouri to use congressional map expected to aid Republicans https://t.co/gN6nvkmmi6

    1904414423K viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 20262.0x their median

    Court grants several new cases, including on whether the Second Amendment protects possession of semiautomatic rifles https://t.co/55vzjGDFxD

    1423468740K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 85 interactions against 577K followers, an engagement rate of 0.015%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 0.429% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 590 interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post.

What is SCOTUSblog's engagement rate on X?
SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) has an engagement rate of 0.015%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 576,521 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.015%, SCOTUSblog sits above the 10th percentile of the 200,465 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SCOTUSblog have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SCOTUSblog post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going