SC Media engagement report
@SCMagazine - 119K followers on X
Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 119K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 820 times each, and 0.244% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.688% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12 interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cybersecurity, #infosec, #ciso.
Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #cybersecurity, #infosec, #ciso.
Compared with accounts its own size
SC Media's engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 13% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.002%, SC Media sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 243 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 4, 20266.0x their median
.@Mandiant and @Google's Threat Intelligence Group reported that attackers exploited a Citrix NetScaler zero-day weeks before a patch, deploying novel malware to gain root access, steal credentials and move laterally. #cybersecurity #CISO #infosec https://t.co/RQmD7oIogl
- Oct 5, 20265.0x their median
.@okta says securing #AI agents will take an industry, not a single vendor. Its Blueprint Alliance aims to build open standards for identity, access and agent governance. #cybersecurity #CISO #infosec https://t.co/csM7xtLvCW
- Oct 3, 20265.0x their median
Malicious Custom GPTs posed as ChatGPT to steer victims to a ClickFix site, triggering an eight-stage attack chain that deployed remote access malware, reported @HuntressLabs. #cybersecurity #CISO #infosec https://t.co/cxlhWl63de
- Oct 4, 20264.5x their median
A fake Zoom installer is spreading the new CloudSyncD macOS backdoor, tricking users into bypassing Gatekeeper and handing over their passwords, reported @JamfSoftware. #cybersecurity #CISO #infosec https://t.co/uKNRPaxLTP
- Oct 3, 20264.5x their median
The @CISAgov warns attackers are exploiting a critical Cisco SD-WAN Manager flaw that can give unauthenticated remote attackers admin-level access. #cybersecurity #CISO #infosec https://t.co/xwmDrGh7IS
- Oct 4, 20264.0x their median
#AI agents can appear and disappear in minutes, but accountability can’t. Security teams need unique agent identities, clear human owners and lifecycle visibility, says @barracuda's Peterson Gutierrez in this op-ed. #cybersecurity #CISO #infosec https://t.co/HZUgtxwrqF
- Oct 5, 20263.5x their median
A third exploited NetScaler flaw in a week shows attackers are moving faster than patch cycles. Defenders should patch, hunt for compromise and secure systems behind the gateway. #cybersecurity #CISO #infosec https://t.co/myCwm4gPs8
- Oct 4, 20263.5x their median
In cloud-native environments, the network perimeter won’t stand still. #ZeroTrust must follow workload identity with attestation, microsegmentation and continuous risk assessment, says the @TexasHHSC's Saravana Kumar Murugesan in this op-ed. #cybersecurity https://t.co/WSAzChXzIs
- Oct 1, 20263.0x their median
.@Mandiant and @Google's Threat Intelligence Group reported that attackers exploited a Citrix NetScaler zero-day weeks before a patch, deploying novel malware to gain root access, steal credentials and move laterally. #cybersecurity #CISO #infosec https://t.co/RQmD7oIogl
- Sep 30, 20263.0x their median
APIs were built for predictable applications. #AI agents change the equation. Financial firms need stronger identity, permissions and guardrails before agents act at machine speed, says @viewtrade's Sergei Lishchenko in this op-ed. #cybersecurity #infosec https://t.co/gsKmjmLbpE
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 119K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 6% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 820 times each, and 0.244% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.688% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12 interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cybersecurity, #infosec, #ciso.
- What is SC Media's engagement rate on X?
- SC Media (@SCMagazine) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 60 original posts from the last 30 days against 119,259 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.002%, SC Media sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @SCMagazine have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 6% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @SCMagazine post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.