Back to @SCJudgments's profile

Latest Supreme Court Judgments engagement report

@SCJudgments - 253K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 253K followers
Per impression
0.127%
2.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.94%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 253K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 0.127% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.937% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10 interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #supremecourt, #appeal, #civil.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 9, 2026. Recurring tags: #supremecourt, #appeal, #civil.

Compared with accounts its own size

Latest Supreme Court Judgments's engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 9% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Latest Supreme Court Judgments sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 227 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 20263.3x their median

    02/09/26 - Fisherman Care Vs. The Government of India, Department of Animal Husbandry, Dairying and Fisheries represented by its Secretary [Special Leave Petition (C) No. 8442 of 2021] Constitution of India Seventh Schedule List I Entry 57: https://t.co/vYJQc3DsYF #SLP #Civil #SupremeCourt

    73005.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.7x their median

    02/09/26 - Mahavir @ Avnish Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh [Criminal Appeal No.__________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (Criminal) No. 5654 of 2026] IPC Section 302: https://t.co/TT5iyxg3MA #Criminal #Appeal #SupremeCourt https://t.co/QuGrYBDb0J

    52104.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.3x their median

    03/09/26 - Sandeep S. Ghandat Vs. Reserve Bank of India [Civil Appeal Nos. 5351 - 5352 of 2025] Banking Regulation Act Section 36AAA: https://t.co/p9tjOnXbO1 #Civil #Appeal #SupremeCourt https://t.co/mdOtp6etT5

    11502.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.7x their median

    02/09/26 - Bijendra Vs. Rekha [Civil Appeal No. 10249 of 2014] Hindu Marriage Act Section 13: https://t.co/b3yrEWMMAj #Civil #Appeal #SupremeCourt https://t.co/AiNXn1lwxg

    32003.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    07/09/26 - Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. Vs. The District Revenue Officer (Stamps) [Civil Appeal No.________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (C) No. 37096 of 2025] Indian Stamp Act, 1899, Section 47-A: https://t.co/SdM7sDGks7 #Civil #Appeal #SupremeCourt https://t.co/tuz04zIL4q

    31003.5K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 2026

    03/09/26 - Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Priyanka Das [Civil Appeal No. 12085 of 2026] Motor Vehicles Act: https://t.co/BT8pou2MTY #Civil #Appeal #SupremeCourt https://t.co/O3a38yljI8

    12103.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    02/09/26 - Vijay Ghanshyam Gadiya Vs. Union of India [Civil Appeal No._________ of 2026 arising out of SLP (Civil) No. 15605 of 2026] Customs Act 1962 Section 114: https://t.co/MCsoHneZUY #Civil #Appeal #SupremeCourt https://t.co/jPyBRNGYDL

    31004.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    02/09/26 - M.R.R. Setty (D) by LRS. Vs. Government of Karnataka [Civil Appeal Nos.______&_______ of 2026 @ SLP (C) Nos. 23954-23955 of 2023] Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964, Section 56: https://t.co/0Feh5mlern #Civil #Appeal #SupremeCourt https://t.co/yKAb32j9hX

    22003.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    24/08/26 - R. Manimaran Vs. State of Tamil Nadu [Criminal Appeal No.________ of 2026 @ SLP (Crl.) No. 18633 of 2025] NDPS Act Section 52A: https://t.co/LXzuEgBqmi #Criminal #Appeal #SupremeCourt

    31001.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    01/09/26 - V. Balakrishnan Vs. State represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police [Criminal Appeal No. 2460 of 2026] IPC Section 420: https://t.co/8aXka22iLq #Criminal #Appeal #SupremeCourt https://t.co/auDKOzFMwB

    31002.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#supremecourt#appeal#civil#criminal#mooting

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 253K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 7% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 0.127% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.937% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10 interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #supremecourt, #appeal, #civil.

What is Latest Supreme Court Judgments's engagement rate on X?
Latest Supreme Court Judgments (@SCJudgments) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 252,775 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Latest Supreme Court Judgments sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SCJudgments have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 7% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SCJudgments post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going