Back to @SBPCnet's profile

SBPC engagement report

@SBPCnet - 169K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 169K followers
Per impression
1.83%
219 views on a typical post
Reach
0.13%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 219 times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.129% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 331 interactions, about 83x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026. Recurring tag: #jornaldaciência.

Compared with accounts its own size

SBPC's engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, SBPC sits below the 10th percentile of the 206,113 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 206,113 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,273 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link57% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 57% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 235 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 20, 202683x their median

    Carta de cientistas brasileiros em apoio a Lula supera 10,5 mil assinaturas e reúne 13 entidades nacionais Saiba mais no #JornalDaCiência: https://t.co/gYmu4JeNjA Foto: Ricardo Stuckert https://t.co/nvibM7KxSa

    213110532.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 202612x their median

    Oito entidades científicas, acadêmicas e universitárias divulgam Carta Aberta ao Tribunal Superior Eleitoral em defesa da integridade e do equilíbrio das eleições de 2026. Leia no #JornalDaCiência: https://t.co/cRHnxgMT6q Foto: Aurimar Silva/TRE-SP https://t.co/s18kSrDkKI

    251920732 viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20266.8x their median

    SBPC e ABC manifestam apoio à mobilização da juventude em defesa da democracia Saiba mais no #JornalDaCiência: https://t.co/vzi63swyup https://t.co/GRel6EjWX8

    20610468 viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20266.5x their median

    O Brasil do futuro: que País queremos deixar para as próximas gerações? Neste vídeo, Helena Nader, presidente da @ABCiencias, convida a uma reflexão sobre as escolhas que fazemos hoje e suas consequências para as próximas gerações. A Ciência Pergunta. O Brasil Decide. https://t.co/ye6hyhIspu

    15920345 viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20265.8x their median

    Lula responde às dez questões da comunidade científica apresentadas pelo Observatório das Eleições 2026 Leia no #JornalDaCiência https://t.co/ZRvvFvGOep Foto: Ricardo Stuckert/Fotos Públicas https://t.co/GFQBdprU7r

    16700321 viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20264.8x their median

    Quais políticas o seu candidato defende para o fortalecimento do SUS? Neste vídeo, José Gomes Temporão, pesquisador da Fiocruz e ex-ministro da Saúde destaca a importância das políticas voltadas ao cuidado da população. A Ciência Pergunta. O Brasil Decide. https://t.co/Ll02uzJeWK

    13420337 viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20264.5x their median

    Carta das entidades científicas ao TSE para mais equilíbrio e transparência nas decisões sobre as eleições de 2026 chega a mais de 60 adesões Saiba mais no #JornalDaCiência: https://t.co/PKmwit6OZ0 https://t.co/DV6J821VXC

    13500223 viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20263.8x their median

    🗳️ Democracia, desinformação e segurança: que futuro queremos para o Brasil? Neste vídeo, Francilene Garcia, presidente da SBPC, alerta para os riscos da desinformação, da intolerância e do autoritarismo para a democracia brasileira. A Ciência Pergunta. O Brasil Decide. https://t.co/mwSBeZyjJa

    8700234 viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 20263.3x their median

    Qual ajuste fiscal é necessário para o desenvolvimento do Brasil? Neste vídeo, Tânia Bacelar, professora da UFPE critica o projeto econômico da extrema-direita que defende um corte aproximado de 2% do PIB (Produto Interno Bruto) das despesas obrigatórias do Estado. https://t.co/3emHPLmRwp

    8500231 viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20263.3x their median

    🔬 Investimento em ciência: como garantir recursos, valorizar pesquisadores e impulsionar o desenvolvimento do Brasil? Neste vídeo, Enio Pontes de Deus, professor titular da UFC, destaca a importância da ciência para a vida cotidiana e o desenvolvimento nacional. https://t.co/2vRD4mxqnB

    8410250 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#jornaldaciência

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 219 times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.129% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 331 interactions, about 83x its own typical post.

What is SBPC's engagement rate on X?
SBPC (@SBPCnet) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 169,230 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, SBPC sits below the 10th percentile of the 206,113 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @SBPCnet have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @SBPCnet post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going