SBPC engagement report
@SBPCnet - 169K followers on X
Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 219 times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.129% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 331 interactions, about 83x its own typical post.
Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 21, 2026. Recurring tag: #jornaldaciência.
Compared with accounts its own size
SBPC's engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 60% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.002%, SBPC sits below the 10th percentile of the 206,113 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.68% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 57% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 57% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 235 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 20, 202683x their median
Carta de cientistas brasileiros em apoio a Lula supera 10,5 mil assinaturas e reúne 13 entidades nacionais Saiba mais no #JornalDaCiência: https://t.co/gYmu4JeNjA Foto: Ricardo Stuckert https://t.co/nvibM7KxSa
- Oct 11, 202612x their median
Oito entidades científicas, acadêmicas e universitárias divulgam Carta Aberta ao Tribunal Superior Eleitoral em defesa da integridade e do equilíbrio das eleições de 2026. Leia no #JornalDaCiência: https://t.co/cRHnxgMT6q Foto: Aurimar Silva/TRE-SP https://t.co/s18kSrDkKI
- Oct 9, 20266.8x their median
SBPC e ABC manifestam apoio à mobilização da juventude em defesa da democracia Saiba mais no #JornalDaCiência: https://t.co/vzi63swyup https://t.co/GRel6EjWX8
- Oct 13, 20266.5x their median
O Brasil do futuro: que País queremos deixar para as próximas gerações? Neste vídeo, Helena Nader, presidente da @ABCiencias, convida a uma reflexão sobre as escolhas que fazemos hoje e suas consequências para as próximas gerações. A Ciência Pergunta. O Brasil Decide. https://t.co/ye6hyhIspu
- Oct 16, 20265.8x their median
Lula responde às dez questões da comunidade científica apresentadas pelo Observatório das Eleições 2026 Leia no #JornalDaCiência https://t.co/ZRvvFvGOep Foto: Ricardo Stuckert/Fotos Públicas https://t.co/GFQBdprU7r
- Oct 14, 20264.8x their median
Quais políticas o seu candidato defende para o fortalecimento do SUS? Neste vídeo, José Gomes Temporão, pesquisador da Fiocruz e ex-ministro da Saúde destaca a importância das políticas voltadas ao cuidado da população. A Ciência Pergunta. O Brasil Decide. https://t.co/Ll02uzJeWK
- Oct 14, 20264.5x their median
Carta das entidades científicas ao TSE para mais equilíbrio e transparência nas decisões sobre as eleições de 2026 chega a mais de 60 adesões Saiba mais no #JornalDaCiência: https://t.co/PKmwit6OZ0 https://t.co/DV6J821VXC
- Oct 20, 20263.8x their median
🗳️ Democracia, desinformação e segurança: que futuro queremos para o Brasil? Neste vídeo, Francilene Garcia, presidente da SBPC, alerta para os riscos da desinformação, da intolerância e do autoritarismo para a democracia brasileira. A Ciência Pergunta. O Brasil Decide. https://t.co/mwSBeZyjJa
- Oct 20, 20263.3x their median
Qual ajuste fiscal é necessário para o desenvolvimento do Brasil? Neste vídeo, Tânia Bacelar, professora da UFPE critica o projeto econômico da extrema-direita que defende um corte aproximado de 2% do PIB (Produto Interno Bruto) das despesas obrigatórias do Estado. https://t.co/3emHPLmRwp
- Oct 16, 20263.3x their median
🔬 Investimento em ciência: como garantir recursos, valorizar pesquisadores e impulsionar o desenvolvimento do Brasil? Neste vídeo, Enio Pontes de Deus, professor titular da UFC, destaca a importância da ciência para a vida cotidiana e o desenvolvimento nacional. https://t.co/2vRD4mxqnB
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 169K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 11% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 219 times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.129% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 331 interactions, about 83x its own typical post.
- What is SBPC's engagement rate on X?
- SBPC (@SBPCnet) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 169,230 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.002%, SBPC sits below the 10th percentile of the 206,113 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @SBPCnet have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 11% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @SBPCnet post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.