Back to @RvN1776's profile

Ruud van Nistelrooij engagement report

@RvN1776 - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.299%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
4.04%
103K views on a typical post
Reach
7.41%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4.2K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
44 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.07/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 4.2K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.299%. Posts are seen about 103K times each, and 4.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 212K interactions, about 51x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.299%, Ruud van Nistelrooij sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,862 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.142% to 0.672%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.672%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,862 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.672%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 33 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 13, 202451x their median

    Back home, new chapter. โค๏ธ๐Ÿค๐Ÿ–ค@ManUtd https://t.co/VsRI5JatdJ

    186K21K3.0K2.0K4.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202231x their median

    With the gaffer at Ibrox after the game. ๐Ÿ’ฏ https://t.co/635rZ0StJS

    122K5.3K834714View on X
  • Nov 15, 202428x their median

    โ€œTo everyone at Manchester United Football Club, in particular the backroom staff, the players and the fans. I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart for your incredible efforts and support. It has been a privilege and honour to represent the club as a player, coach and manager, and I will always cherish the memories we have shared together. @ManUtd will always have a special place in my heart, and I hope there are many more glory days at Old Trafford very soon - not only because I want the club to do well, but because you all deserve it! All the best and take care, Ruud.

    99K14K3.2K1.4K2.5M viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 2024

    Ruuuuud!!!!!!!!! โค๏ธ @ManUtd https://t.co/5O7b04FalL

    99K6.5K4281621.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202223x their median

    4-1.. Good way to start the the Eredivisie. https://t.co/wXAt9mhbyw

    90K3.1K748931View on X
  • Aug 18, 202421x their median

    Great team performence +3. โค๏ธ๐Ÿค๐Ÿ–ค @ManUtd https://t.co/7HyZlyyKDt

    82K4.8K6152241.6M viewsView on X
  • Oct 25, 202418x their median

    โ€˜We are @ManUtd and weโ€™re never gonna stopโ€™ ๐Ÿ™Œ๐Ÿผ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿผ https://t.co/0B1aIGF5X1

    67K4.7K1.8K1.3K2.9M viewsView on X
  • May 19, 202513x their median

    https://t.co/BFh3u3ze0K

    53K1.8K5835757K viewsView on X
  • Nov 3, 202412x their median

    โค๏ธ๐Ÿค๐Ÿ–ค @ManUtd https://t.co/4HmqH6cSdD

    47K2.2K4881161.1M viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 202211x their median

    Enhorabuena y merecido querido Karim! ๐Ÿค๐Ÿ’œ #Ballondor https://t.co/VAHPqLsjZE

    42K3.3K93111View on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4.2K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.299%. Posts are seen about 103K times each, and 4.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.41% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.07 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 212K interactions, about 51x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Ruud van Nistelrooij's engagement rate on X?
Ruud van Nistelrooij (@RvN1776) has an engagement rate of 0.299%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,395,434 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.299%, Ruud van Nistelrooij sits above the 50th percentile of the 201,862 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RvN1776 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @RvN1776 post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going