Back to @RussoHockey's profile

Michael Russo engagement report

@RussoHockey - 206K followers on X

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.047%
of 206K followers
Per impression
0.651%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
7.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
97
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.87/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 97 interactions against 206K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.651% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 638 interactions, about 6.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mnwild, #letsgobuffalo.

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #mnwild, #letsgobuffalo.

Compared with accounts its own size

Michael Russo's engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 32% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.047%, Michael Russo sits above the 25th percentile of the 203,096 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.674%
p902.54%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 203,096 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.674%
90th percentile2.54%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video12% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 12% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 111 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 9, 20266.6x their median

    Crazy to think Sept. 5 was my 9-year anniversary at @TheAthletic. Incredible place to work. Entering my 32nd year covering the NHL https://t.co/ErFAlVfvf0

    5835464103K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20265.7x their median

    Quinn Hughes is having such a stellar game in all 3 zones

    5151622422K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20265.6x their median

    Jared Spurgeon picked up his 139th power-play point, an all-time record for Wild defensemen. Spurgeon now owns every Wild D record in Wild history.

    4804431219K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20265.3x their median

    Wallstedt: It’s a hard one to digest right now. Over 64 and a half minutes, I don’t know if we 100 percent deserved to win today. It didn’t feel like we had our best over the course of the whole game, and we had some uncharacteristic odd-man rushes against us that we usually don’t do."

    4841410725K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20263.5x their median

    At least for now, this 32 Thoughts interview with Quinn should calm some #mnwild fan nerves https://t.co/zUw7f2lhm1

    2871635456K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20263.3x their median

    Max Shabanov makes it 2-0 and has one heckuva celly. Came after Michael McCarron got away with the same kinda pick on Josh Norris that they just called Peyton Krebs on Joel Eriksson Ek. The fans are livid.

    283824118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20263.2x their median

    Wild training camp roster. A list of the open practices and how to get free tickets is at this link https://t.co/BIo8G1wtAi https://t.co/67FxtDEi42

    281179153K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20263.1x their median

    kirill pregame interview!! 🥹 https://t.co/4t8nwpsqVX

    262264719K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20262.5x their median

    Danila Yurov one-timer, 1-0. His first goal of the season. Hynes started the second unit after the first unit drew the penalty

    216620114K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20262.4x their median

    2-0 #mnwild after 2. Danila Yurov and Max Shabanov score 1:45 apart. I'm going to go out on a limb and declare that's the fastest two goals in NHL history by Chelyabinsk, Russia, natives.

    22118325K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#mnwild#letsgobuffalo

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 97 interactions against 206K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 46% of 20,183 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 0.651% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 638 interactions, about 6.6x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mnwild, #letsgobuffalo.

What is Michael Russo's engagement rate on X?
Michael Russo (@RussoHockey) has an engagement rate of 0.047%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 206,382 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.047%, Michael Russo sits above the 25th percentile of the 203,096 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RussoHockey have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 46% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,183 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RussoHockey post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going