Back to @RupertLowe10's profile

Rupert Lowe MP engagement report

@RupertLowe10 - 903K followers on X

Measured over 77 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
2.27%
of 903K followers
Per impression
8.91%
228K views on a typical post
Reach
25.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
20K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.068%
155 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.3/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 20K interactions against 903K followers, an engagement rate of 2.27%. Measured over 77 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 228K times each, and 8.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 25.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 77 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 117K interactions, about 5.8x its own typical post.

Measured over 77 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #standuptoracism.

Compared with accounts its own size

Rupert Lowe MP's engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 2.27%, Rupert Lowe MP sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video23% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 23% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 478 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 20265.8x their median

    I will make the country a promise tonight. Any high-ranking public servant facilitating and deliberately enabling the invasion of Britain will be prosecuted by a Restore Britain Government. They will go to prison. Hundreds, if not thousands - this is their warning. This has now gone too far. We have the entire establishment weaponising the British state to import these men. In the thousands and thousands. Something has to be done, because this just cannot continue. So back us. Give the threat weight. Put the fear of God into them. Make them think twice. Force them to change course. Provide Restore Britain the electoral support to make the threat count. And when we win, they will go to prison. Your vote, your backing, your support. It matters, and it can make a difference now. Not in 2029. But now. Because this can't go on. It just can't. Use Restore Britain as your voice, your weapon, your threat. We will not let you down. That is my promise to the British people.

    96K17K2.7K9171.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20264.8x their median

    Portugal's burqa ban has been enacted today. Good news. Britain should do the same.

    89K7.8K7291961.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263.9x their median

    What are we doing to ourselves? https://t.co/gpwIQGih5Y

    70K6.6K2.3K5171.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.8x their median

    Muslims are attempting to cancel John Cleese because they do not like his entirely fair and reasonable criticism of Islam. I urge all Restore Britain members to support John.

    68K7.8K908112526K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20262.7x their median

    The British people have had enough. Every single migrant invading Portsmouth tonight must be SENT HOME. We do not want these third world chancers, conmen and scumbags housed in our communities. Deport them all. Every last one.

    47K6.3K55184429K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.7x their median

    An app designed for reporting 'islamophobia' is now campaigning for me to be banned from Parliament. We are reaching ever increasing heights of delusion, fear and nuttiness.

    47K5.7K921102374K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.6x their median

    I am becoming increasingly pissed off that third world conmen invading our country are being placed ahead of law-abiding British men and women. Restore Britain stands with the patriots making their voices heard, in Portsmouth and elsewhere. https://t.co/LBcl8KuC28

    44K8.1K1.1K210447K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.6x their median

    Banning cousin marriage is the right thing to do.

    49K2.9K9111701.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.4x their median

    A high-ranking official in the Home Office is today ordering where to send those invaders that arrived in Portsmouth last night. Which is the next Piddington, or Epping, or Crowborough, or Thetford? I want that man or woman to know that if they give the order to place hundreds of unvetted young men into a British community, then a Restore Britain Government will aim to prosecute them. This is retrospective. If we win power, and we're already the fourth largest political party through membership, that official will be dragged through the courts. With prison the ultimate aim. Currently, we are fourth favourite with the bookmakers to win the most seats - well ahead of the Lib Dems and the Greens. For a six month old party, that is impressive. But we need more. Lend us your support and give this threat real teeth. That official needs to know that there will be consequences for their actions. Not in 2029, but now. Today. 2026. That is what Restore Britain is promising the British people. Consequences.

    40K7.1K709191562K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.3x their median

    Our Restore Britain investigation has uncovered that the British taxpayer is funding condoms and lubricant for illegal migrants detained in immigration removal centres. This is not a joke. A Restore Britain Government will end the piss-take.

    39K7.0K980352862K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#standuptoracism

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 20K interactions against 903K followers, an engagement rate of 2.27%. Measured over 77 original posts, its engagement rate beats 99% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 228K times each, and 8.91% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 25.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 77 posts sampled, 23% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 117K interactions, about 5.8x its own typical post.

What is Rupert Lowe MP's engagement rate on X?
Rupert Lowe MP (@RupertLowe10) has an engagement rate of 2.27%, based on the median interactions across 77 original posts from the last 30 days against 903,469 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 2.27%, Rupert Lowe MP sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RupertLowe10 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 99% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RupertLowe10 post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going