Back to @RoxanneRoselle's profile

๐“ก๐“ธ๐”๐“ช๐“ท๐“ท๐“ฎ ๐ŸŒน engagement report

@RoxanneRoselle - 656K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.014%
of 656K followers
Per impression
0.327%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
4.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
90
interactions (median)
Saved
0.016%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 90 interactions against 656K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.327% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 51x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

๐“ก๐“ธ๐”๐“ช๐“ท๐“ท๐“ฎ ๐ŸŒน's engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 23% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.014%, ๐“ก๐“ธ๐”๐“ช๐“ท๐“ท๐“ฎ ๐ŸŒน sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 78 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 202651x their median

    bouncy :) https://t.co/zYELSJ86Qi

    4.4K23538657K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202647x their median

    A day in the life of an adult film actress who showed up to the shoot to get laidโ€ฆ and get paid. ๐Ÿ˜ญ๐Ÿ’ธ https://t.co/mUydc6MWLH

    4.0K154263390K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202431x their median

    On this day one year ago, Britney Spears performed the knives dance. https://t.co/hyUZKccwcB

    2.2K194722344.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202627x their median

    what it do baby boo ๐Ÿ˜‡ https://t.co/WT96X8YaMk

    2.3K12236064K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202622x their median

    theyโ€™re fun to play with ๐Ÿ˜ https://t.co/DKXXEhUVsd https://t.co/wvRw4EXhVn

    1.9K8216138K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202621x their median

    lazy sunday? message me ๐Ÿ’™ https://t.co/jEEFfZ59Q3 https://t.co/SvsrOSChGP

    1.8K7510047K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202620x their median

    need you https://t.co/QFesGMSzlM

    1.7K7221037K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202619x their median

    sick of me yet? https://t.co/K1VekHVHZC

    1.7K7024340K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202611x their median

    it's the facial expressions for me ๐Ÿ˜† @4skinforeigner @GothGFsX https://t.co/oCsoOFAwfT

    948397046K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 20262.6x their median

    If youโ€™ve worked with creators and donโ€™t even follow them back, thatโ€™s a red flag. Itโ€™s a small gesture, but it says a lot about how you view the people helping build your brand. And if following me back is beneath you, donโ€™t come back to my DMs asking for another collaboration. โœŒ๏ธ

    273331610309K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 90 interactions against 656K followers, an engagement rate of 0.014%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 38% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 0.327% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.6K interactions, about 51x its own typical post.

What is ๐“ก๐“ธ๐”๐“ช๐“ท๐“ท๐“ฎ ๐ŸŒน's engagement rate on X?
๐“ก๐“ธ๐”๐“ช๐“ท๐“ท๐“ฎ ๐ŸŒน (@RoxanneRoselle) has an engagement rate of 0.014%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 655,700 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.014%, ๐“ก๐“ธ๐”๐“ช๐“ท๐“ท๐“ฎ ๐ŸŒน sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RoxanneRoselle have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 38% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RoxanneRoselle post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going