Back to @Rosiexrider's profile

rose engagement report

@Rosiexrider - 489K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.022%
of 489K followers
Per impression
0.507%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
4.30%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
106
interactions (median)
Saved
0.014%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 106 interactions against 489K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.507% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 159x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

rose's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 31% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.022%, rose sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.68%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,881 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.68%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video25% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 25% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 84 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 20, 2026159x their median

    the pink, the bombshell hair, the corset… she was born to be a victoria’s secret angel https://t.co/RV20AzSUDY

    16K1.2K746134K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 202647x their median

    https://t.co/iFCFteo64c

    4.0K961185855K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202627x their median

    hey (say it back) https://t.co/T7Arz0hWZG

    2.8K6926049K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202618x their median

    bang https://t.co/Q3nHX7Pi7g

    1.8K5317144K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202616x their median

    good morning (‘:: https://t.co/kzes25RPVB

    1.7K3414030K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202616x their median

    fit check https://t.co/Phzcpwb4DH

    1.6K4417153K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202612x their median

    Live on kick come hang :3 https://t.co/6fokdn80vy https://t.co/gF9lzqg2Zn

    1.2K191035K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 202610.0x their median

    rate the fit https://t.co/V8ZOgTyUTJ

    1.0K2213020K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20269.2x their median

    streaming on kick today, tomorrow, Saturday & Sunday at 7pm! Info below (: https://t.co/PoeJGKpqB0

    953163020K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20266.4x their median

    I genuinely think there will be a class action lawsuit against YouTube for all of these channel bans. So many people have lost their income and years of hard work literally overnight and YouTube refuses to even entertain the idea that their ai system is wrong…

    56451531174K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 106 interactions against 489K followers, an engagement rate of 0.022%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 0.507% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.30% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 25% carry an image or video, 19% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 17K interactions, about 159x its own typical post.

What is rose's engagement rate on X?
rose (@Rosiexrider) has an engagement rate of 0.022%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 488,545 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.022%, rose sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,881 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Rosiexrider have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Rosiexrider post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going