Ronoh K Clinton engagement report
@RonohClinton - 92K followers on X
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 2.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 708x its own typical post.
Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Ronoh K Clinton's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.042%, Ronoh K Clinton sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.128% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 37% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 37% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 70 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Mar 16, 2021708x their median
🔝 Toni Kroos OR Luka Modrić? #UCL https://t.co/qSYgKfBNSH
- Aug 20, 2026487x their median
🚨🟡🔵 Leeds United have rejected a loan approach from Polish side Radomiak Radom for Alfie Cresswell. Loan proposal rejected by #lufc while Cresswell remains a player attracting interest. 🇵🇱 https://t.co/y3iBUAZ9xD
- Aug 31, 2026349x their median
🚨😅 | OFFICIAL: Como 1907 have been granted permission to host Champions League games at their lake-side home stadium. That means Manchester United will now play against them there in October. [@NathSalt1] https://t.co/gJSjRuHmYU
- Aug 31, 2026267x their median
Come on Villa Park 😤🏠 https://t.co/I9zZ1Xhwhd
- Sep 18, 202680x their median
Losing 3–0 on a Friday after work, with the whole weekend ahead of you. Imagine how ruined the weekend is for Chelsea fans. 😭😀😆😆
- Jan 6, 202146x their median
The best ever goal in Manchester derby! #MUFC #MUNMCI https://t.co/cycvtus0KH
- Sep 6, 20263.7x their median
Amad saved Mbeumo’s ass a lot last season. His overlapping runs from the wing often covered up Mbeumo’s poor performances. Now Mbeumo has to cover the whole flank with Dalot, and the two of them look terrible together.
- Sep 16, 20263.6x their median
Who pays Manchester United players because these guys are rubbish employees.
- Aug 18, 20263.5x their median
Eras comes to an end. https://t.co/FR1kfROdcE
- Jul 22, 20263.5x their median
Vibes 🥰 https://t.co/CGWAafSvzn
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 39 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 2.80% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 37% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 708x its own typical post.
- What is Ronoh K Clinton's engagement rate on X?
- Ronoh K Clinton (@RonohClinton) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 92,279 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.042%, Ronoh K Clinton sits above the 25th percentile of the 156,969 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RonohClinton have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RonohClinton post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.83 posts per day across the measured window.