Back to @Roman_Baber's profile

Roman Baber engagement report

@Roman_Baber - 168K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.484%
of 168K followers
Per impression
7.85%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
6.17%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
815
interactions (median)
Saved
0.077%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 815 interactions against 168K followers, an engagement rate of 0.484%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 7.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 22, 2026. Recurring tag: #rcmp.

Compared with accounts its own size

Roman Baber's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.484%, Roman Baber sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video93% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 203 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 202611x their median

    What fresh hell is this!? The European Union is falling apart. Full of waste, over regulation & terrible immigration policy, where censorship thrives. We are Canadian, we are not European. @MarkJCarney did not campaign on joining the EU and he did not consult Parliament! https://t.co/Uy82Xm6XGq

    6.0K1.9K767145122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20268.7x their median

    "Tech Platforms want to spread disinformation." @MarkJCarney is a dangerous man. He is about to perpetrate the greatest assault on free speech of the 21st century. Him and his EU buddies. ⬇️ https://t.co/Z0UOV0aU9U

    4.8K1.6K59511287K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20267.2x their median

    We are Canadian! 🇨🇦 We're not going to let @MarkJCarney to subject ourselves to Ursula Von Der Leyen or any technocrat from Brussels! ⬇️ https://t.co/Kt1nxxEx9u

    4.3K1.1K4196870K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20266.1x their median

    The EU is unable to control its borders. The result is chaos, poverty & crime. We already have options for foreign students, both ways, but this is frightening & wrong. Don’t open Canadian borders to the European Union! https://t.co/bWHI6IedbO

    3.6K94539766229K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20206.0x their median

    Sept 5 is very special to me. Today is my 25th anniversary of coming to Canada. Here is a short clip describing my Canadian immigration experience. On Sept 5, 1995, in the middle of the night, in the heart of York Centre..and I was in love from day one. #onpoli #cdnpoli #TOpoli https://t.co/YeTTI5c9yG

    3.5K53976290View on X
  • Oct 5, 20265.4x their median

    Under the Liberals Canada turned into a hub for money laundering & terrorist financing. Today at Justice Committee I confronted the Public Safety Minister about that. "Why have you failed to put an end to the financing of Hizballah through the port of Montréal?" ⬇️ https://t.co/o1ihKxw0NX

    3.1K1.1K1672540K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20265.2x their median

    It's incredible how brazenly @MarkJCarney lies to Canadians and how outlets like @CTVNews let him get away with it. https://t.co/V7h6E0wZRj

    3.1K8282792727K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 20263.7x their median

    How dare you question Carney's attempt to join the EU without consulting Parliament? @MarkJCarney already told you MPs "are useful for votes". Now let them have Eurovision! https://t.co/AYESjjPLmh

    2.3K6151372042K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20262.9x their median

    We already have Free Trade with European Union, that's great! But Canadians don't want: - another level of gov't - another regulatory regime - stringent censorship laws - open borders - fees & levies @MarkJCarney didn't campaign on this. We are Canadians, not Europeans! 🇨🇦 https://t.co/x6g6Ms9b2u

    1.5K5472073117K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20262.7x their median

    Seriously, @MarkJCarney is a massive failure on Foreign Affairs! - wrong on security re China - wrong on the EU trajectory - wrong on recognition of Palestine - wrong on being "at war" w/USA Too bad our "PRAVDA" media hypes him for paycheques. https://t.co/pLfJTN9Dzz

    1.6K509105109.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#rcmp

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 815 interactions against 168K followers, an engagement rate of 0.484%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 7.85% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.8K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is Roman Baber's engagement rate on X?
Roman Baber (@Roman_Baber) has an engagement rate of 0.484%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 168,367 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.484%, Roman Baber sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Roman_Baber have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Roman_Baber post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going