Back to @Romain_Molina's profile

Romain Molina engagement report

@Romain_Molina - 708K followers on X

Measured over 84 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.198%
of 708K followers
Per impression
1.43%
98K views on a typical post
Reach
13.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
47 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.93/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 708K followers, an engagement rate of 0.198%. Measured over 84 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 1.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 84 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 132K interactions, about 94x its own typical post.

Measured over 84 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 2, 2026. Recurring tag: #fcnantes.

Compared with accounts its own size

Romain Molina's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.198%, Romain Molina sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video12% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 12% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 368 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 30, 202694x their median

    Back in 2014, there was a man who was already aware of the irregularities involving Manchester City. That man now runs FIFA. The infamous Gianni Infantino, then UEFA General Secretary, abused his authority, shared confidential documents and, in short, outmanoeuvred the Investigatory Chamber, doing everything in his power to ensure that both Manchester City and PSG would merely receive a fine, avoiding a deeper investigation that could have led to a Champions League ban. All of these details were also revealed through Football Leaks. Given his actions as UEFA General Secretary and, more recently, as FIFA President, I can only say, in my humble opinion, that Gianni Infantino has become a cancer on football and should have no place in the future of the game.

    105K23K1.5K2.1K5.8M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202629x their median

    Malick Fofana passe actuellement une visite médicale à Lyon mais il ne sait pas pour quel club

    37K2.6K2428101.9M viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 202627x their median

    On peut difficilement faire pire sortie en équipe nationale que celle de Cristiano Ronaldo après une telle carrière

    35K2.7K2351731.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202618x their median

    C'est honteux que les gens en Guadeloupe, Martinique, Saint-Martin et Saint-Barthélémy ne peuvent pas avoir accès à la Liga avec DAZN France car les territoires d'outre-mer ont été exclus des zones de retransmission

    21K3.6K16797461K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202616x their median

    Il n'y a aucun pays au monde qui a rénové deux stades pour 250 millions de dollars hormis la Guinée 🇬🇳 S'il n'y a pas eu des détournements massifs, je veux bien manger un rat

    21K1.4K146211737K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202614x their median

    Curieux de voir combien Raphinha peut marquer de buts sur une saison entière si son corps le laisse en paix...

    19K9455629331K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202614x their median

    Guler va-t-il toujours être le premier joueur offensif du Real à sortir pour ne pas bousculer les statuts du trio de devant ?

    18K86813590395K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202613x their median

    Je publie dans une heure une vidéo complète sur l'affaire Manchester City

    17K1.2K144152488K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202610.0x their median

    Au lieu de parler de l'âge ou la calvitie de Malick Yalcouyé, mieux vaut évoquer son habileté balle au pied et sa progression constante depuis son arrivée en Europe (en Suède avec des passages en Autriche et à Swansea) Un des nouveaux visages à suivre pour la Côte d'Ivoire 🇨🇮 en sélection aussi

    12K1.4K6237308K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20269.2x their median

    Je ne sais pas s'il faut rire ou pleurer des analyses alarmistes sur le début de saison du PSG (même s'il y a bien sûr des soucis à souligner) On avait entendu pareil en janvier/février et au final, les Parisiens ont tout gagné, donc... Pour rappel, c'est long une saison, très long !

    12K1.0K9449468K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#fcnantes

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 708K followers, an engagement rate of 0.198%. Measured over 84 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 1.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 84 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 132K interactions, about 94x its own typical post.

What is Romain Molina's engagement rate on X?
Romain Molina (@Romain_Molina) has an engagement rate of 0.198%, based on the median interactions across 84 original posts from the last 30 days against 708,092 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.198%, Romain Molina sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Romain_Molina have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Romain_Molina post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going