Roger Stone engagement report
@RogerJStoneJr - 929K followers on X
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 984 interactions against 929K followers, an engagement rate of 0.106%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 4.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 180K interactions, about 183x its own typical post.
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 20, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Roger Stone's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 88% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.106%, Roger Stone sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 56% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 44% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 44% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 276 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 20, 2026183x their median
Earlier this year, my husband Abraham was diagnosed with a very rare bone cancer. This has been a challenging time for us and is hard to talk about. But so many of you have reached out asking how he’s doing, and sharing your prayers and well wishes with us. We made this video to share a little about what this journey has been like, and to update you on his recovery. Mahalo for all of the love and support 🙏🏽
- Dec 3, 2018208x their median
“I will never testify against Trump.” This statement was recently made by Roger Stone, essentially stating that he will not be forced by a rogue and out of control prosecutor to make up lies and stories about “President Trump.” Nice to know that some people still have “guts!”
- Sep 5, 202688x their median
https://t.co/yi4Hsr9fTK
- Sep 18, 202673x their median
This is a very bad decision, President @realDonaldTrump - it’s not the media’s job to give you endless praise. It’s their job to hold you and your administration to rigorous account. Banning them is a suppression of free speech and unconstitutional. https://t.co/XSBlwMoyNt
- Aug 25, 202637x their median
I asked Richard Nixon who killed JFK and "he said "well Lyndon and I both wanted to be president, but I wasn't willing to kill for it" https://t.co/nmGazLsw2W
- Aug 18, 202628x their median
So just to be clear, Congressman Eric Swalwell, who for two years falsely accused me of being a Russian intelligence asset was penetrating a Chinese communist spy who penetrated his office at the same time he was illegally leaking classified information to the media
- Oct 17, 202626x their median
Happy Birthday to my beautiful courageous and indefatigable wife who beat cancer through sheer will, determination and Faith. https://t.co/MzgiGs8IMc
- Jul 5, 202646x their median
🚨🩸 There’s a direct line between the murder of JFK, the removal of Nixon (too soon to kill him — so they took him down in a silent coup), the attempt to assassinate Reagan, and the attempt to impeach, remove, and kill Trump. These are the same institutions — the same interests https://t.co/70X39KMUap
- Feb 17, 202630x their median
MY BEEF WITH STEVE BANNON My problem with Steve began when he testified under oath to the House Intelligence Committee, as I did, and correctly said he and I had never discussed WikiLeaks, Julian Assange, or the emails Democrats were claiming had been stolen. But then, to the surprise of the MAGA movement, Steve popped up as a MUELLER WITNESS at my trial and said the direct opposite—essentially perjuring himself and siding with the Mueller witch hunt in a trial against me that was meant to take down President Trump. George Washington University Law School professor Jonathan Turley noted the inconsistencies and told The New York Post, “He [Bannon] has two diametrically opposite sworn statements.” I first noted a story in the New York Post reporting that Steve Bannon had been seen entering Epstein's palatial home in Manhattan in 2018. The NY Post would go on to also report that Bannon visited Epstein at his Paris apartment. Who cozies up to a man then-convicted of sex crimes in Florida involving children? I said so on Infowars at the time. Communications between Steve Bannon and Jeffrey Epstein, recently declassified by the DOJ, show Bannon denigrating Trump, calling him "stupid," calling for his removal as President under the "25th Amendment," and bragging about Bannon's undermining of Trump's China trade policy. Bannon pleaded guilty to DEFRAUDING donors of the We Build the Wall nonprofit of $15 million. It had nothing to do with Trump. His two co-conspirators served long prison sentences. Bannon, on the other hand, was given no jail time. Bannon would then be named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the $1 billion fraud trial of his shady Chinese patron, who is convicted of various financial crimes—but Steve is not prosecuted. Now there seem to be legitimate questions and a lawsuit pertaining to Bannon's management of a Bitcoin company. Any reasonable reading of the texts and emails released by the DOJ shows the intimacy between Bannon and Epstein—with Bannon saying in an email to Epstein that he, "not DJT," was the center of the movement. Bannon began attacking @elonmusk when Musk began calling for full disclosure regarding Jeffrey Epstein. Bannon claimed that Elon was not a legitimate U.S. citizen and demanded that Musk lose all federal government contracts such as SpaceX and Starlink. Elon said Bannon would be in the Epstein files and that Bannon will yet go to prison—I believe Elon will yet be proven completely right about Steve Bannon. Bannon went to prison because he decided to completely ignore a subpoena from a House investigatory committee. He could have simply fulfilled his legal obligation by showing up for the hearing and asserting his Fifth Amendment rights, which both General Flynn and I did; not because I have anything to hide, not because of anything I know, but because I have extensive experience with Democrats turning honest testimony into a process crime. For some reason, Bannon decided to be a martyr, or he just had bad lawyering. Now we are told the DOJ is essentially moving to vacate the charges Bannon was convicted of for defying the House subpoena; then I ask: When will Peter Navarro, whose brutal arrest on the same charge is unforgivable, also have the charges he was convicted of vacated? It is widely believed that Bannon was paying and continues to pay a small army of influencers—many of whom seem to be SILENT regarding these shocking disclosures. I believe much of the 13 hours of video, which has not been released by the DOJ, includes Bannon further coaching Epstein on how to parry tough questions about the allegations against him. All 13 hours should be release now unedited. The claim that it was all for a "documentary" won't wash because Bannon is in the Epstein emails COACHING Epstein about HOW TO ACT, saying, "First we need to push back on the lies; then crush the pedo/trafficking narrative; then rebuild your image as philanthropist." If it was a documentary—it was a documentary to redeem Epstein. Was Steve getting paid, or was the payoff yet to come? Indeed, Bannon was scheduled to visit the man he called "God" and "brother" in the emails only two days after Epstein was arrested while landing in his private jet from Paris at Teterboro Airport in New Jersey. My name appears in the Epstein files because in an email Epstein complains to Bannon about an interview I did on Infowars in which I connected Epstein to the Clintons. I'm damn proud of that. That is my beef with Steve Bannon. MAGA, Roger Stone
- Sep 19, 202612x their median
Jake Tapper now fully admits was aware of Joe Biden's infirmities and mental and physical decline yet he hid them and attacked those who asked reasonable questions -now he wants to be treated like a journalist. F*ck Jake Tapper.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 984 interactions against 929K followers, an engagement rate of 0.106%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 4.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.28% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 180K interactions, about 183x its own typical post.
- What is Roger Stone's engagement rate on X?
- Roger Stone (@RogerJStoneJr) has an engagement rate of 0.106%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 928,940 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.106%, Roger Stone sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RogerJStoneJr have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RogerJStoneJr post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.47 posts per day across the measured window.