Back to @Roberto_Moar's profile

Roberto Moar engagement report

@Roberto_Moar - 191K followers on X

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.004%
of 191K followers
Per impression
0.119%
7.2K views on a typical post
Reach
3.75%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 2 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 191K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 7.2K times each, and 0.119% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 443 interactions, about 55x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 2 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tag: #sport890.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Roberto Moar sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link50% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 50% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 140 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 27, 202655x their median

    Pasaron muchas horas y se pueden tirar algunas líneas del peor fracaso de las últimas décadas. Fracaso del que no escapan el técnico -por supuesto-, incapaz de entender la idiosincrasia del uruguayo, de reflejar su idea más allá del espejismo de los primeros meses, de ser inteligente para zurcir desastres internos, de vivir más tiempo en el país, de respetar lo construido sin demolerlo. Los futbolistas, al fin y al cabo, intérpretes fallidos de una propuesta que no nos permitió clasificar en un grupo que cualquier uruguayo volvería a elegir. Los errores nos condenaron al peor papelón de los últimos mundiales superando al de Qatar 2022. Lamento lo vivido por Muslera. Me puse en primera fila para pedirlo. Sus errores fueron enormes. Los dirigentes que, prisioneros de un contrato impropio para la realidad del fútbol uruguayo, se ataron a la esperanza de que todo cambiara mágicamente y la luz divina zurciera discrepancias que iban desde lo táctico a lo vivencial. Además, permitieron que demasiados futbolistas lesionados integraran el plantel. Así como acertaron en muchos cambios beneficiosos y revolucionarios para el fútbol uruguayo, no tomaron la decisión de cortar un ciclo que agonizaba… aún entendiendo el alto costo económico que implicaba el cese. Dos mundiales seguidos eliminados en primera ronda. Espero que la determinación nos lleve a elegir -como corresponde- un DT uruguayo para el próximo proceso. No importa en qué momento. Tiene que representar nuestro estilo de vivir y sentir el fútbol. Y sobran candidatos: Almada, Broli, Pezzolano y pueden ustedes agregar nombres. Capaces y nuestros. Terminamos comprando el discurso de un DT que se emocionaba tomando el 104 -como contó en su primera conferencia- y nunca entendió que necesitábamos que se emocionara con las pequeñas cosas que nos ayudan a convivir cada día. Bielsa dijo que no dejó nada… discrepo… dejó enseñanzas que no debemos dejar pasar por alto. PD. Gracias Lolo por estar a la altura, Papo por tus goles y Cáceres por tu esfuerzo. Les seguiré contando el mundial en @Sport890 y @canal10uruguay Un mundial que se volverá eterno sin la Celeste en la cancha.

    188162241540K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 202637x their median

    Edinson Cavani se despidió de @BocaJrsOficial ¡Aguante Matador! https://t.co/rsXzexzMRt

    271108429K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202621x their median

    ✋🏻 𝐏𝐀𝐑𝐎 https://t.co/K2LIaEaWqW

    5327484193K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202613x their median

    🟡⚫️Germán Pezzellla está muy cerca de jugar en Peñarol, no está cerrado. Se ultiman detalles https://t.co/0lbKNJx4Jl

    9250381K viewsView on X
  • Jul 9, 202610x their median

    La reunión de Marcelo Broli con Nacho Alonso fue muy positiva. El DT expuso su proyecto para las selecciones nacionales. Se sintió valorado por la AUF. El presidente de la Asociación le detalló que está supeditado a las futuras elecciones pero seguramente no habrá cambios en el Gobierno (lo que no implica que se renueven algunos de los integrantes del nuevo Ejecutivo). Si bien no hubo charla sobre la propuesta económica, el acuerdo Broli-AUF está próximo. Lo contamos en @Sport890

    58516129K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20266.6x their median

    🩵🇺🇾💪 (¡Que todo cambie…!) https://t.co/QfHJUBYHZH

    436404.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.4x their median

    Uruguay se presentará el 6 de octubre, en el cierre de la Fecha FIFA, ante India en Calcuta. Previamente, el 3, el seleccionado local enfrentará a Brasil en el Vivekanada Yuba Bharati Krirangan (Estadio Salt Lake). AUF negocia -sin acuerdo aún- un partido en Yakarta ante Indonesia para luego de los choques amistosos ante Japón y Corea del Sur.

    202508.7K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20261.5x their median

    Cáceres habló de su vínculo con Bielsa. https://t.co/NTWdE0H6pA

    100203.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    “Lo de Torque da hasta envidia”: el elogio de Carreño y la respuesta de Marcelo Méndez. https://t.co/pvcnSY1YlG vía @futbolportaluy

    60405.5K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 2026

    Descargá la NUEVA app de Sport 890 y viví la emoción online. La Radio Deportiva del Uruguay va contigo, siempre. Desde Android https://t.co/0Y5TqSyBZU Desde IOS https://t.co/wRWGNmtuFS https://t.co/SRCpBfBVgU

    350211K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#sport890

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 191K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Posts are seen about 7.2K times each, and 0.119% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.75% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 2 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video and 50% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 443 interactions, about 55x its own typical post. Only 2 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Roberto Moar's engagement rate on X?
Roberto Moar (@Roberto_Moar) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 2 original posts from the last 30 days against 190,642 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Roberto Moar sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Roberto_Moar have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @Roberto_Moar post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going