Rob McNealy engagement report
@RobMcNealy - 322K followers on X
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 322K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 512 times each, and 0.489% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.159% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 18378x its own typical post.
Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tag: #drones.
Compared with accounts its own size
Rob McNealy's engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 26% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.001%, Rob McNealy sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 32% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 41% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 32% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 41% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 210 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 19, 202618378x their median
No lies detected. Pass it along. https://t.co/e95y1AIzNd
- Aug 4, 20266532x their median
Here it is: The Federal Department of Indoctrination: EXPOSED 🚨 Department of Indoctrination is laundering money back to the Democrats and their NGOs. Rep Harriet Hageman “The Federal Department of Education spends it as a budget of about $280 billion a year. Less than 25% goes to educating our students. So where does the other $220 billion go? It goes to a bureaucracy, it goes to a consultant, and that consultant then donates money BACK TO DEMOCRATS, and then it goes to a different consultant, and then it goes to an NGO. I mean, IT IS MONEY LAUNDERING and money churning at its absolute best.”
- Oct 7, 20266315x their median
This whole "blame the boomers" narrative is getting old. If the people you're complaining about are 46–61 years old, most of them aren't boomers. They're Gen X. And honestly, Gen X is exhausted from hearing the same complaints on repeat. We didn't get free college. Most of us never had guaranteed pensions. Housing wasn't magically cheap when adjusted for inflation, and plenty of us spent decades working, sacrificing, and starting from scratch. Every generation faces its own challenges. Ours did too. The difference is that we were taught that life isn't fair, nobody is coming to rescue you, and success usually comes from adapting, working, and pushing forward when things don't go your way. You don't have to like that message, but constantly looking for someone else to blame won't improve your situation. At some point, personal responsibility matters more than finding a new generation to be angry at.
- Aug 30, 20264451x their median
BREAKING: Randi Weingarten is doubling down on her Target boycott. She says Target "has remained silent" on ICE, so the company must be punished. "We said if Target remained SILENT, we would shop elsewhere." The crazy teachers unions must be dismantled. https://t.co/fSURtfe98H
- Aug 7, 20262522x their median
BREAKING: China’s Kimi K3 reportedly escaped its sandbox during cybersecurity testing & accessed the open internet without permission.
- Sep 25, 20261607x their median
Highly paid employees vs "cheaper": Back in 2007, Mr. Jozef, a 1st gen Polish immigrant, was relocating from NY to south and showed up for interview at my new 5axis shop.... in tweed suit & tie (leather briefcase too) He had titanium 5axis machining experience and as9100 quality systems. He said "i know I wont get salary I had in NY but hoping for a good offer". I offered him $1 *more* than his NY salary. He was stunned and teared up a little. He contributed greatly to many of the 5 year Boeing contracts we won. We grew from 8 people to 100, and from 850k to over $20 million. Jozef never scrapped one part in almost 10 years before he retired. Not one. But most importantly --> he trained many apprentices. Many went on to become awesome 5axis machinists and some programmers too. Hire the best. Pay so well you think it hurts. It will be worth it.
- Oct 3, 2026956x their median
A federal district judge just declared that Flock camera systems violate the Fourth Amendment! Applying Chatrie, the court concludes that extensive camera networks engage in unlawful "indiscriminate mass surveillance." A major ruling. https://t.co/GxUBzlAQA7 https://t.co/Kg5BPTWBkj
- Oct 4, 2026847x their median
If teachers could actually indoctrinate your kids, the kids would be able to do basic arithmetic and read at grade level. Instead, the kids complain every step of the way and wind up illiterate and relying on ChatGPT to tell them what 2+2 is. 🤦🏻♀️
- Aug 18, 2026815x their median
https://t.co/ySazVP1fFU
- Aug 13, 2026800x their median
Most of what young people blame on “capitalism” is actually the result of statism: big government; monetary debasement; regulation that blocks housing supply; taxes that punish work and investment; and political privilege that protects insiders. Young people are not victims of free markets. They are victims of a big government system in which political spending rules, central banks subsidize debt instead of promoting price stability, savings, and prudent investment, and bureaucrats decide who gets opportunities. More government will not solve any of it. https://t.co/FD5eABY8Yl
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 322K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 5% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 512 times each, and 0.489% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.159% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 32% carry an image or video and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 18378x its own typical post.
- What is Rob McNealy's engagement rate on X?
- Rob McNealy (@RobMcNealy) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 322,311 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.001%, Rob McNealy sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RobMcNealy have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 5% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RobMcNealy post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.