Rima Hassan engagement report
@RimaHas - 421K followers on X
Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 421K followers, an engagement rate of 0.258%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 60K times each, and 1.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 30x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gaza, #hindrajabfoundation, #israël.
Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #gaza, #hindrajabfoundation, #israël.
Compared with accounts its own size
Rima Hassan's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 64% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.258%, Rima Hassan sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.679%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 80% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 27% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 27% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 309 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 12, 202530x their median
La liberté guidant les peuples. https://t.co/PjSX4EsFEr
- May 21, 20255.3x their median
đ”đž Ă nos dirigeants europĂ©ens : vous ĂȘtes ce que vous faites, seuls vos actes comptent. #sanctionisrael #gazagenocide https://t.co/J14HYizPwr
- Feb 19, 202610x their median
Je me permets de compiler toutes les sources sur le gĂ©nocide pour notre premier ministre @SebLecornu : 13 octobre 2023. Al-Haq, Al Mezan Center for Human Rights, et PCHR se rĂ©fĂšrent aux dĂ©clarations des dirigeants israĂ©liens (Gallant, Katz, Ghassan Alian, etc) et avertissent sur des dĂ©clarations incitant au gĂ©nocide. 13 octobre 2023. Raz Segal, historien israĂ©lien spĂ©cialiste des gĂ©nocides, dĂ©crit ce qui se passe Ă Gaza comme un « cas dâĂ©cole de gĂ©nocide. 14 octobre 2023. Lemkin Institute for Genocide Prevention tire la sonnette d'alarme 15 octobre 2023. Env. 800 juristes, universitaires et spĂ©cialistes du droit international, de lâĂ©tude des conflits et du gĂ©nocide signent une dĂ©claration alertant sur le risque de gĂ©nocide Ă Gaza 2 novembre 2023. 7 rapporteurs spĂ©ciaux UN20 alertent : « Nous restons convaincus que le peuple palestinien court un grave risque de gĂ©nocide » 16 novembre 2023. Une trentaine dâexperts indĂ©pendants UN alertent, dans une nouvelle dĂ©claration conjointe sur « le gĂ©nocide en cours » Ă Gaza. 20 novembre 2023. La Commission internationale de juristes publie une note rappelant que « l'obligation de prĂ©venir un gĂ©nocide Ă Gaza, et le devoir d'agir qui en dĂ©coule 12 dĂ©cembre 2023. La FIDH reconnaĂźt quâIsraĂ«l mĂšne un gĂ©nocide. 26 janvier 2024. Mesures conservatoires Afrique du Sud v IsraĂ«l, Cour Internationale de Justice ; Ordonnance « risque plausible de gĂ©nocide ». 28 mars 2024. Ordonnance CIJ la Cour constatait un « risque accru » de gĂ©nocide et formulait des mesures supplĂ©mentaires et ordonne Ă IsraĂ«l de garantir lâaccĂšs humanitaire. 13 aoĂ»t 2024. Omer Bartov, historien de la Shoah et des gĂ©nocides Ă lâUniversitĂ© de Brown dĂ©clare Ă The Guardian que les actes dâIsraĂ«l Ă Gaza remplissent la dĂ©finition du gĂ©nocide et quâil nây a plus « aucun doute » sur lâintention gĂ©nocidaire. 20 septembre 2024. Le ComitĂ© spĂ©cial de lâONU sur les pratiques israĂ©liennes conclut quâelles constituent des actes de gĂ©nocide. 06 octobre 2024. Euro-Med publie le rapport De-Gaza: A Year of Israelâs Genocide and the Collapse of World Order. 29 octobre 2024. Amos Goldberg, historien israĂ©lien, rĂ©affirme ce quâil affirme depuis plusieurs mois : « IsraĂ«l commet un gĂ©nocide Ă Gaza ». 30 octobre 2024. LâONG Forensic Architecture publie âA Cartography of Genocideâ, un rapport de 827 pages concluant Ă un gĂ©nocide. 29 novembre 2024 - W. Schabas, spĂ©cialiste du gĂ©nocide, affirme dans Der Spiegel quâil existe « un solide argument » pour qualifier ce qui se passe Ă Gaza de gĂ©nocide. 4 dĂ©cembre 2024. Amnesty International conclut dans son rapport "On a l'impression d'ĂȘtre des sous-humains" quâIsraĂ«l commet un gĂ©nocide. 10 dĂ©cembre 2024. LâONG ECCHR conclut quâIsraĂ«l commet un gĂ©nocide. 18 dĂ©c. 2024. Dans son rapport âGaza: Life in a Death Trapâ, MSF affirme que ses observations directes concluent quâun nettoyage ethnique et un gĂ©nocide sont en cours Ă Gaza. 18 dĂ©c. 2024. rapport Human Rights Watch accuse IsraĂ«l de commettre un gĂ©nocide (et le crime contre lâhumanitĂ© dâextermination). 31 dĂ©cembre 2024. Dans son rapport Generation Wiped Out: Gazaâs Children in the Crosshairs of Genocide, PCHR parle de gĂ©nocide contre les enfants. 12 janvier 2025. Un rapport dâAl Mezan Center for Human Rights met en lumiĂšre lâimpact dĂ©vastateur des politiques gĂ©nocidaires dâIsraĂ«l sur les droits et la santĂ© reproductive des femmes palestiniennes. 23 janvier 2025. Al-Haq publie le rapport âThe Systematic Destruction of Gazaâs Healthcare System: A Pattern of Genocide. 24 fĂ©v. 2025. Lâhistorien spĂ©cialiste des gĂ©nocides, Raz Segal, publie dans the Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History: « lâassaut israĂ©lien sur Gaza est un cas dâĂ©cole de gĂ©nocide colonial, nourri par la suprĂ©matie juive et le soutien des US. 13 mars 2025. La Commission dâenquĂȘte indĂ©pendante des UN conclut dans le rapport « Plus quâun ĂȘtre humain ne peut supporter», que les attaques contre la santĂ© reproductive Ă Gaza constituent des actes gĂ©nocidaire.
- Aug 26, 202611x their median
đž photo dâun stade Ă Gaza de Jehad Alshrafi censurĂ©e Ă #Deauville sous pression des lobbys pro israĂ©liens. https://t.co/n6gRRPfB7w
- Sep 25, 202611x their median
đšHorrific footage shows the body of Palestinian prisoner Thaer Abu Asab being removed from his cell inside Israelâs Negev Desert torture center. He was brutally tortured by Israeli soldiers, leading to his death inside the cell.
- Sep 21, 20268.2x their median
Le 22 septembre 2026, marquera le premier anniversaire de la reconnaissance officielle de lâĂtat de Palestine par la France. Cette reconnaissance nâaura Ă©tĂ© quâun Ă©cran de fumĂ©e destinĂ© Ă masquer sa complicitĂ© avec IsraĂ«l et Ă dĂ©tourner lâattention de ses responsabilitĂ©s. Les mobilisations citoyennes doivent reprendre partout, pour un embargo sur les armes, pour la suspension des partenariats universitaires, pour le boycott institutionnel et culturel.
- Aug 26, 20265.9x their median
La France Insoumise est un parti de collabos qui pactise avec les ennemis de notre pays. https://t.co/w3NceRbAx3
- Sep 23, 20265.8x their median
đ”đž Salle comble ce soir Ă GenĂšve pour la confĂ©rence « MĂ©dias et Palestine ». https://t.co/hu4ynDDJhg
- Sep 24, 20265.2x their median
Ce soir à Paris, 30 artistes sont réunis pour la Palestine https://t.co/35VASTWIBb
- Aug 22, 20264.0x their median
#AMFIS2026 đą https://t.co/zkb6PI0atR
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 421K followers, an engagement rate of 0.258%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 60K times each, and 1.79% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 14.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 32K interactions, about 30x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #gaza, #hindrajabfoundation, #israël.
- What is Rima Hassan's engagement rate on X?
- Rima Hassan (@RimaHas) has an engagement rate of 0.258%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 421,039 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.258%, Rima Hassan sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RimaHas have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RimaHas post?
- Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.9 posts per day across the measured window.