Back to @RightWingWatch's profile

Right Wing Watch engagement report

@RightWingWatch - 348K followers on X

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.006%
of 348K followers
Per impression
0.247%
8.1K views on a typical post
Reach
2.32%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
20
interactions (median)
Saved
0.019%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 348K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 0.247% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video and 82% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 965 interactions, about 48x its own typical post.

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Right Wing Watch's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Right Wing Watch sits above the 10th percentile of the 198,354 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.14%
p750.665%
p902.52%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 198,354 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,930 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.14%
75th percentile0.665%
90th percentile2.52%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video35% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link82% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 35% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 82% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 167 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 5, 202648x their median

    Christian nationalist pastor Joel Webbon says he and his wife are having lots of kids in order to do their part "to try to make white people not go extinct" and brags that Hitler "would have loved [my wife's] complexion": "The Aryan force was strong with her." https://t.co/3kGrsAiPSe

    5871931226371K viewsView on X
  • Feb 2, 202345x their median

    White nationalists Vincent James and Lauren Witzke agree that Jews "are not the chosen people" and should therefore be prohibited from serving in government: "We shouldn't allow anyone that doesn't believe in Christ in positions of power in this country." https://t.co/fs0HKcpVw6

    42116522295107K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202641x their median

    Dear media, if you're going to write about the researchers who claim to have found Noah's Ark, you should probably mention that Lauren Witzke, the group's marketing and fundraising director, is a flat earth white nationalist conspiracy theorist. https://t.co/w5eQE59BGj https://t.co/2KspgqLnVr

    62914730516K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202639x their median

    After antisemitic white nationalist Jake Lang ranted that Muslims are "mongrel Third-Worlders" who are "multiplying like cockroaches," MAGA pastor Lorenzo Sewell called on church elders to lay hands on, pray over, and anoint Lang with oil: "I wanna pray for Jake, y'all. I love that. I love you, man."

    550989445204K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202339x their median

    Given the uncertain future of this platform, please consider following us elsewhere and signing up for our emails: https://t.co/f6Qj7aneId https://t.co/jsOO56ZlCS https://t.co/Xf4DBBz0a7 https://t.co/4koTYzbAA9 https://t.co/sOPyLzGKo4 https://t.co/txuJD5lgR8

    4821571275607K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202636x their median

    Probably not a good sign that when Rep. Riley Moore told a Heritage Foundation audience that "there's no one better" to lead the MAGA movement in 2028 than J.D. Vance, barely two people applauded. https://t.co/x4VmbS9uj2

    541130271529K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202633x their median

    MAGA cultist and self-proclaimed "prophet" Hank Kunneman calls on God to "shatter the agenda of hell" in the midterms: "We lift up a rod of authority like Moses and we're asking you to drown every enemy of the Lord God of Hosts. We're asking you to drown every demonic satanic perverted liberal compromise RINO agenda." https://t.co/ZFkbFxCuur

    28778184105223K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202622x their median

    White nationalist Jared Taylor celebrates that the Republican Party is embracing the fact that it is "the party of white people": "Look at a Trump rally. It might as well be a meeting of the Sons and Daughters of the Confederacy." https://t.co/VQhisuMqzP https://t.co/R9zn3QNR3O

    290122211419K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202620x their median

    MAGA cultist pastor and self-declared "prophet" Hank Kunneman held a church service in which he spoke in tongues while calling for God's "divine intervention" on behalf of the Republicans in the midterm elections. This went on for over twenty minutes. https://t.co/yua6fCGGzu https://t.co/azMdl5XaqV

    21765735164K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202620x their median

    Pathetic Trump sellout Glenn Beck grows emotional talking about the "silver coin from the time of the crucifixion" that he keeps on his desk at all times "to remind me: Don't sell out. Doesn't matter if you go broke, don't sell out." https://t.co/rU0gW2kcxs

    247399120318K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 20 interactions against 348K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 0.247% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video and 82% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 965 interactions, about 48x its own typical post.

What is Right Wing Watch's engagement rate on X?
Right Wing Watch (@RightWingWatch) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 60 original posts from the last 30 days against 348,238 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Right Wing Watch sits above the 10th percentile of the 198,354 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RightWingWatch have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RightWingWatch post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going