Richard Gage, AIA, Architect engagement report
@RichardGage_911 - 108K followers on X
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 292 interactions against 108K followers, an engagement rate of 0.269%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 5.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Richard Gage, AIA, Architect's engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 86% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.269%, Richard Gage, AIA, Architect sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 93% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 29% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 93% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 549 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 26, 202611x their median
[RG911Team] Why has no one explained this, 25 years after 9/11? As the Twin Towers burned and TV crews recorded the carnage, the ground started shaking. Then, moments later, the South Tower began to come down. This ABC news crew witnessed it. But what caused the quake? https://t.co/35LGEco5L9
- Oct 2, 202610x their median
[RG911Team] The paradigm has collapsed. It took years for serious questions about the official 9/11 story to become mainstream. But because we never stopped exposing the truth… it took less than 24 hours for the same thing to happen to the flyDubai hijack narrative. Everyone knows what a false flag attack is and the signs are becoming obvious. The media can’t sweep the anomalies, inconsistencies and lies under the rug anymore. We are watching… and when we see something, we say something. And as a result, the favorite psyop tool of tyrants has lost its power.
- Sep 11, 20267.1x their median
Never forget!! 🛩❌️ https://t.co/j5Evcx7YvJ
- Oct 10, 20265.8x their median
[RG911Team] Three different 9/11 survivors reported explosions occurred in the Twin Towers before the first airplane strike. Why don’t their testimonies appear in the 9/11 Commission report? https://t.co/KwVglWqOnB
- Oct 9, 20264.1x their median
Dr. Setty explains how, when scientists tried to get a model of Building 7 to collapse the way it did on September 11, they had to have every single structural column give way at the same time. It is impossible that fire could have caused that to happen. Full interview: https://t.co/3qDjhVhrfw
- Oct 5, 20263.6x their median
[RG911Team] They want us to forget. After the second plane hit the World Trade Center on 9/11, George W. Bush remained at Emma E. Booker Elementary School for 30 minutes instead of leaving to a secure location. He kept reading to children for 7 minutes, walked into an empty classroom to watch news coverage, gave a statement to the press, and then decided to leave. Why were he and his staff so confident that they were not a target of the alleged terror attack? The school event was known to the public days in advance.
- Oct 9, 20263.3x their median
[RG911Team] To say that @SammyObeid is based is an understatement. Few comedians are willing to expose taboo subjects like 9/11 and 10/7 to this degree. https://t.co/PZUL7uOmqj
- Sep 21, 20263.1x their median
[RG911Team] How to expose 9/11 “skeptics” and “debunkers”, Part 4 One common 9/11 argument: SKEPTIC: “That bright metallic liquid flowing out of the South Tower before its collapse is molten aluminum from the airplane, not molten iron from thermite.” TRUTH: NIST - and other “debunkers” - often bet that their audience won’t do basic research and see that this claim is total nonsense. Molten aluminum is a SILVER color in daylight conditions. Molten iron is a YELLOW color in daylight conditions. But don’t take our word for it - look it up, or ask aluminum smelting expert Gary Warner. No other possible explanation for this molten metal has been given by official sources. But one thing is certain: there were many credible reports of molten iron and molten steel found at ground zero after the towers fell. Its presence is irrefutable and unexplained by the official story. “Debunkers” who deny molten iron was found after 9/11 are either ignorant or intentionally deceiving the public.
- Sep 23, 20261.7x their median
[RG911Team] After 9/11, America’s top fire engineering researchers were ready to investigate: Why did the Twin Towers and WTC7 collapse so rapidly? But the evidence from Ground Zero was swept away, despite their pleas. Why did govt officials block a proper investigation? https://t.co/k2daYwXzTA
- Oct 7, 20261.6x their median
[RG911Team] How do we know that the Israeli government intentionally killed its own citizens on 10/7? On that tragic day, IDF tanks shelled the homes of Israelis, knowing they were still inside. And three years later, no one has been held accountable. If the goal was to rescue hostages (instead of killing them), tanks would have never been used. Even the “Hannibal Directive” argument doesn’t hold up here, because Hamas was surrounded by the IDF at this village and could not have dragged the Israeli hostages back into Gaza. This is 9/11 all over again, except in this case the false flag murders are out in the open.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 292 interactions against 108K followers, an engagement rate of 0.269%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 69% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.8K times each, and 5.01% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 93% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.3K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.
- What is Richard Gage, AIA, Architect's engagement rate on X?
- Richard Gage, AIA, Architect (@RichardGage_911) has an engagement rate of 0.269%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 108,214 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.269%, Richard Gage, AIA, Architect sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RichardGage_911 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 69% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RichardGage_911 post?
- Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.