Back to @ReutersLegal's profile

Reuters Legal engagement report

@ReutersLegal - 110K followers on X

Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 110K followers
Per impression
0.139%
718 views on a typical post
Reach
0.66%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 110K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 718 times each, and 0.139% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.655% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 108 interactions, about 108x its own typical post.

Measured over 59 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Reuters Legal's engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Reuters Legal sits below the 10th percentile of the 200,465 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.67%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,465 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,898 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.67%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video8% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 8% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 198 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 9, 2026108x their median

    JUST IN: US judge rules Justice Department use of state voter rolls is unlawful https://t.co/8O4DhJfDfR https://t.co/D2yYRWpysJ

    583414217K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 202615x their median

    If carried out as planned, death penalty experts said it would mark the first known broadcast or livestream of a lawful execution. https://t.co/lCB7GjEDRd

    64141.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202614x their median

    The Trump administration has long been hostile to the court and has previously imposed sanctions on its prosecutors and judges. https://t.co/nuBk3eZbSJ

    44512.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202612x their median

    Trump takes suit against Hillary Clinton over 2016 election to Supreme Court https://t.co/av06TJCMqh

    25141.5K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20269.0x their median

    Two more large US law firms, Holland & Knight and Squire Patton Boggs, have disclosed data security breaches to state regulators, and a third was hit with a new proposed class action in federal court over a reported hack. https://t.co/NuMSXUlXA1

    5400751 viewsView on X
  • Oct 11, 20268.0x their median

    A Dutch court on Saturday dismissed demands by shareholders of health technology company Philips for an investigation into allegations of misleading disclosures and management failures linked to the company's recall of sleep apnea devices. https://t.co/5jiE30Rsns

    4400910 viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20266.0x their median

    Cornell University hired top former DOJ lawyer Sally Yates for an internal investigation of how it handled a student's allegations that she was gang-raped https://t.co/NwRH0lEuwb

    42001.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20265.0x their median

    Trump renews bid to fire Fed's Cook with fresh White House inquiry https://t.co/DsQsMoiIlu

    3110673 viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20265.0x their median

    A US judge ruled on Friday that the Justice Department’s push to obtain state voter rolls and check them against a federal immigration database in order to demand that states remove voters it deemed ineligible was unlawful. https://t.co/JGZq0ZmxB2

    2111726 viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20265.0x their median

    Fed's Cook lawyers say hearing will show no mortgage fraud case https://t.co/u6Ps8Tf3JA

    32001.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 110K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 59 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 718 times each, and 0.139% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.655% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 59 posts sampled, 8% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 108 interactions, about 108x its own typical post.

What is Reuters Legal's engagement rate on X?
Reuters Legal (@ReutersLegal) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 59 original posts from the last 30 days against 109,672 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Reuters Legal sits below the 10th percentile of the 200,465 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ReutersLegal have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ReutersLegal post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going