Back to @RepJasmine's profile

Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett engagement report

@RepJasmine - 276K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.372%
of 276K followers
Per impression
4.97%
21K views on a typical post
Reach
7.49%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.097%
20 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 276K followers, an engagement rate of 0.372%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 4.97% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.49% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 87% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.372%, Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 277 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 15, 202611x their median

    Todd Blanche has been the lead obstructionist in the Epstein cover-up. He isn't here to serve the people — he's here to serve Trump. The American people and the survivors deserve better. https://t.co/7tuP0tRu1j

    12K3.5K2.7K127165K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 20269.4x their median

    POV: Me preparing for my Netflix documentary about how Republicans thought drawing me out of my district would silence me...think again. https://t.co/IMBHSvQvy6

    13K2.1K1.6K2801.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 202612x their median

    Leon Black didn’t show up for his Oversight deposition today — defying another congressional subpoena. I don’t know who told these billionaires that the rules don’t apply to them, but let me help them out: Nobody is above the law. And let’s be clear, Jeffrey Epstein wasn’t some stranger to this man. Leon Black paid Epstein more than $180 MILLION. We’ve had enough with the games. Oversight Democrats are demanding he be held in contempt. The survivors deserve answers — and we won’t stop until we get them. FOLLOW. THE. MONEY.

    9.3K2.4K3794293K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20266.1x their median

    Today is Black Women's Equal Pay Day. And in 2026, Black women are STILL only making 65 cents on the dollar. Pay Black women. Period. https://t.co/pCg5qgWSag

    6.9K1.5K2.2K109169K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20269.9x their median

    Make it make sense. Donald Trump keeps trying to restrict mail-in voting — but just voted by mail for the SECOND time this year. Clearly, the “problem” isn’t election integrity. It’s who gets to vote.

    7.7K1.9K5324061K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20269.3x their median

    This Administration cannot stand when women of color refuse to back down.  Just weeks before the election, they’ve weaponized DHS to raid Rep. Ilhan Omar’s home. This is authoritarian behavior — plain and simple.  We will NOT be intimidated.

    4.8K8203.8K10891K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 20264.8x their median

    This administration keeps trying to play in our face. Let’s not get it twisted: Indigenous people were here first. They need to stop demonizing people of color to push their racist agenda. https://t.co/cql1jxO7Oo

    5.2K1.4K1.8K89225K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20268.2x their median

    $40 TRILLION. That’s our national debt. Republicans ran up the tab, handed billionaires another tax break, and now wanna lecture working families about “fiscal responsibility.” You can’t max out the card AND pretend you’re the accountant. Pick a struggle.

    5.8K1.5K9917177K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20266.7x their median

    Republicans have done nothing to bring down the cost of fuel, food, or pharmaceuticals. Right now, the only people Republicans seem to be prioritizing are Trump and his cronies. If they were truly working for the American people, they wouldn’t need to buy their loyalty. We deserve better. Period.

    4.5K1.3K1.0K7166K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20263.5x their median

    BREAKING: The Supreme Court rules states can count late-arriving mailed ballots, rejecting a challenge led by the Trump administration. https://t.co/7EBOTz1vTt

    4.8K1.1K2371601.9M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.0K interactions against 276K followers, an engagement rate of 0.372%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 21K times each, and 4.97% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.49% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett's engagement rate on X?
Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett (@RepJasmine) has an engagement rate of 0.372%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 275,557 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.372%, Congresswoman Jasmine Crockett sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RepJasmine have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RepJasmine post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going