Tom Renz engagement report
@RenzTom - 362K followers on X
Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 435 interactions against 362K followers, an engagement rate of 0.12%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 102x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cyclists, #mancardpulled, #masksareretardedandgay.
Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026. Recurring tags: #cyclists, #mancardpulled, #masksareretardedandgay.
Compared with accounts its own size
Tom Renz's engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.12%, Tom Renz sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 68% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 28% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 68% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 28% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 282 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 1, 2026102x their median
🚨 BREAKING: Chinese lawyer Victor Gao suggests China may now have all the unredacted Epstein files. He says now is the right time to fully expose Jeffrey Epstein's activities and everyone involved with him. https://t.co/th3CbJWqhF
- Feb 18, 202657x their median
🚨BREAKING: FBI Director Kash Patel reveals on Dan Bongino that a MAJOR DISCOVERY has been made regarding the FUNDERS of Antifa terrorists "Wait until you see what's coming in the next month or two on the FUNDING STREAMS related to this." LFG! 🔥 "You and I had launched a serious investigation. We said, 'these organizations don't operate alone, don't operate in silence. They operate with a heavy, heavy stream of funding.'" "And we started looking into it, and guess what, Dan, we FOUND them." I can't WAIT. Expose it all, @FBIDirectorKash! @dbongino
- Apr 10, 202337x their median
Here is where the National Cattlemen’s Association says no there is no #mRNA in our cows: https://t.co/gMKJJrZvNi. Below are clips (edited for time) from the testimony of the lobbyist from the Missouri Cattlemen’s Association before the #Missouri House. Hmmm - seems they aren’t coordinating lies very well. Also - as a reminder - Congress removed country of origin labeling requirements from food so if we don’t have disclosure laws (like #HB1169 in Missouri) on sellers then who knows what’s in our food. We DO know that mRNA is transmissible through milk when ingested based on this study (https://t.co/1EoOB37U8F). #WeThePeople are not stupid & have been lied to more than enough. Transmissible #GeneTherapy vaccines are real & we DESERVE to know what is going into our body & to have an opportunity for #InformedConsent. Perhaps the Cattlemen should get their stories straight next time or ask their sponsors at #BigPharma for better instructions. Looking for Federal Sponsors of HB1169. #DiedSuddenly #Fauci #Truth @elonmusk @VigilantFox @TheChiefNerd @KanekoaTheGreat @KimDotcom @joerogan @dbongino @TuckerCarlson @NeputeWellness @BusyDrT @DougBillings @GOP @RandPaul @RonJohnsonWI @Jim_Jordan @RepMTG @laurenboebert @RepThomasMassie @mattgaetz @GovRonDeSantis @RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @RWMaloneMD @EmeraldRobinson @BeefUSA @ihcmissouri @HawleyMO @EricTrump
- Oct 19, 202528x their median
🧵🧵🧵 Digital ID is now the law in the United States & it is being implemented as we speak. As a lawyer - the destruction of our privacy rights is making me sick. It is getting worse by the day and people seem unaware that it’s happening. The implementation of digital ID in the U.S. is not driven by a single law, but rather by updates to existing regulations, primarily based on the “Patriot Act,” post-9/11, trade our freedom for security mindset. The most relevant laws facilitate digital identification through state-issued Mobile Driver's Licenses (mDLs) and set the foundational technical requirements. This thread gives an overview of the laws and regulations, along with the relevant text, that provide and facilitate digital ID in the United States. @VigilantFox @RealAlexJones
- Sep 26, 202618x their median
Tom Renz...“We Incentivized MURDERING Patients in Hospitals.” “If you go to the hospital & you get a positive COVID test, the hospital gets more money.” “If you get put on Remdesivir & a Ventilator, the hospital gets more money.” https://t.co/99q8F6C1s7
- Sep 26, 202618x their median
"Shut up panican!" "Quit complaining!" "Forget about Epstein!" "Forget about Covid!" "Meat too expensive? Eat something else!" "Gas too expensive? Deal with it!" "mRNA shots good!" "Flock cameras great!" "Don't like any of this? You're a traitor!" "...oh and hey don't forget to vote for us. It's really important guys. C'mon, please. Get out there and help us win." 🥴
- Sep 1, 202612x their median
🚨BREAKING Exclusive: ➡️ FBI and Congressman knew J6 pipe bomber was law enforcement before the arrest of Brian Cole Jr.🚨 “We knew then it was a law enforcement person.” Established and trusted sources have confirmed to me that the former @FBI Assistant Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs briefed a Congressman, staff, former high-ranking @CapitolPolice commanders, and a well-known journalist that a FirstNet whistleblower informed the FBI that it was a single law enforcement phone number that pinged within three meters of both pipe bomb drop locations on January 5, 2021. Three weeks after that October 16, 2025 briefing, Congressman Barry Loudermilk (R-GA, @RepLoudermilk) sent me a string of personal text messages confirming that he and his staff had received corroborating evidence that the placing of those explosive devices “points to USCP [U.S. Capitol Police] involvement.” The October 16, 2025 FBI briefing On December 2, 2025, only two days before the arrest of Brian Cole Jr. as the alleged J6 pipe bomber, a formerly high-ranking Capitol Police whistleblower reached out to inform me that he had been part of a briefing at Rep. Loudermilk’s office on October 16, 2025. The FBI’s congressional liaison, Marshall Yates, briefed a small group of only five others that the FBI had received information from a First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) whistleblower about a single, redacted FirstNet phone number that had “pinged” within three meters of where pipe bombs were discovered on January 6, 2021, at both the Democratic National Committee and Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington, D.C. According to Yates, the FirstNet whistleblower told the FBI that data long reported as “corrupted” was actually retrievable. The FBI sent a warrant to AT&T and Verizon for that data. Both mobile network carriers sent the recovered data to FirstNet for redactions. According to the Capitol Police whistleblower who attended this briefing, Yates explained that because it was now known by the FBI to be a FirstNet redacted phone number that pinged within three meters of both bomb placement locations on the evening of January 5, he said, “We knew then it was a law enforcement person.” Who was at the briefing *Marshall Yates, (@MarshallYates_) FBI Assistant Director of the Office of Congressional Affairs *Congressman Barry Loudermilk, (@RepLoudermilk) Chairman of the Select Subcommittee to Investigate the Remaining Questions Surrounding January 6, 2021 *Rob Adkerson, (@RobAdkerson1791) Rep. Loudermilk’s then Chief of Staff *Steven Sund, (@ChiefSund) former Chief of the U.S. Capitol Police *A now-retired former Deputy Chief of the U.S. Capitol Police who became a whistleblower in November of 2021 when he filed his first protected disclosure related to the events of January 6, 2021, with members of Congress *John Solomon (@jsolomonReports), investigative journalist, founder and CEO of @JustTheNews. Now serves as the chairman of the new Government Transparency Task Force in the White House. Why they were there The Capitol Police whistleblower told me that he and former Chief Sund had received calls from Rob Adkerson asking them to come in for the meeting. The whistleblower and Sund have a long personal relationship and arranged to meet early for coffee before going to Loudermilk’s office. The whistleblower told me he didn’t understand his purpose for being there, as he had no background or working familiarity with FirstNet or the cellular network providers. *During the development of this story, the whistleblower informed me that he had consulted with Chief Sund several times to ensure their memories of Yates’s briefing were accurate and in sync.* Loudermilk and Adkerson were obvious choices for the briefing, as Loudermilk had chaired both subcommittees investigating January 6 since the GOP won back control of Congress in 2023. Adkerson, the de facto leader of the committees’ investigative efforts, had always been the point man for my many interactions with the Congressman and his staff. According to the whistleblower, John Solomon was the “odd bird” in the mix; even stranger, he said, “Although Yates was giving the briefing, it felt like Solomon called the meeting.” The whistleblower’s most significant observation was in the form of a question, “Why, after all this time, has Solomon never done a story about it?” I have reached out to everyone for comments about that briefing, except for Solomon. Adkerson confirmed the subject matter with me several weeks ago, during his primary campaign run for his former boss’s congressional seat. Loudermilk announced early this year that he would not seek reelection in November, prompting Adkerson to resign as Loudermilk’s chief of staff and mount an unsuccessful effort to earn his boss’s seat in Congress. Loudermilk’s announcement to step down from his seat on February 4 of this year came only three weeks after his new subcommittee’s only hearing on January 14, during which Chairman Loudermilk dropped the most underreported statement by any Congress member this year. Loudermilk revealed, “Additionally, the FBI operational updates note two eyewitnesses who described the gray hoodie suspect as a White male. Did this influence the FBI’s investigation?” Three weeks later, Loudermilk announced he was leaving Congress for “personal reasons,” to spend more dedicated time with his family as a husband, father, and grandfather. What else does Loudermilk know I reached out directly to Loudermilk and his new chief of staff for comment on this story, and while I’ve not heard back from either, I already have an extensive, Capitol Hill-quaking statement from the Congressman. Only 20 days after that October 16, 2025 briefing about the FirstNet phone number pinging at both bomb-drop locations, Loudermilk sent me a string of text messages. At that time, the Congressman was already aware of our coming story in which we would name a former Capitol Police officer as a potential forensic match to the gray hooded bomber. With no prompting, on November 5 of last year, I received the following messages from Loudermilk: “You are about to shake the world!!” “I've been talking with Rob and Brandon … [his former and current chiefs of staff] ... Having my team dig deeper to find corroborating evidence. We had recently uncovered some evidence that was leading us in the same direction. We need to talk face to face. I have info that can fill in the gaps.” “Will need to meet to discuss. It is circumstantial, but it points to USCP involvement.” “If you have this right, I don't believe the individual acted alone. I want to connect the dots and to everyone.” Exactly one month after Loudermilk sent me those text messages, the FBI arrested Brian Cole Jr., an autistic black man who would in no way qualify for a FirstNet phone number. Questions Why hasn’t the FBI or Loudermilk’s committee informed the public about that redacted FirstNet phone number? Will the FBI now publish the data FirstNet recovered, to either confirm or denounce this story? Only one week after the October 16 meeting, the FBI re-upped the $500,000 reward with new video footage of the gray hooded bomber, posting that video to all social media sites and again asking the public for leads to help identify the bomber. This suggests they still had no suspects at the time. Why would they again publicize the reward money and ask for the public’s help when they had new information that the bomber was carrying a first responders FirstNet phone? Why hasn’t the FBI responded to Loudermilk’s revelation that the Bureau had two eyewitnesses stating the gray hooded figure was a “white male?” Also, while several pedestrians crossed paths with that figure on January 5, ironically, one of those people was none other than Marshall Yates. To my knowledge, Yates has never publicly acknowledged whether or not he is one of those two witnesses. (Is he?) Now that he has left his position at the FBI, will he acknowledge the contents of that briefing he gave to Loudermilk et al? Or is that information classified as “secret” or “sensitive,” and would he be in violation of his separation agreement with the FBI to even discuss that briefing? What notes or recordings of that October briefing were made? Was John Solomon taking notes? Had the FBI already pre-briefed him before October 16? If the Capitol Police whistleblower, Chief Sund, and Rob Adkerson’s memories are correct, that information is the single most important story since the January 6 riot itself. Why would Solomon not have published that story sometime in the last 10 and 1/2 months? (Continued, with links below⬇️)
- Sep 30, 202611x their median
From the "In case you think @FBI won't lie about anything and everything" files: Family, neighbors, and 7-11 store owner all say this early morning walk to the store has been a part of Brian Cole Jr's morning routine for more than a decade. FBI had round-the-clock surveillance on him for at least three weeks. Yet claim "Cole's unexpected departure from his residence" as the excuse for LEOs not wearing Body-Worn Cameras. You cannot distrust, despise, or hate the American KGB enough.
- Sep 11, 202611x their median
Just put it on repeat. It’s fantastic. https://t.co/30qarKITTM
- Aug 27, 202611x their median
Tucker Carlson just aired the clip hardcore Republicans were never supposed to see — the man hired to deport millions is bragging about handing out citizenships Markwayne Mullin is running immigration enforcement for Donald Trump. On August 4th he sat in front of the National Governors Association and celebrated it: Almost 900,000 people naturalized in 12 months. Hundreds of thousands more in the pipeline. Every single day the government is open. Trump did not run on that. He ran on the opposite. Then Mullin told the governors the quiet part: We’re going after the “worst of the worst.” After that, you won’t see me in your cities. That’s the head of federal immigration enforcement saying he will stop enforcing immigration law. If Joe Biden’s DHS secretary said that, it would be on Fox all day. This is Trump’s guy. The most pro-illegal-immigration Republican in the Senate. Put in charge of deportations.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 435 interactions against 362K followers, an engagement rate of 0.12%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 74% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.99% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 102x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cyclists, #mancardpulled, #masksareretardedandgay.
- What is Tom Renz's engagement rate on X?
- Tom Renz (@RenzTom) has an engagement rate of 0.12%, based on the median interactions across 53 original posts from the last 30 days against 361,770 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.12%, Tom Renz sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RenzTom have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 74% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RenzTom post?
- Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.8 posts per day across the measured window.