Back to @RelebogileM's profile

Relebogile Mabotja engagement report

@RelebogileM - 95K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.59%
of 95K followers
Per impression
0.56%
269K views on a typical post
Reach
283.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.5K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.064%
171 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.7/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 95K followers, an engagement rate of 1.59%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 269K times each, and 0.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 283.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 372K interactions, about 247x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #botswana.

Compared with accounts its own size

Relebogile Mabotja's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 28% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.59%, Relebogile Mabotja sits above the 75th percentile of the 68,879 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.5% to 2.09%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99116.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 68,879 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 55,257 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile116.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video75% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 75% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 211 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 2026247x their median

    I absolutely love men who stand up for their women🥹🫡 https://t.co/3GUu2hmVaE

    359K13K4093216.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202618x their median

    I have to attend a Jamaican church one day 😂 https://t.co/Jznta8zV2o

    22K4.4K369409762K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202618x their median

    Imagine you’re the husband working 12 hour days to afford the privilege for your wife to stay home in an upper middle class home like this She has every modern luxury, doesn’t worry about food, car paid for, hair done, nice clothes & only one child & you find this on TikTok? https://t.co/drk72IhpZJ

    22K2.2K2.7K3272.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202614x their median

    Mi psicólogo: «No entiendo ese miedo tan irracional que tienes a las escaleras» Yo: «Bueno, es que de pequeño veía la serie Dinastía y...». https://t.co/J2mKfy3Uum

    17K2.2K598379700K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.5x their median

    ARRESTED FOR R800 MILLION FRAUD AND FORGERY Mr S Antonio lozzo (49), Daniel Werner Roets (43), and Abraham Johannes Van Rensburg (56) appeared in the Palmridge Magistrate's Court on Thursday after the Hawks' Germiston Serious Commercial Crime Investigation (SCCIU) successfully executed a J50 warrant of arrest that linked the three to a massive fraud and forgery syndicate involving losses estimated at R800 million. The suspects allegedly forged the complainant's signature at a residential and workplace premises in Brackenhurst these fraudulent documents were then submitted to the Master's Office in Pretoria to officially remove the victim as a trustee. This unlawful action directly resulted in the victim losing approximately R800 million in financial returns, They were granted bail to the amount of R 50,000 each. The case has been postponed to Monday, 05 October 2026 for further investigation

    1.2K9328280219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    How much did you pay for your first car and what was the monthly payment? 🤔

    477481.4K86711K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    Countries that issued sanctions against South Africa during apartheid. https://t.co/wZlP9h8e2n

    7202046555319K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    Wales is about to pass a law allowing them to fire politicians who lie. Would you support this in SA? Should this include lies for votes? Which SA politician would survive this?

    428623465.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    This is you. Sundays are for lovers❤️‍🔥🤌🏽❤️. https://t.co/ShKHTnzkAE

    36459181325K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    If you buy these Purity pouches for babies, please stay safe. SIES @PicknPay @TigerBrands https://t.co/uFsIbai40V

    125100123588K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#botswana

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.5K interactions against 95K followers, an engagement rate of 1.59%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 269K times each, and 0.56% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 283.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 75% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 372K interactions, about 247x its own typical post.

What is Relebogile Mabotja's engagement rate on X?
Relebogile Mabotja (@RelebogileM) has an engagement rate of 1.59%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 94,998 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.59%, Relebogile Mabotja sits above the 75th percentile of the 68,879 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RelebogileM have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RelebogileM post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going