Red Army! engagement report
@RedorDead07 - 209K followers on X
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 209K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.0K times each, and 0.598% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.3K interactions, about 386x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mufc, #mancity.
Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026. Recurring tags: #mufc, #mancity.
Compared with accounts its own size
Red Army!'s engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.011%, Red Army! sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 44% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 17% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 118 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 4, 2026386x their median
🚨NEW: It's been revealed that Andy Burnham's "No 10 North" is set to be built on the exact Ancoats site that Manchester City's Abu Dhabi owners spent a decade holding first refusal over [@theipaper]
- Oct 2, 2026148x their median
🚨 NEW: Manchester City’s chairman privately met Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds in No 10 to discuss current and future UAE investment in Britain days before the club's guilty verdicts were announced
- Oct 2, 202670x their median
🚨 | MAJOR BREAKING: The UAE is reportedly warning Prime Minister Andy Burnham that it could pull BILLIONS OF POUNDS of future investment from the UK in response to the #ManCity verdict. The threat reportedly includes funding sought for the Oxford–Cambridge tech corridor – billed as Britain’s answer to Silicon Valley. [via @rmendick]
- Oct 3, 202652x their median
I don’t often agree with a scouscer #Mufc https://t.co/r1V3zovE38
- Sep 6, 20261.8x their median
Let’s go #Mufc https://t.co/PC4uxyHtGx
- Oct 5, 20261.6x their median
Yes it is all a sham & it was all meant nothing yes nothing your cheating negates it all, they can’t beat us on the pitch we did several times shut up you muppets, just accept the facts they are not your saviors, your going back to where you should have always been bye #Mufc https://t.co/Enaq3YWYQP
- Sep 6, 2026
Just keep giving him the ball our biggest threat today #Mufc https://t.co/uZxFdlxUOi
- Sep 13, 2026
The boss has arrived #Mufc https://t.co/C4o83hT1D3
- Sep 6, 2026
Carrick: “Kobbie can have another big season. He has come back great, & you can see him growing in personality & maturity. He is still so young, & there is loads to still come from him, which is great.” #MUFC https://t.co/9RbLxhL6WK
- Sep 6, 2026
Sesko 2-1 #Mufc https://t.co/NV2SfgVxrC
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 24 interactions against 209K followers, an engagement rate of 0.011%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 25% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.0K times each, and 0.598% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.92% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 9.3K interactions, about 386x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #mufc, #mancity.
- What is Red Army!'s engagement rate on X?
- Red Army! (@RedorDead07) has an engagement rate of 0.011%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 209,071 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.011%, Red Army! sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @RedorDead07 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 25% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @RedorDead07 post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.4 posts per day across the measured window.