Back to @RealWallSt_Wolf's profile

WALL STREET WOLF engagement report

@RealWallSt_Wolf - 462K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 462K followers
Per impression
0.165%
3.0K views on a typical post
Reach
0.65%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
5
interactions (median)
Saved
0.116%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 462K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 0.165% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.655% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 331x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

WALL STREET WOLF's engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 12% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, WALL STREET WOLF sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 495 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 2026331x their median

    https://t.co/c0qIvvQN0g

    1.2K25113892881K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026314x their median

    Hey @coinbase, it has been 9 days since you locked my account with $860k inside it. Your support is useless and does not understand that online casinos will not provide official documents of my gambling activities to you as proof of source of wealth. Can we reach an agreement to let me withdraw my funds and terminate my account? #scam #coinbase #crypto

    1.1K11236134246K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 2026182x their median

    🇯🇵 JUST IN: Binance Pay is now accepted at PayPay merchants across Japan, letting users spend crypto nationwide. https://t.co/4IwlJc2Gyc

    751105401484K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 2026173x their median

    🚨 LATEST: “Rich Dad Poor Dad” author Robert Kiyosaki is reportedly $1.2 billion in debt, according to the New York Post. https://t.co/R047UIuA0j

    6426013530138K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026136x their median

    Wir dürfen aktuell im DACH Raum nicht viel meckern. Auch wenn nicht alles oder vieles NICHT richtig läuft, ist es einfach erschreckend was in Frankreich passiert. https://t.co/iUHzzzizrS

    5861776247K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 2026126x their median

    HYROX mixed relay in Bangkok with the Thai team. Always good to spend some time together outside of work. 💪 https://t.co/iRx5Fn2h8g

    5451265877K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026115x their median

    LATEST: 📊 CryptoQuant CEO Ki Young Ju says he expects this Bitcoin bull cycle to deliver 3–5x rather than another 10x+ rally, arguing that growing institutional ownership is dampening extremes in both directions. https://t.co/XimCLwGmnQ

    45644621395K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202663x their median

    Don’t fall for the price narrative trap that compares apples and oranges. Arbitrum One and Robinhood Chain actively protect against frontrunning and thereby most harmful MEV. Some other chains that advertise lower fees have much higher MEV including frontrunning of retail users. Speaking for myself, I’d much rather pay a known fee upfront than pay less and lose money to hidden fees in the form of being front run, sandwiched etc.

    25116397103K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202652x their median

    🚨 BITMART WITHDRAWALS: MORE THAN A MONTH LATER, USERS STILL CAN’T ACCESS THEIR FUNDS Since BitMart announced its shutdown/restructuring at the end of July, users have still been unable to withdraw their money. More than a month has passed. At the same time, daily withdrawal limits were reportedly slashed by hundreds of times, down to approximately $500–$2,000 per day. Yet even within these tiny limits, withdrawals still don’t work. To put this into perspective: even if withdrawals worked perfectly every single day, withdrawing $10 million at the maximum $2,000/day limit would take 5,000 days — almost 14 YEARS. But the reality is even worse: withdrawals have already been unavailable for more than a month. Support does not respond at all. Instead of giving users access to their own funds, BitMart is telling them to wait for another update by September 9. There is still: — No clear repayment or compensation plan — No clear timeline for restoring withdrawals — No transparent information about liabilities or how much of users’ assets is actually available So I decided to test whether BitMart could process even the smallest possible withdrawal. I submitted an Ethereum withdrawal for 5.10001 USDT: Withdrawal fee: 5.1 USDT Amount to receive: 0.00001 USDT The result? Even 0.00001 USDT cannot be withdrawn. The request remains stuck at “Created” with no TXID. Think about that: with stated daily limits of $500–$2,000, BitMart cannot process a withdrawal of 0.00001 USDT — an amount 50–200 MILLION TIMES smaller than those daily limits. Almost the entire test withdrawal would have been consumed by the fee, yet even the remaining 0.00001 USDT cannot leave the platform. More than a month without access to users’ own money. Support doesn’t respond. Withdrawals don’t work. Even if they did, withdrawing $10M at the current maximum limit would take almost 14 years. And there is still no clear repayment plan. Now users are simply being told to wait again — until September 9. @BitMartExchange @BitMartSupport @sheldonbitmart Where are users’ funds? Where is the repayment plan? And when will users finally be able to withdraw their own money — even 0.00001 USDT?

    18750205475K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202645x their median

    庄币杀人事件再现: $TUT 登顶 1H 爆仓榜💥 ▶︎ Bitget:短时拉至 $1.00616 ▶︎ Gate:短时拉至 $0.7 ▶︎ Binance:短时拉至 $0.3056 Bitget 在爆拉的两分钟内出现累计 754 万美元的爆仓,币安也有个 125 万美元的大单被爆 目前 $TUT 已闪跌至 ~$0.12 附近,短短 20 分钟,故事又结束了

    797132797K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 5 interactions against 462K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 12% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 3.0K times each, and 0.165% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.655% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.7K interactions, about 331x its own typical post.

What is WALL STREET WOLF's engagement rate on X?
WALL STREET WOLF (@RealWallSt_Wolf) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 462,196 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, WALL STREET WOLF sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RealWallSt_Wolf have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 12% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RealWallSt_Wolf post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going