Back to @RealSchlep's profile

Schlep engagement report

@RealSchlep - 426K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.714%
of 426K followers
Per impression
2.35%
130K views on a typical post
Reach
30.5%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.0K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.214%
278 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.53/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 3.0K interactions against 426K followers, an engagement rate of 0.714%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 130K times each, and 2.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video and 53% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 8.1x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 30, 2026. Recurring tag: #schleptwt.

Compared with accounts its own size

Schlep's engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 74% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.714%, Schlep sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.439% to 2.10%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99154.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,996 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 96,714 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile154.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%54K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%56K
04:00 UTC-6%45K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%82K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%99K
14:00 UTC-3%102K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%103K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%89K
19:00 UTC-2%84K
20:00 UTC-1%78K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%54K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%239K
Monday0%303K
Tuesday-3%305K
Wednesday-1%259K
Thursday-2%251K
Friday-3%260K
Saturday+3%234K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 9, 20258.1x their median

    Every account I've ever made on Roblox has been terminated, and Roblox sent a cease and desist letter to me. Not a single Roblox predator I've gotten arrested has faced any action similar to this. I have no words. https://t.co/12dc5mW29j

    20K2.5K9498562.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20264.1x their median

    These kids on tiktok bro 😭😭 https://t.co/E9sgNwVhmR

    11K98829249219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20263.7x their median

    Roblox BANNED @ChrisHansen in-front of THOUSANDS of parents LIVE. New video at 10 AM CST today πŸ‘‡ https://t.co/eFkQ7RbYz4

    10K85319283522K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20263.6x their median

    It’s been a year but this is still incredibly painful to watch https://t.co/zwERc2ggOm

    9.9K92716971615K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20262.7x their median

    Roblox has not banned the user who asked Chris Hansen to go to snapchat. https://t.co/sFL8O2tN97

    7.7K3978713362K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20262.0x their median

    its my birthday!!

    4.9K32582049178K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20261.7x their median

    Roblox AI moderation be like >username is cheesepizza cp >avatar is the colors of the map flag >says its selling child porn Yep... deleting the bio should do it https://t.co/6Xb4GiiHJU

    4.7K3868214146K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    people are now speed running how quickly predators will message them on Roblox https://t.co/dPmgOl1muN

    4.2K251531278K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 2026

    .@TeamYouTube took down my video documenting the increasing CSAM problem on Discord. 2.6m views and 7 months later, an AI system thinks I'm advertising CSAM rings... I specifically got a timestamp for saying "CSAM rings will use MEGA to host CSAM" The future is AI and suffering https://t.co/69YrdxYi1i

    3.7K3405711350K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    the district attorney announced they are taking a 2nd look at the edp case after watching the documentary https://t.co/3J46rBAWbs

    2.9K2014348198K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#schleptwt

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.0K interactions against 426K followers, an engagement rate of 0.714%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 93% of 3,917 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 130K times each, and 2.35% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 30.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 87% carry an image or video and 53% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 8.1x its own typical post.

What is Schlep's engagement rate on X?
Schlep (@RealSchlep) has an engagement rate of 0.714%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 426,289 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.714%, Schlep sits above the 75th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RealSchlep have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 93% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,917 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RealSchlep post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going