Back to @RealAlphaWhale's profile

Alpha Whale 🐳 engagement report

@RealAlphaWhale - 359K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.013%
of 359K followers
Per impression
0.489%
9.4K views on a typical post
Reach
2.62%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
46
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 46 interactions against 359K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 0.489% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 880 interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026. Recurring tag: #binance.

Compared with accounts its own size

Alpha Whale 🐳's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.013%, Alpha Whale 🐳 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video68% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link37% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 68% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 37% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 221 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 26, 202619x their median

    Pi will make history BELIEVE IN SOMETHING . BIG PUMP IS COMING! 10,000X https://t.co/Hfnx0ceWfL

    7667437318K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202613x their median

    Pi is going to higher Something big is coming

    5514221213K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 202612x their median

    Pi SHOULD HIT $10, IN OCTOBER 🚀 ACCEPT, YOU’ll BE RICH IN OCTOBER.

    4822044222K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202611x their median

    🚨 BREAKING NEWS 🚨 PayPal officially lists Pi Network ( $Pi ) among the cryptocurrencies supported by its 'Pay with Crypto' solution. https://t.co/txiyQ3RobP

    471496015K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202610x their median

    🔥 PI NETWORK HAS NEVER DONE A TOKEN BURN. Think about that. No permanent supply reduction. No artificial burn mechanism. No “burn” narrative to create scarcity. And yet, $Pi is building an ecosystem around real utility, payments, apps, developers and millions of Pioneers. Now imagine what happens if future ecosystem mechanisms ever introduce genuine, transparent supply reduction. ⚡ Demand + Utility + Scarcity That combination could change the entire $PI story. Pi doesn't need a burn narrative today. But if scarcity becomes part of the future. watch closely. 👀🥧🚀 #PiNetwork

    4282617310K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20268.8x their median

    Guess the #pi price in 2027 After V23 is completed, Will exchanges start listing $Pi? #pinetwork https://t.co/APyfDL7eR3

    3423625011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20268.1x their median

    Pi Network's offline wallet is coming. You will be able to make offline transactions with Pi even during a global internet outage 😱 Autonomous structures capable of processing and storing data locally—even during network disruptions—before re-synchronizing have been developed, paving the way for offline wallets that can operate without a permanent connection prior to syncing. With or without internet, you will be able to transact with Pi!

    332281117.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20267.1x their median

    1 pi is going to $100 in next 5 years 🔥

    2541754115K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20264.3x their median

    Will a green candle in October drive $PI higher?

    1866807.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.3x their median

    The CLARITY Act will pass! Bitcoin and altcoins will pump.

    1416508.9K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#binance

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 46 interactions against 359K followers, an engagement rate of 0.013%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 0.489% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 37% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 880 interactions, about 19x its own typical post.

What is Alpha Whale 🐳's engagement rate on X?
Alpha Whale 🐳 (@RealAlphaWhale) has an engagement rate of 0.013%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 358,705 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.013%, Alpha Whale 🐳 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RealAlphaWhale have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RealAlphaWhale post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going