Back to @RawdyReales's profile

Dr.Rawdy engagement report

@RawdyReales - 67K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.106%
of 67K followers
Per impression
2.00%
3.6K views on a typical post
Reach
5.30%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
71
interactions (median)
Saved
0.084%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.67/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 71 interactions against 67K followers, an engagement rate of 0.106%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 2.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 228x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dr.Rawdy's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.106%, Dr.Rawdy sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video48% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link3% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 48% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 299 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 2026228x their median

    La verdad, a mí sí me parece justo incapacitar a un paciente solo porque sí. A veces la gente no está enferma: está cansada, saturada y necesita que le den permiso de parar un rato

    15K8206983212K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 2026117x their median

    Con los niños no, listo, quieren datos, aquí hay datos. Advertencia de que voy a discutir suicidio. En Colombia entrevistaron a 4.867 personas LGBT y el 55 % dijo haber tenido pensamientos suicidas en su vida. Uno de cada cuatro lo intentó. ¿Y saben por qué?

    6.6K1.6K11723132K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026112x their median

    La réplica de la oposición arranca con un papelón. Petro dice “vean en este cuadro cómo ha evolucionado el endeudamiento, subió aquí, bajó allí, vean”… y nunca pusieron ningún cuadro. No hubo quién editara el video y le pusiera su cuadro ni siquiera. ¿Ni un bodeguero tuvo la gentileza de ayudarle con eso?

    6.4K1.1K42563172K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202694x their median

    Yo, despertando cada día para ver qué otro derecho fundamental me acaba de quitar el gobierno. https://t.co/RR6RV2cc9H

    5.4K1.1K1072540K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202656x their median

    La fabrica si existe, el médico que la dirige los hizo quedar mal, lo confesó todo. https://t.co/IUSCy6pdEM

    2.6K1.3K522524K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202640x their median

    "No por un video' se debe evaluar a Ramos Alor, dice la presidenta Claudia Sheinbaum https://t.co/X7fOMpfPzH

    1.7K7803027636K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 202628x their median

    Los derechos LGBT+ son derechos humanos básicos. No se debaten, se garantizan.

    1.7K313151219K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20267.2x their median

    Estoy retornado desde el municipio de Tadó, en donde se han desarrollado las labores de búsqueda de la aeronave HK4985 durante los últimos dos días. A pesar de que hoy se logró la identificación del punto de visualización de la aeronave por parte de la FAC, no se logró el ingreso aéreo por condiciones meteorológicas y condiciones de terreno. A primera hora partirá la guardia indígena de la comunidad más cerca para intentar la aproximación terrestre mientras persisten las operaciones aéreas lideradas por la Aerocivil. Como departamento, lamentamos profundamente este hecho tan doloroso. Sabemos que estamos buscando héroes. Por eso las comunidades no han desistido en el acompañamiento de la búsqueda. Mantenemos las acciones y la fe. Nuestra solidaridad y afecto están con sus familias.

    421850214K viewsView on X
  • Mar 12, 20266.1x their median

    https://t.co/FgUZW4m4Zn

    361672215K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.2x their median

    🆘 En Colombia ha sido más facil cambiarle el sexo a una niña, que conseguir una ampolla de gamaglobulina https://t.co/YBFmUSfjte

    179114333.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 71 interactions against 67K followers, an engagement rate of 0.106%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 3.6K times each, and 2.00% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.31% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 228x its own typical post.

What is Dr.Rawdy's engagement rate on X?
Dr.Rawdy (@RawdyReales) has an engagement rate of 0.106%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 66,964 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.106%, Dr.Rawdy sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @RawdyReales have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @RawdyReales post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going